Using grounded theory to develop a theory of change for a violence intervention program

被引:9
作者
Voith, Laura A. [1 ,3 ]
Russell, Katie N. [1 ]
Lee, Hyunjune [1 ]
Atwell, Meghan Salas [1 ,4 ]
Mckinney, Sherise J. [1 ,5 ]
Thomas, Tito [6 ]
Barksdale Jr, Edward M. [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Jack Joseph & Morton Mandel Sch Appl Social Sci, 11235 Bellflower Rd, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Univ Hosp, Rainbow Babies & Childrens Hosp, Bentleyville, OH USA
[3] Ctr Trauma & Advers, Cleveland, OH USA
[4] Ctr Urban Poverty & Community Dev, Cleveland, OH USA
[5] Natl Initiat Mixed Income Communities, Cleveland, OH USA
[6] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
Evaluation methodology; Grounded theory; Theory of change; Complex interventions;
D O I
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102303
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Hospital-based violence intervention programs (HVIP) are critical to interrupting the cycle of violence. These interventions are considered "complex" in that they have many mechanisms of change and related outcomes. Few HVIPs clearly identify the underlying mechanisms of intervention and explicitly link those with key out-comes however, limiting the field's ability to know what works best and for whom. To develop a program theory of change for these "complex interventions," a non-linear, robust methodology that is grounded in the lived experience of those delivering and receiving services is needed. To aid researchers, evaluators, students, and program developers, we describe the use of Grounded Theory as a methodology to enhance the development of complex interventions, illuminating a non-linear approach that engages key stakeholders. To illustrate appli-cation, we describe a case example of The Antifragility Initiative, a HVIP in Cleveland, Ohio. The development of the program theory of change was conducted in four phases: (1) review of existing program documents, (2) semi-structured interviews with program developers (n = 6), (3) a focus group with program stakeholders (n = 8), and (4) interviews with caregivers and youth (n = 8). Each phase informed the next and culminated in a theoretical narrative and visual model of the Antifragility Initiative. Together, the theoretical narrative and visual model identify the underlying mechanisms that can promote change by the program.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Affinati Steven, 2016, Trauma Surg Acute Care Open, V1, pe000024, DOI 10.1136/tsaco-2016-000024
[2]  
Akers R. L., 2009, SOCIAL LEARNING SOCI, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315129587
[3]  
Anderson A., 2005, The community builder's approach to theory of change: A practical guide to theory development
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, LOG MOD DEV GUID
[5]   Participatory action research [J].
Baum, Fran ;
MacDougall, Colin ;
Smith, Danielle .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2006, 60 (10) :854-857
[6]  
Blair E., 2015, J METHODS MEASUREMEN, V6, P14, DOI DOI 10.2458/V6I1.18772
[7]  
Bloom S.L., 2017, APA handbook of trauma psychology: Trauma practice, P499, DOI DOI 10.1037/0000020-024
[8]   Using theory of change to design and evaluate public health interventions: a systematic review [J].
Breuer, Erica ;
Lee, Lucy ;
De Silva, Mary ;
Lund, Crick .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2016, 11
[9]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020, LEAD CAUS DEATH INJ
[10]  
Charmaz K., 2001, International Encyclopedia of the Social Behavioral Sciences, V10, P6396, DOI [10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00775-0, DOI 10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00775-0, 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.44029-8, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.44029-8]