Prevalence of visual impairment, uncorrected refractive errors and effective refractive error coverage in Koshi Province, Nepal - Rapid Assessment of Refractive Errors

被引:1
|
作者
Karn, Rajiv Ranjan [1 ]
Marmamula, Srinivas [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Thakur, Sudhir Kumar [1 ]
Sitoula, Rakshya Pant [6 ]
Shah, Ranjan [7 ]
Mehta, Amit Kumar [6 ]
Saha, Ranindita [2 ]
Saravanan, Saibaba [8 ]
Ali, Rahul [9 ]
机构
[1] Biratnagar Eye Hosp, Eastern Reg Eye Care Program, Biratnagar, Nepal
[2] LV Prasad Eye Inst, Allen Foster Community Eye Hlth Res Ctr, Gullapalli Pratibha Rao Int Ctr Advancement Rural, Hyderabad, India
[3] LV Prasad Eye Inst, Brien Holden Inst Optometry & Vis Sci, Hyderabad, India
[4] LV Prasad Eye Inst, Wellcome Trust Dept Biotechnol India Alliance, Hyderabad, India
[5] Univ New South Wales UNSW, Sch Optometry & Vis Sci, Sydney, Australia
[6] Biratnagar Eye Hosp, Biratnagar, Nepal
[7] Nepal Netra Jyoti Sangh, Kathmandu, Nepal
[8] Prashasa Hlth Consultants, Hyderabad, India
[9] OneSight Essilor Luxott Fdn, Mason, OH USA
关键词
SPECTACLE COVERAGE; PRESBYOPIA;
D O I
10.1038/s41433-023-02786-4
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background/ObjectiveTo determine the prevalence of visual impairment (VI), uncorrected refractive errors (URE), and effective refractive error coverage among individuals aged 15-50 years in Koshi Province, Nepal.MethodsA population-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Koshi Province in which 4800 participants were selected from 80 clusters. The study teams visited the selected households and conducted eye examinations. This included monocular unaided (and aided) visual acuity assessment using a Snellen chart with tumbling E optotypes at a distance of 6 meters. Near vision was assessed binocularly using the N notation chart at a fixed distance of 40 cm for each individual. Torchlight examination and distance direct ophthalmoscopy was done. VI was defined as presenting visual acuity worse than 6/12 in the better eye. URE was defined as presenting visual acuity worse than 6/12 and improving to 6/12 or better on using a pinhole. Near Vision Impairment was defined as binocular presenting near vision worse than N8 among those age 35 years and older.ResultsIn total, 4057 were examined (84.5% response rate). The prevalence of VI was 3.52% (95% CI:2.89-4.13; n = 143). The prevalence of URE in the better eye was 1.95% (95% CI:1.54-2.42; n = 79). The Refractive Error Coverage and Effective Refractive Error Coverage were 34.8% and 31.3% respectively. The prevalence of NVI was 34.24% (95% CI: 32.1-36.40; n = 666).ConclusionThe prevalence of VI and URE was low, attributed to the availability and uptake of services in Koshi province in Nepal.
引用
收藏
页码:2173 / 2178
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Uncorrected Refractive Errors, Presbyopia and Spectacle Coverage: Results from a Rapid Assessment of Refractive Error Survey
    Marmamula, Srinivas
    Keeffe, Jill E.
    Rao, Gullapalli N.
    OPHTHALMIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 16 (05) : 269 - 274
  • [2] Prevalence of refractive errors, uncorrected refractive error, and presbyopia in adults in India: A systematic review
    Sheeladevi, Sethu
    Seelam, Bharani
    Nukella, Phanindra B.
    Borah, Rishi R.
    Ali, Rahul
    Keay, Lisa
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 67 (05) : 583 - +
  • [3] Prevalence of uncorrected refractive errors, presbyopia and spectacle coverage in marine fishing communities in South India: Rapid Assessment of Visual Impairment (RAVI) project
    Marmamula, Srinivas
    Madala, Sreenivas R.
    Rao, Gullapalli N.
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2012, 32 (02) : 149 - 155
  • [4] Influence of uncorrected refractive error and unmet refractive error on visual impairment in a Brazilian population
    Ferraz, Fabio H.
    Corrente, Jose E.
    Opromolla, Paula
    Schellini, Silvana A.
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 14
  • [5] Prevalence of visual impairment due to uncorrected refractive error: Results from Delhi-Rapid Assessment of Visual Impairment Study
    Senjam, Suraj Singh
    Vashist, Praveen
    Gupta, Noopur
    Malhotra, Sumit
    Misra, Vasundhara
    Bhardwaj, Amit
    Gupta, Vivek
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 64 (05) : 387 - 390
  • [6] Prevalence of Refractive Error and Spectacle Coverage in Zoba Ma'ekel Eritrea: A Rapid Assessment of Refractive Error
    Chan, Ving Fai
    Mebrahtu, Goitom
    Ramson, Prasidh
    Wepo, Mary
    Naidoo, Kovin S.
    OPHTHALMIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 20 (03) : 131 - 137
  • [7] Prevalence of refractive error, presbyopia and spectacle coverage in Kahama District, Tanzania: a rapid assessment of refractive error
    Mashayo, Eden R.
    Chan, Ving Fai
    Ramson, Prasidh
    Chinanayi, Farai
    Naidoo, Kovin S.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2015, 98 (01) : 58 - 64
  • [8] Prevalence of uncorrected distance refractive errors and associated risk factors in employees of an academic centre
    Abdolalizadeh, Parya
    Mehrdad, Ramin
    Saberzadeh-Ardestani, Bahar
    Pouragha, Hamidreza
    Alipour, Fateme
    Esmaili, Mehrdad
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2023, 106 (08) : 869 - 875
  • [9] Toward eliminating blindness due to uncorrected refractive errors: assessment of refractive services in the northern and central regions of Ghana
    Ntodie, Michael
    Danquah, Lisa
    Kandel, Himal
    Abokyi, Samuel
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2014, 97 (06) : 511 - 515
  • [10] Prevalence of refractive error, presbyopia, and unmet need of spectacle coverage in a northern district of Bangladesh: Rapid Assessment of Refractive Error study
    Muhit, Mohammad
    Minto, Hasan
    Parvin, Afroza
    Jadoon, Mohammad Z.
    Islam, Johurul
    Yasmin, Sumrana
    Khandaker, Gulam
    OPHTHALMIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 25 (02) : 126 - 132