The future of academic publishing

被引:23
作者
Ahmed, Abubakari [1 ]
Al-Khatib, Aceil [2 ]
Boum II, Yap [3 ,4 ]
Debat, Humberto [5 ]
Dunkelberg, Alonso Gurmendi [6 ]
Hinchliffe, Lisa Janicke [7 ]
Jarrad, Frith [8 ]
Mastroianni, Adam
Mineault, Patrick [9 ]
Pennington, Charlotte R. [10 ]
Pruszynski, J. Andrew [11 ]
机构
[1] SD Dombo Univ Business & Integrated Dev Studies, Dept Urban Design & Infrastruct Studies, Wa, Ghana
[2] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Dent, Irbid, Jordan
[3] Inst Pasteur, 9HFF GFH, Bangui, Cent Afr Republ
[4] Univ Yaounde I, Fac Med & Biomed Sci, Yaounde, Cameroon
[5] Inst Nacl Tecnol Agr, Inst Patol Vegetal, Ctr Invest Agr, IPAVE,CIAP,INTA, Cordoba, Argentina
[6] Univ Oxford, Dept Polit & Int Relat, Oxford, England
[7] Univ Illinois, Univ Lib, Urbana, IL USA
[8] Soc Conservat Biol, Conservat Biol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Xcorr Consulting Inc, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[10] Aston Univ, Sch Psychol, Birmingham, England
[11] Western Univ, Dept Physiol & Pharmacol, London, ON, Canada
关键词
REVIEWERS; IMPACT; ACCESS; STOP;
D O I
10.1038/s41562-023-01637-2
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Academic publishing is the backbone of science dissemination - but is the current system fit for purpose? We asked a diverse group of scientists to comment on the future of publishing. They discuss systemic issues, challenges, and opportunities, and share their vision for the future.
引用
收藏
页码:1021 / 1026
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
[21]  
European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, 2021, REF RES ASS SYST SCO
[22]  
Federation of Finnish Learned Societies Committee for Public Information Finnish Association for Scholarly Publishing Universities Norway & European Network for Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities, 2019, HELS IN MULT SCHOL C, DOI [10.6084/m9.figshare.7887059, DOI 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.7887059]
[23]   Inconsistent and incomplete retraction of published research: A cross-sectional study on Covid-19 retractions and recommendations to mitigate risks for research, policy and practice [J].
Frampton, Geoff ;
Woods, Lois ;
Scott, David Alexander .
PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (10)
[24]   Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Godlee, F ;
Gale, CR ;
Martyn, CN .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (03) :237-240
[25]  
Grossmann Alexander, 2021, F1000Res, V10, P20, DOI 10.12688/f1000research.27468.1
[26]   Predatory journals: no definition, no defence [J].
Grudniewicz, Agnes ;
Moher, David ;
Cobey, Kelly D. ;
Bryson, Gregory L. ;
Cukier, Samantha ;
Allen, Kristiann ;
Ardern, Clare ;
Balcom, Lesley ;
Barros, Tiago ;
Berger, Monica ;
Ciro, Jairo Buitrago ;
Cugusi, Lucia ;
Donaldson, Michael R. ;
Egger, Matthias ;
Graham, Ian D. ;
Hodgkinson, Matt ;
Khan, Karim M. ;
Mabizela, Mahlubi ;
Manca, Andrea ;
Milzow, Katrin ;
Mouton, Johann ;
Muchenje, Marvelous ;
Olijhoek, Tom ;
Ommaya, Alexander ;
Patwardhan, Bhushan ;
Poff, Deborah ;
Proulx, Laurie ;
Rodger, Marc ;
Severin, Anna ;
Strinzel, Michaela ;
Sylos-Labini, Mauro ;
Tamblyn, Robyn ;
van Niekerk, Marthie ;
Wicherts, Jelte M. ;
Lalu, Manoj M. .
NATURE, 2019, 576 (7786) :210-212
[27]   Striving towards true equity in global health: A checklist for bilateral research partnerships [J].
Hodson, Daniel Z. ;
Etoundi, Yannick Mbarga ;
Parikh, Sunil ;
Boum II, Yap .
PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 3 (01)
[28]  
International Science Council, 2021, OP REC SCI MAK SCHOL
[29]   Why most published research findings are false [J].
Ioannidis, JPA .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2005, 2 (08) :696-701
[30]   Easing Into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors [J].
Kathawalla, Ummul-Kiram ;
Silverstein, Priya ;
Syed, Moin .
COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 7 (01)