Two kinds of properties of knowledge networks, knowledge diversity and recombinant innovation: a patent analysis in the wind energy field

被引:8
作者
Ju, Hailong [1 ]
Fang, Yiting [1 ]
Zhu, Yezhen [1 ]
机构
[1] Guilin Univ Technol, Business Sch, Guilin, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Knowledge networks; Knowledge elements; Patents; Recombinant innovation; STRUCTURAL HOLES; COLLABORATION NETWORKS; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; EXPLORATORY INNOVATIONS; UNEVEN GROWTH; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT; BREADTH; SEARCH; DEPTH;
D O I
10.1108/JKM-12-2022-0982
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
PurposePrior literature has long argued that knowledge networks contain great opportunities for innovation, and researchers can identify these opportunities using the properties of knowledge networks (PKNs). However, previous studies have examined only the relationship between structural PKNs (s-PKNs) and innovation, ignoring the effect of qualitative PKNs (q-PKNs), which refer to the quality of the relationship between two elements. This study aims to further investigate the effects of q-PKNs on innovation. Design/methodology/approachUsing a panel data set of 2,255 patents from the Chinese wind energy industry, the authors construct knowledge networks to identify more PKNs and examine these hypotheses. FindingsThe results show that q-PKNs significantly influence recombinant innovation (RI), reflecting the importance of q-PKNs analysed in this study. Moreover, the results suggest that the combinational potential of an element with others may be huge at different levels of q-PKNs. Originality/valueThis study advances the understanding of PKNs and RI by exploring how q-PKNs impact RI. At different levels of PKNs, the potential of the elements to combine with others and form innovation are different. Researchers can more accurately identify the opportunities for RI using two kinds of PKNs. The findings also provide important implications on how government should provide support for R&D firms.
引用
收藏
页码:673 / 697
页数:25
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G ;
Katila, R .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 22 (03) :197-220
[2]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[3]   Firm's strategic choices and network knowledge dynamics: how do they affect innovation? [J].
Antonio Belso-Martinez, Jose ;
Diez-Vial, Isabel .
JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 22 (01) :1-20
[4]  
BELSLEY DA, 1980, REGRESSION DIAGNOSTI
[5]   Balancing breadth and depth of expertise for innovation: A 3M story [J].
Boh, Wai Fong ;
Evaristo, Roberto ;
Ouderkirk, Andrew .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (02) :349-366
[6]   The firm's knowledge network and the transfer of advice among corporate inventors-A multilevel network study [J].
Brennecke, Julia ;
Rank, Olaf .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2017, 46 (04) :768-783
[7]  
BURT RS, 1992, NETWORKS AND ORGANIZATIONS : STRUCTURE, FORM, AND ACTION, P57
[8]   Structural holes and good ideas [J].
Burt, RS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2004, 110 (02) :349-399
[9]   WHERE DO FIRMS' RECOMBINANT CAPABILITIES COME FROM? INTRAORGANIZATIONAL NETWORKS, KNOWLEDGE, AND FIRMS' ABILITY TO INNOVATE THROUGH TECHNOLOGICAL RECOMBINATION [J].
Carnabuci, Gianluca ;
Operti, Elisa .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (13) :1591-1613
[10]  
Carnabuci G, 2009, SOC FORCES, V88, P607