Investigating UAV Propellers Performances Near Moving Obstacles: CFD Study, Thrust Control, and Battery Energy Management

被引:2
作者
Hage, Charbel [1 ]
Sophy, Tonino [1 ]
Aglzim, El-Hassane [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Burgundy, DRIVE Lab, F-58000 Nevers, France
来源
IEEE OPEN JOURNAL OF VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY | 2023年 / 4卷
关键词
Propellers; Computational modeling; Quadrotors; Drones; Aerodynamics; Stability analysis; Computational fluid dynamics; Battery management; Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD); fixed obstacle effect; mesh motion; moving obstacle effect; Multiple Reference Frame (MRF); Phantom DJI 3; power consumption; propellers spacing effect; stability; thrust control; thrust force variation; AERIAL VEHICLES UAVS; AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS; CIVIL APPLICATIONS; FLIGHT;
D O I
10.1109/OJVT.2023.3309103
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Quadcopters are widely used in military and civilian applications, but when flying near moving objects, they may encounter flight instability. This study investigates the flow aerodynamic interference of two drones' propellers when they hover near moving obstacles using CFD simulations. An unstructured mesh is used with frame motion to model the propeller's rotation. Different altitudes, rotational speeds, and obstacle velocities are tested to understand their aerodynamic effects on the propeller's performance. The results indicate that hovering 0.1 m above a fixed obstacle at 9550 rpm increased lift by 9.28%. This decreased by half when propellers were positioned adjacent to each other. Besides, a moving wall below the propellers at various velocities significantly affects the thrust and power variation of the propellers at low hovering speeds. For example, when hovering at 3000 rpm over a moving wall at 10 m/s, the thrust on one side of the UAV decreases by 8.51%, leading to flight instability. Different thrust control strategies and flight scenarios are performed to ensure flight stability and energy management. Finally, thrust control strategies prove crucial in stabilizing thrust and altitude, but power consumption increases by 12.8%, requiring 30% more energy required under specific flight scenarios near moving obstacles.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 609
页数:20
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, Ansys fluent theory guide
  • [2] Asnafi M., 2018, Sustainable Structures and Materials, An International Journal, V1, P44, DOI [10.26392/SSM.2018.01.02.044, DOI 10.26392/SSM.2018.01.02.044]
  • [3] Bangura M, 2012, Nonlinear dynamic modeling for high performance control of a quadrotor
  • [4] Bernard D., 2017, 4 CEAS SPECIALIST C, P351
  • [5] Cheeseman I., 1955, The effect of the ground on a helicopter rotor in forward flight
  • [6] Design, Manufacturing, and Flight Testing of an Experimental Flying Wing UAV
    Chung, Pei-Hsiang
    Ma, Der-Ming
    Shiau, Jaw-Kuen
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (15):
  • [7] Comini G., 1982, Numerical Heat Transfer, V5, P463, DOI 10.1080/10407788208913459
  • [8] de Miguel Molina B., 2018, The Drone Sector in Europe, P7
  • [9] Deters R.W., 2017, 35 AIAA APPL AERODYN, P1, DOI DOI 10.2514/6.2017-3743
  • [10] DJI, 2023, DJI PHANT 3 SE UNB F