Exploring the dimensions of responsible research systems and cultures: a scoping review

被引:3
作者
Field, Sarahanne M. [1 ,3 ,5 ]
Thompson, Jackie [2 ]
de Rijcke, Sarah [1 ]
Penders, Bart [3 ,4 ]
Munafo, Marcus R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, CWTS, Leiden, Zuid Holand, Netherlands
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol, England
[3] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
[4] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Kate Hamburger Kolleg Cultures Res CoRE, Aachen, Germany
[5] Univ Groningen, Dept Pedag, Groningen, Netherlands
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
responsible research; research integrity; research practice; RESEARCH INTEGRITY; RESEARCH CONDUCT; HUMAN-RIGHTS; INNOVATION; ETHICS; SCIENCE; HEALTH; CODE; TECHNOLOGIES; MISCONDUCT;
D O I
10.1098/rsos.230624
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The responsible conduct of research is foundational to the production of valid and trustworthy research. Despite this, our grasp of what dimensions responsible conduct of research (RCR) might contain-and how it differs across disciplines (i.e. how it is conceptualized and operationalized)-is tenuous. Moreover, many initiatives related to developing and maintaining RCR are developed within disciplinary and institutional silos which naturally limits the benefits that RCR practice can have. To this end, we are working to develop a better understanding of how RCR is conceived and realized, both across disciplines and across institutions in Europe. The first step in doing this is to scope existing knowledge on the topic, of which this scoping review is a part. We searched several electronic databases for relevant published and grey literature. An initial sample of 715 articles was identified, with 75 articles included in the final sample for qualitative analysis. We find several dimensions of RCR that are underemphasized or are excluded from the well-established World Conferences on Research Integrity (WCRI) Singapore Statement on Research Integrity and explore facets of these dimensions that find special relevance in a range of research disciplines.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 121 条
[1]   Let's Fix our Own Problem: Quelling the Irresponsible Research Perfect Storm [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Archibold, Estelle E. ;
Rice, Darryl B. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2022, 59 (06) :1628-1642
[2]   Democratising Measurement: or Why Thick Concepts Call for Coproduction [J].
Alexandrova, Anna ;
Fabian, Mark .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2022, 12 (01)
[3]   Engaging with communities, engaging with patients: amendment to the NAPCRG 1998 Policy Statement on Responsible Research With Communities [J].
Allen, Michele L. ;
Salsberg, Jon ;
Knot, Michaela ;
LeMaster, Joseph W. ;
Felzien, Maret ;
Westfall, John M. ;
Herbert, Carol P. ;
Vickery, Katherine ;
Culhane-Pera, Kathleen A. ;
Ramsden, Vivian R. ;
Zittleman, Linda ;
Martin, Ruth Elwood ;
Macaulay, Ann C. .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2017, 34 (03) :313-321
[4]   Responsible reporting of health research studies: transparent, complete, accurate and timely [J].
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Simera, Iveta .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2010, 65 (01) :1-3
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Commission recommendation on a code of conduct for responsible nanosciences and nantotechnologies research & council conclusions on responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2020, The World Bank, P1, DOI [10.1596/34807, DOI 10.1596/34807]
[8]   How to Conduct Responsible Research: A Guide for Graduate Students [J].
Antes, Alison L. ;
Maggi, Leonard B., Jr. .
CURRENT PROTOCOLS, 2021, 1 (03)
[9]  
Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
[10]   Human rights and ethics in genomic research: rethinking the model [J].
Ashcroft, Richard E. .
PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2007, 8 (04) :391-395