Identifying Factors That Impact Levels of Automation in Autonomous Systems

被引:2
作者
Melo, Glaucia [1 ]
Nascimento, Nathalia [1 ]
Alencar, Paulo [1 ]
Cowan, Donald [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Sch Comp Sci, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Automation; Task analysis; Autonomous systems; Collaboration; Adaptation models; Taxonomy; Human computer interaction; Robots; Software engineering; levels of automation; adaptive system; autonomous systems; software design; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3282617
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The need to support complex human and machine collaboration has increased because of recent advances in the use of software and artificial intelligence approaches across various application domains. Building applications with more autonomy has grown dramatically as modern system development capability has significantly improved. However, understanding how to assign duties between humans and machines still needs improvement, and there is a need for better approaches to apportion these tasks. Current methods do not make adaptive automation easy, as task assignments during system operation need to take knowledge about the optimal level of automation (LOA) into account during the collaboration. There is currently a lack of explicit knowledge regarding the factors that influence the variability of human-system interaction and the correct LOA. Additionally, models have not been provided to represent the adaptive LOA variation based on these parameters and their interactions and interdependencies. The study, presented in this paper, based on an extensive literature review, identifies and classifies the factors that affect the degree of automation in autonomous systems. It also proposes a model based on feature diagrams representing the factors and their relationships with LOAs. With the support of two illustrative examples, we demonstrate how to apply these factors and how they relate to one another. This work advances research in the design of autonomous systems by offering an adaptive automation approach that can suggest levels of automation to facilitate human-computer interactions.
引用
收藏
页码:56437 / 56452
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   One size does not fit all: Understanding user preferences for building automation systems [J].
Ahmadi-Karvigh, Simin ;
Ghahramani, Ali ;
Becerik-Gerber, Burcin ;
Soibelman, Lucio .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2017, 145 :163-173
[2]  
aimultiple, TOP 9 CUSTOMER SERVI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, CURRENT CHATBOT ABIL
[4]   A Maturity Assessment Framework for Conversational AI Development Platforms [J].
Aronsson, Johan ;
Lu, Philip ;
Struber, Daniel ;
Berger, Thorsten .
36TH ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED COMPUTING, SAC 2021, 2021, :1736-1745
[5]   Image-Based Obstacle Detection Methods for the Safe Navigation of Unmanned Vehicles: A Review [J].
Badrloo, Samira ;
Varshosaz, Masood ;
Pirasteh, Saied ;
Li, Jonathan .
REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (15)
[6]   Toward a Framework for Levels of Robot Autonomy in Human-Robot Interaction [J].
Beer, Jenay M. ;
Fisk, Arthur D. ;
Rogers, Wendy A. .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, 2014, 3 (02) :74-99
[7]  
Bejarano R, 2019, IEEE INTL CONF IND I, P557, DOI [10.1109/indin41052.2019.8972158, 10.1109/INDIN41052.2019.8972158]
[8]   Testing Autonomous Cars for Feature Interaction Failures using Many-Objective Search [J].
Ben Abdessalem, Raja ;
Panichella, Annibale ;
Nejati, Shiva ;
Briand, Lionel C. ;
Stifter, Thomas .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 33RD IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMTED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (ASE' 18), 2018, :143-154
[9]   Co-simulation of a Model Predictive Control System for Automotive Applications [J].
Bernardeschi, Cinzia ;
Dini, Pierpaolo ;
Domenici, Andrea ;
Mouhagir, Ayoub ;
Palmieri, Maurizio ;
Saponara, Sergio ;
Sassolas, Tanguy ;
Zaourar, Lilia .
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND FORMAL METHODS: SEFM 2021 COLLOCATED WORKSHOPS, 2022, 13230 :204-220
[10]   A function-to-task process model for adaptive automation system design [J].
Bindewald, Jason M. ;
Miller, Michael E. ;
Peterson, Gilbert L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2014, 72 (12) :822-834