Pavlovian Disgust Conditioning and Generalization: Specificity and Associations With Individual Differences

Although studies have identified differences between fear and disgust conditioning, much less is known about the generalization of conditioned disgust. This is an important gap in the literature given that overgeneralization of condi-tioned disgust to neutral stimuli may have clinical implica-tions. To address this knowledge gap, female participants (n = 80) completed a Pavlovian conditioning procedure in which one neutral food item (conditioned stimulus; CS+) was followed by disgusting videos of individuals vomiting (unconditioned stimulus; US) and another neutral food item (CS-) was not reinforced with the disgusting video. Following this acquisition phase, there was an extinction phase in which both CSs were presented unreinforced. Importantly, participants also evaluated generalization stimuli (GS+, GS-) that resembled, but were distinct from, the CS after each conditioning phase. As predicted, the CS+ was rated as significantly more disgusting and fear inducing than the CS-after acquisition and this pattern persisted after extinction. However, disgust ratings of the CS+ after acquisition were significantly larger than fear ratings. Par-ticipants also rated the GS+ as significantly more disgust-ing, but not fear inducing, than the GS-after acquisition. However, this effect was not observed after extinction. Disgust proneness did predict a greater increase in disgust and fear ratings of the CS+ relative to the CS-after acquisition and extinction. In contrast, trait anxiety predicted only higher fear ratings to the CS+ relative to the CS-after acquisition and extinction. Disgust prone-ness nor trait anxiety predicted the greater increase in dis-gust to the GS+ relative to the GS-after acquisition. These findings suggest that while conditioned disgust can general-ize, individual difference variables that predict generaliza-tion remain unclear. The implications of these findings for disorders of disgust are discussed.