A web-based software for group decision with analytic hierarchy process

被引:5
作者
Francozoa, Rafael Verdo [1 ]
Urquiza Junior, Luiz Sergio Velasquez [1 ]
Carrapateira, Elana Souza [1 ]
Pacheco, Bruna Cristine Scarduelli [2 ]
Oliveira, Marcio Teixeira [1 ]
Torsoni, Guilherme Botega [1 ]
Yari, Jiyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Inst Educ Sci & Technol Mato Grosso, Cuiaba, Brazil
[2] Univ Araraquara, Araraquara, Brazil
关键词
Open-source software; Decision support systems; Software for OR; CONSISTENCY INDEX; AHP; PRIORITIES; TRANSITIVITY; JUDGMENTS; PAIRWISE; RATIO;
D O I
10.1016/j.mex.2023.102277
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a multi-criteria decision support method and is widely applied in many areas. The original AHP method proposed by Thomas L. Saaty in the 1970s re-quires (n 2-n)/2 comparisons. The number of required comparisons can make using this method challenging for maintaining consistent judgments in problems involving many criteria and/or alternatives. Furthermore, the available software is platform-dependent and generally does not support group decision-making. In this paper, we present software for AHP that demands n-1 com-parisons. Additionally, the software supports group decision-making using individual aggregation of priorities with arithmetic and geometric means. The system is available at http://ahpweb.net/ and is accessible from any internet-connected device. It currently has more than 100 users and dozens of decision problems in various areas.& BULL; The original AHP formulation requires (n 2-n)/2 comparisons per cluster which makes it dif-ficult to make consistent judgments.& BULL; AHP avaliable software does not enable group decision making.& BULL; The proposed system AHP-WEB fills these gaps. The method demands n-1 comparisons per cluster without any inconsistency and allows group decision making on a web system.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] A new parsimonious AHP methodology: Assigning priorities to many objects by comparing pairwise few reference objects
    Abastante, Francesca
    Corrente, Salvatore
    Greco, Salvatore
    Ishizaka, Alessio
    Lami, Isabella M.
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 127 : 109 - 120
  • [2] The geometric consistency index:: Approximated thresholds
    Aguarón, J
    Moreno-Jiménez, JM
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 147 (01) : 137 - 145
  • [3] Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: A new approach
    Alonso, Jose Antonio
    Lamata, M. Teresa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2006, 14 (04) : 445 - 459
  • [4] On the choice of weights for aggregating judgments in non-negotiable AHP group decision making
    Amenta, Pietro
    Lucadamo, Antonio
    Marcarelli, Gabriella
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 288 (01) : 294 - 301
  • [5] Asadabadi Mehdi Rajabi, 2019, Cogent Engineering, V6, DOI 10.1080/23311916.2019.1623153
  • [6] Brunelli M., 2014, Introduction to the Analytic Hierarchy Process
  • [7] AHP, a Reliable Method for Quality Decision Making: A Case Study in Business
    Canco, Irina
    Kruja, Drita
    Iancu, Tiberiu
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (24)
  • [8] A common framework for deriving preference values from pairwise comparison matrices
    Choo, EU
    Wedley, WC
    [J]. COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (06) : 893 - 908
  • [9] A NOTE ON THE ANALYSIS OF SUBJECTIVE JUDGMENT MATRICES
    CRAWFORD, G
    WILLIAMS, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 29 (04) : 387 - 405
  • [10] Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction
    Darko, Amos
    Chan, Albert Ping Chuen
    Ameyaw, Ernest Effah
    Owusu, Emmanuel Kingsford
    Parn, Erika
    Edwards, David John
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19 (05) : 436 - 452