Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of products of conception in recurrent pregnancy loss for specific anomalies detected by USG

被引:1
|
作者
Gajjar, Kinjal [1 ,2 ]
Patel, Alpesh [2 ]
Patel, B., I [3 ]
Chettiar, Shiva [2 ]
Jhala, Devendrasinh [1 ]
机构
[1] Gujarat Univ, Dept Zool, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
[2] GeneXplore Diagnost & Res Ctr Pvt Ltd, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
[3] Shachi Womens Hosp, Gynob Sonoscan & Fetal Med Ctr, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
来源
REPRODUCTION AND FERTILITY | 2023年 / 4卷 / 02期
关键词
array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH); chromosome; copy number variations (CNVs); recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL); Micro ray; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; GENETIC EVALUATION; ABNORMALITIES; KARYOTYPE;
D O I
10.1530/RAF-22-0092
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
To evaluate the proportion of chromosomal abnormalities in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) assisted by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) bright out with higher detection rate, more accuracy, and less sample failure as compared with conventional cytogenetic analysis. In this study, product of conception samples with abnormal ultrasonogram (USG) findings of the fetus and clinical history of RPL were first processed for karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. Normal results given by karyotype and FISH samples with major anomalies detected by ultrasound with RPL were divided into six groups and aCGH was performed to detect the gain or loss and copy number variations (CNVs) of a particular gene present in chromosomal segments. Among a total of 300 products of conception samples, 100 abnormal samples were identified either by karyotype (n = 70) or by FISH (n = 30). From the remaining 200 samples, 5 showed the presence of maternal cell contamination excluded. aCGH analysis revealed (n = 195) that 74 (38%) samples with CNVs and 2 samples with variants of unknown clinical significance were clinically associated with the clinical findings and 121(62%) samples showed no change in CNVs. The most frequent CNVs were loss of chromosome regions at 2q33.1, 7q11.21, 15q11.1, 16p11.2, Xp22.33, and Yp11.32. CNVs at arr[GRCh37]7p22.3,p21.2(830852-15124702)x1,7q34q36.3(141464180-158909738)x3, 14.2 Mbp deletion of 7p22.3p21.2 (SUN1 gene) and 17.4 Mbp duplication of 7q34q36.3 (KCNH2, CNTNAP2, and SHH genes) were found in one sample, and CNVs at arr[GRCh37]8p22.2q22.3(86326349-105509986)x1 and 2.48 Mbp deletion of 8p22.2q22.3 (GRHL1 gene) were found in another sample.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [31] The genomic basis of sporadic and recurrent pregnancy loss: a comprehensive in-depth analysis of 24,900 miscarriages
    Finley, Jenna
    Hay, Sara
    Oldzej, Jeannine
    Meredith, Matthew M.
    Dzidic, Natasa
    Slim, Rima
    Aradhya, Swaroop
    Hovanes, Karine
    Sahoo, Trilochan
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2022, 45 (01) : 125 - 134
  • [32] Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hillman, S. C.
    Pretlove, S.
    Coomarasamy, A.
    McMullan, D. J.
    Davison, E. V.
    Maher, E. R.
    Kilby, M. D.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 37 (01) : 6 - 14
  • [33] Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis does not show genetic alterations in spermatozoa and offspring generated after spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in the mouse
    Goossens, E.
    de Vos, P.
    Tournaye, H.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2010, 25 (07) : 1836 - 1842
  • [34] Array-based comparative genomic hybridization detects copy number variations with prognostic relevance in 80% of ALL with normal karyotype or failed chromosome analysis
    Muehlbacher, V.
    Haferlach, T.
    Kern, W.
    Zenger, M.
    Schnittger, S.
    Haferlach, C.
    LEUKEMIA, 2016, 30 (02) : 318 - 324
  • [35] Prenatal Diagnosis of Proximal Partial Trisomy 1q Confirmed by Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array: Molecular Cytogenetic Analysis, Fetal Pathology and Review of the Literature
    Sifakis, Stavros
    Eleftheriades, Makarios
    Kappou, Dimitra
    Murru, Roberta
    Konstantinidou, Anastasia
    Orru, Sandro
    Ziegler, Monika
    Liehr, Thomas
    Manolakos, Emmanouil
    Papoulidis, Ioannis
    BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH PART A-CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR TERATOLOGY, 2014, 100 (04) : 284 - 293
  • [36] Integration of high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of chromosome 16q with expression array data refines common regions of loss at16q23-qter and identifies underlying candidate tumor suppressor genes in prostate cancer
    Watson, JEV
    Doggett, NA
    Albertson, DG
    Andaya, A
    Chinnaiyan, A
    van Dekken, H
    Ginzinger, D
    Haqq, C
    James, K
    Kamkar, S
    Kowbel, D
    Pinkel, D
    Schmitt, L
    Simko, JP
    Volik, S
    Weinberg, VK
    Paris, PL
    Collins, C
    ONCOGENE, 2004, 23 (19) : 3487 - 3494
  • [37] Embryo selection versus natural selection: how do outcomes of comprehensive chromosome screening of blastocysts compare with the analysis of products of conception from early pregnancy loss (dilation and curettage) among an assisted reproductive technology population?
    Rodriguez-Purata, Jorge
    Lee, Joseph
    Whitehouse, Michael
    Moschini, Rose Marie
    Knopman, Jaime
    Duke, Marlena
    Sandler, Benjamin
    Copperman, Alan
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (06) : 1460 - +