Critical Review on Community-Shared Solar-Advantages, Challenges, and Future Directions

被引:9
作者
Narjabadifam, Nima [1 ]
Fouladvand, Javanshir [2 ]
Gul, Mustafa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
[2] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
energy community; solar energy; solar PV; energy transition; literature review; multi-level perspective; ENERGY COMMUNITIES; SELF-CONSUMPTION; LOCAL ENERGY; MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE; RENEWABLE ENERGY; TRANSITIONS; BUILDINGS; PHOTOVOLTAICS; OPTIMIZATION; DEPLOYMENT;
D O I
10.3390/en16083412
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In the last few years, many innovative solutions have been presented to address the climate change crisis. One of the innovative solutions is the participation of community members in the collective production of solar electricity instead of individual production. The current study aims to provide a critical literature review of the collective production of solar electricity, which is called "community-shared solar" (CSS). Sixty-seven peer-reviewed publications were selected based on the setting up of a combination of related keywords. To analyze the concept of CSS in the existing literature, a multi-level perspective (MLP) framework was used to observe the CSS innovation at the niche, regime, and landscape levels. Four aspects, including the technical, economic, socio-political, and regulatory and institutional, were considered to evaluate those three levels. The results revealed that in the technical and economic aspects, CSS has reached maturity and internal momentum that can take it to the next levels. However, a lack of attention to the socio-political aspect and the regulatory and institutional aspect, in particular, is the potential barrier to the emergence of CSS and its potential position as a leading energy system.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 105 条
  • [71] An agent-based approach to modeling zero energy communities
    Mittal, Anuj
    Krejci, Caroline C.
    Dorneich, Michael C.
    Fickes, David
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2019, 191 : 193 - 204
  • [72] Building a Sustainable Energy Community: Design and Integrate Variable Renewable Energy Systems for Rural Communities
    Mustafa, Jawed
    Almehmadi, Fahad Awjah
    Alqaed, Saeed
    Sharifpur, Mohsen
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [73] Mutani G., 2021, INT J SUSTAIN DEV PL, V17, P1041, DOI [10.18280/ijsdp.170401, DOI 10.18280/IJSDP.170401]
  • [74] Impact of demand response on battery energy storage degradation using gbest-guided artificial bee colony algorithm with forecasted solar insolation
    Naware, Dipanshu
    Badigenchala, Raviteja
    Mitra, Arghya
    Das, Debapriya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2022, 52
  • [75] Modeling Economic Sharing of Joint Assets in Community Energy Projects Under LV Network Constraints
    Norbu, Sonam
    Couraud, Benoit
    Robu, Valentin
    Andoni, Merlinda
    Flynn, David
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 112019 - 112042
  • [76] Optimal renewable generation and battery storage sizing and siting considering local transformer limits
    Novoa, Laura
    Flores, Robert
    Brouwer, Jack
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 256
  • [77] Blockchain-based balance settlement ledger for energy communities in open electricity markets
    Nykyri, Mikko
    Karkkainen, Tommi J.
    Levikari, Saku
    Honkapuro, Samuli
    Annala, Salla
    Silventoinen, Pertti
    [J]. ENERGY, 2022, 253
  • [78] Community Solar Operation Strategy for Smart Energy Communities Considering Resource Fairness
    Oh, Eunsung
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (24):
  • [79] Hybrid standalone microgrid for agricultural last-mile: A techno-economic analysis
    Olatunji, Obafemi O.
    Adedeji, Paul A.
    Madushele, Nkosinathi
    Rasmeni, Zelda Z.
    van Rensburg, Nickey Janse
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 980 - 990
  • [80] Do institutions for collective action evolve?
    Ostrom E.
    [J]. Journal of Bioeconomics, 2014, 16 (1) : 3 - 30