Artificial Intelligence Decision Support for Triple-Negative Breast Cancers on Ultrasound

被引:3
作者
Coffey, Kristen [7 ,1 ]
Aukland, Brianna [1 ]
Amir, Tali [1 ]
Sevilimedu, Varadan [2 ]
Saphier, Nicole B. [1 ]
Mango, Victoria L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY USA
关键词
artificial intelligence; breast cancer; US; triple-negative; IMAGING FEATURES; TUMORS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOMICS;
D O I
10.1093/jbi/wbad080
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective To assess performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) decision support software in assessing and recommending biopsy of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) on US.Methods Retrospective institutional review board-approved review identified patients diagnosed with TNBC after US-guided biopsy between 2009 and 2019. Artificial intelligence output for TNBCs on diagnostic US included lesion features (shape, orientation) and likelihood of malignancy category (benign, probably benign, suspicious, and probably malignant). Artificial intelligence true positive was defined as suspicious or probably malignant and AI false negative (FN) as benign or probably benign. Artificial intelligence and radiologist lesion feature agreement, AI and radiologist sensitivity and FN rate (FNR), and features associated with AI FNs were determined using Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Fisher's exact test, chi-square test of independence, and kappa statistics.Results The study included 332 patients with 345 TNBCs. Artificial intelligence and radiologists demonstrated moderate agreement for lesion shape and orientation (k = 0.48 and k = 0.47, each P <.001). On the set of examinations using 6 earlier diagnostic US, radiologists recommended biopsy of 339/345 lesions (sensitivity 98.3%, FNR 1.7%), and AI recommended biopsy of 333/345 lesions (sensitivity 96.5%, FNR 3.5%), including 6/6 radiologist FNs. On the set of examinations using immediate prebiopsy diagnostic US, AI recommended biopsy of 331/345 lesions (sensitivity 95.9%, FNR 4.1%). Artificial intelligence FNs were more frequently oval (q <.001), parallel (q <.001), circumscribed (q =.04), and complex cystic and solid (q =.006).Conclusion Artificial intelligence accurately recommended biopsies for 96% to 97% of TNBCs on US and may assist radiologists in classifying these lesions, which often demonstrate benign sonographic features.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 44
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype - A population-based study from the California Cancer Registry
    Bauer, Katrina R.
    Brown, Monica
    Cress, Rosemary D.
    Parise, Carol A.
    Caggiano, Vincent
    [J]. CANCER, 2007, 109 (09) : 1721 - 1728
  • [2] Triple-Negative Breast Cancers: Associations Between Imaging and Pathological Findings for Triple-Negative Tumors Compared With HormoneReceptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2-Negative Breast Cancers
    Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine
    MacGrogan, Gaetan
    Debled, Marc
    Ferron, Stephane
    Asad-Syed, Maryam
    McKelvie-Sebileau, Pippa
    Mathoulin-Pelissier, Simone
    Brouste, Veronique
    Hurtevent-Labrot, Gabrielle
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2013, 18 (07) : 802 - 811
  • [3] Imaging features of triple-negative breast cancers according to androgen receptor status
    Candelaria, Rosalind P.
    Adrada, Beatriz E.
    Wei, Wei
    Thompson, Alastair M.
    Santiago, Lumarie
    Lane, Deanna L.
    Huang, Monica L.
    Arribas, Elsa M.
    Rauch, Gaiane M.
    Symmans, W. Fraser
    Gilcrease, Michael Z.
    Huo, Lei
    Lim, Bora
    Ueno, Naoto T.
    Moulder, Stacy L.
    Yang, Wei Tse
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 114 : 167 - 174
  • [4] Triple-negative breast cancer: Clinical features and patterns of recurrence
    Dent, Rebecca
    Trudeau, Maureen
    Pritchard, Kathleen I.
    Hanna, Wedad M.
    Kahn, Harriet K.
    Sawka, Carol A.
    Lickley, Lavina A.
    Rawlinson, Ellen
    Sun, Ping
    Narod, Steven A.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (15) : 4429 - 4434
  • [5] Multimodality Imaging of Triple Receptor-Negative Tumors With Mammography, Ultrasound, and MRI
    Dogan, Basak E.
    Gonzalez-Angulo, Ana Maria
    Gilcrease, Michael
    Dryden, Mark J.
    Yang, Wei Tse
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (04) : 1160 - 1166
  • [6] DOrsi CJ, 2013, ACR BI-RADS atlas: breast imaging reporting and data system
  • [7] mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, follow-up and outcome monitoring, data dictionary
  • [8] Ultrasound-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of triple-negative breast cancer from fibroadenoma
    Du, Yu
    Zha, Hai-Ling
    Wang, Hui
    Liu, Xin-Pei
    Pan, Jia-Zhen
    Du, Li-Wen
    Cai, Meng-Jun
    Zong, Min
    Li, Cui-Ying
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 95 (1133)
  • [9] Dui HY, 2015, INT J CLIN EXP MED, V8, P10040
  • [10] Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: Prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center
    Freer, TW
    Ulissey, MJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (03) : 781 - 786