How Can We Design Policy Better? Frameworks and Approaches for Sustainability Transitions

被引:1
作者
Tomai, Maria [1 ]
Ramani, Shyama V. [1 ]
Papachristos, George [2 ]
机构
[1] United Nations Univ, Maastricht Econ & Social Res Inst Innovat & Techno, NL-6211 AX Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Innovat Sci, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
sustainability transitions; socio-technical system; policy design; frameworks; governance; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION SYSTEMS; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE; ORIENTED INNOVATION; SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS; ECO-INNOVATION; DYNAMICS; KNOWLEDGE; ENERGY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/su16020690
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The literature on socio-technical transitions offers a wide range of frameworks and approaches to conceptualise and steer sustainability transitions. However, the complex nature of transition processes, along with the weak correspondence between the transitions literature and policy design, make their joint application rather challenging. In response, this paper proposes a conceptual framework to inform actors managing a system or organisation in a transition process about the steps to follow, from the initial representation of the problem to the formulation of the interventions, and their eventual evaluation for further refinement. This framework is built from an integrative review of the sustainability transitions literature, incorporating state-of-the-art approaches and frameworks to guide policy design. It aims to advance the operationalisation and orientation of policies to accelerate sustainability transitions through a three-phased approach: (i) baseline assessment of systemic challenges, (ii) targets visioning and pathways design, and (iii) implementation and evaluation of policy interventions. The role of the most salient frameworks espoused in the literature is detailed and integrated into the conceptual framework so that transition actors are equipped with the necessary knowledge and tools to design effective policies for the realisation of their sustainability goals.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 44 条
[31]   "Smart regulation": Can policy instrument design solve forest policy aims of expansion and sustainability in Flanders and the Netherlands? [J].
Van Gossum, Peter ;
Arts, Bas ;
Verheyen, Kris .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2012, 16 :23-34
[32]   How can we better predict pulmonary blood clots in patients hospitalised for COVID-19? [J].
Bertoletti, Laurent ;
Huisman, Menno V. .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2020, 56 (04)
[33]   How can we better align private security with the public interest? Towards a civilizing model of regulation [J].
Loader, Ian ;
White, Adam .
REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2017, 11 (02) :166-184
[34]   A In search of sustainable road infrastructure planning: How can we build on historical policy shifts? [J].
Busscher, Tim ;
Tillema, Taede ;
Arts, Jos .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2015, 42 :42-51
[35]   How can policy processes remove barriers to sustainable food systems in Europe? Contributing to a policy framework for agri-food transitions [J].
Galli, Francesca ;
Prosperi, Paolo ;
Favilli, Elena ;
D'Amico, Simona ;
Bartolini, Fabio ;
Brunori, Gianluca .
FOOD POLICY, 2020, 96
[36]   How can randomised controlled trials help improve the design of the common agricultural policy? [J].
Behaghel, Luc ;
Macours, Karen ;
Subervie, Julie .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 46 (03) :473-493
[37]   How might we co-design energy transition policy in old industrial regions? [J].
Sillak, Silver ;
Vasser, Madis .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2023, 33 (02) :139-152
[38]   How better volunteering can improve conservation: why we need to stop wondering whether volunteering in conservation is a good thing and just get better at doing it well [J].
Lithgow, Katy ;
Timbrell, Helen .
JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTE OF CONSERVATION, 2014, 37 (01) :3-14
[39]   Knowing What we Know: a Study of how Small to Medium Sized Software Enterprises can get Better Visibility on What They Know [J].
Heavin, Ciara ;
Adam, Frederic .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION, 2009, :195-205
[40]   Social contracts and community forestry: how can we design forest policies and tenure arrangements to generate local benefits? [J].
Benner, Jordan ;
Lertzman, Ken ;
Pinkerton, Evelyn W. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2014, 44 (08) :903-913