Bacterial vaginosis - diagnostic dilemma and implications

被引:0
|
作者
Atanasievska, Sonja [1 ,4 ]
Nenadic, Dane [2 ]
Stankovic, Slavisa [3 ]
Protic-Djokic, Vesna [1 ]
Ristanovic, Elizabeta [1 ]
机构
[1] Mil Med Acad, Inst Microbiol, Belgrade, Serbia
[2] Mil Med Acad, Ctr Gynecol & Human Reprod, Belgrade, Serbia
[3] Univ Belgrade, Fac Biol, Belgrade, Serbia
[4] Mil Med Acad, Crnotravska 17, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
关键词
diagnostic techniques; obstetrical and gynecological; microscopy; vaginal diseases; vaginal smears; vaginosis; bacterial; MICROBIOME; HEALTH; SMEARS;
D O I
10.2298/VSP210513011A
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Aim. Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is one of the most common microbial dysbiosis, characterized by a decrease of Lactobacillus spp. with an increase of other an-aerobic bacteria species [Gardnerella (G.) vaginalis, Atopobi-um (A.) vaginae, Prevotella spp, Mobiluncus spp, etc.] causing serious gynecological and obstetric complications. There-fore, it is particularly important to have accurate and reli-able diagnostic standards. The aim of this study was to compare the results of various diagnostic methods for detecting BV, such as Amsel, Nugent, and Ison and Hay criteria, as well as multiplex quantitative real-time poly-merase chain reaction (mqRT-PCR) test. Methods. This study involved vaginal swabs from 235 patients of repro-ductive age. Nugent criteria were used as the 'gold stand-ard' compared with Amsel and Ison/Hay criteria as well as mqRT-PCR test based on the detection and quantifi-cation of G. vaginalis, A. vaginae, Lactobacillus spp., and to-tal concentration of bacterial DNA. The kappa coeffi-cient was employed to measure agreement between tests. Results. Our analysis demonstrated excellent agreement between Ison/Hay criteria and Nugent scores (kappa = 0.95), good agreement between Amsel and Nugent crite-ria (kappa = 0.78), while between Nugent criteria and mqRT-PCR test agreement was moderate (kappa = 0.59). Total agreements of Ison/Hay, Amsel, and mqRT-PCR against Nugent scores were 94.9%, 90.2%, and 74%, re-spectively. Nugent methods classified the highest num-ber of intermediate patients -60 (25.2%). The largest number of BV patients was detected by the mqRT-PCR method, while the largest number of healthy patients was detected by Amsel criteria. Conclusion. The mqRT-PCR is the best choice for BV diagnosis because it is more ef-ficient at differentiating patients with intermediate re-sults. Compared to Amsel and Nugent methods that group patients into 2 or 3 categories, the mqRT-PCR method recognizes other conditions of vaginal flora im-portant for correct diagnoses and application of better therapeutic approaches, as well as preventing possible clinical consequences of this dysbiosis.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 15
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS
    HILLIER, SL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 169 (02) : 455 - 459
  • [2] Evaluation of Nugent and Amsel criteria for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis
    Navarrete, P
    Domínguez, M
    Castro, E
    Zemelman, R
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2000, 128 (07) : 767 - 771
  • [3] Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: comparison of Nugent's and novel microscopic method
    Nenadic, Dane
    Ribis, Snezana
    Pavlovic, Milos
    Baskic, Dejan
    VOJNOSANITETSKI PREGLED, 2022, 79 (03) : 264 - 271
  • [4] Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in Chilean sex workers
    Venegas, Gloria
    Boggiano, Gioconda
    Castro, Erica
    REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 30 (01): : 46 - 50
  • [5] The Evolving Facets of Bacterial Vaginosis: Implications for HIV Transmission
    McKinnon, Lyle R.
    Achilles, Sharon L.
    Bradshaw, Catriona S.
    Burgener, Adam
    Crucitti, Tania
    Fredricks, David N.
    Jaspan, Heather B.
    Kaul, Rupert
    Kaushic, Charu
    Klatt, Nichole
    Kwon, Douglas S.
    Marrazzo, Jeanne M.
    Masson, Lindi
    McClelland, R. Scott
    Ravel, Jacques
    van de Wijgert, Janneke H. H. M.
    Vodstrcil, Lenka A.
    Tachedjian, Gilda
    AIDS RESEARCH AND HUMAN RETROVIRUSES, 2019, 35 (03) : 219 - 228
  • [6] Best among the key molecular diagnostic markers of bacterial vaginosis
    Deng, Tongyang
    Song, Xiangquan
    Liao, Qiumei
    Zheng, Ying
    Sun, Hong
    Zhang, Lianzhen
    Chen, Xuejia
    AMB EXPRESS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [7] Bacterial vaginosis: A new perspective
    Monif, GRG
    INFECTIONS IN MEDICINE, 2001, 18 (01) : 25 - 26
  • [8] Bacterial vaginosis and pelvic inflammatory disease
    Monif, GRG
    INFECTIONS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 22 (05) : 230 - 230
  • [9] Douching and bacterial vaginosis: The cart or the horse?
    Monif, GRG
    INFECTIONS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 20 (04) : 177 - +
  • [10] Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy and Compatibility Level of Different Diagnostic Methods for Bacterial Vaginosis
    Molaei, Behnaz
    Mohmmadian, Farnaz
    Tadayon, Parvin
    Gholami, Hamideh
    Kiani, Mahsa
    Rashtchi, Vahideh
    KUWAIT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 50 (02): : 205 - 212