Ammonia from solid fuels: A cost-effective route to energy security with negative CO2 emissions

被引:12
作者
del Pozo, Carlos Arnaiz [1 ]
Cloete, Schalk [2 ,3 ]
Alvaro, Angel Jimenez [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Madrid, Spain
[2] SINTEF Ind, Trondheim, Norway
[3] SINTEF Ind, Flow Technol Grp, SP Andersens vei 15B, N-7031 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Ammonia; CO2; capture; Gasification; Techno-economic assessment; Energy carrier; Energy security; IGCC POWER-PLANTS; THERMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; CARBON CAPTURE; GASIFICATION; COAL; PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION; EFFICIENCY; LNG;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2023.127880
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study investigates a potential solution to the global challenge of secure, affordable, and low-carbon energy supply: ammonia production from local coal and biomass resources with CO2 capture for negative emissions. Two innovative configurations; an E-gas gasifier with membrane-assisted water-gas shift and an air-blown MHI gasifier design, are compared with an oxygen-blown GE gasifier benchmark. Under the baseline cost assumptions of 2.5 euro/GJ for coal, 6.1 euro/GJ for biomass, and a CO2 tax of 100 euro/ton, the GE configuration reached a levelized cost of ammonia (LCOA) of 391.5 euro/ton, while the E-gas and MHI concepts showed 59.0 (-15.1%) and 18.6 (4.8%) euro/ton lower and higher costs, respectively. Subsequent benchmarking against alternative ammonia supply pathways showed that the energy security offered by the E-gas configuration comes at a premium of around 40% over ammonia imported at cost from natural gas exporting regions, which will be cheaper than liquified natural gas if the CO2 price exceeds 60.9 euro/ton. Since prices of imported energy are generally well above the cost of production, the carbon-negative energy security offered by the proposed plants can be economically attractive to importers with rising CO2 taxes. Thus, policy support for establishing local ammonia value chains can be recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 57 条
[21]   Thermodynamic analysis of air-blown gasification for IGCC applications [J].
Giuffrida, Antonio ;
Romano, Matteo C. ;
Lozza, Giovanni .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2011, 88 (11) :3949-3958
[22]   Thermodynamic assessment of IGCC power plants with hot fuel gas desulfurization [J].
Giuffrida, Antonio ;
Romano, Matteo C. ;
Lozza, Giovanni G. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2010, 87 (11) :3374-3383
[23]   Performance and exergy analysis of the current developments in coal gasification technology [J].
Graebner, Martin ;
Meyer, Bernd .
FUEL, 2014, 116 :910-920
[24]   Effects of metal dusting relevant exposures of alloy 601 surfaces on carbon formation and oxide development [J].
Guo, Xiaoyang ;
Vanhaecke, Estelle ;
Vullum, Per Erik ;
Ma, Jianyu ;
Gunawardana, P. V. Daham S. ;
Walmsley, John C. ;
Chen, De ;
Venvik, Hilde J. .
CATALYSIS TODAY, 2021, 369 :48-61
[25]   Techno-economic analysis of gasification routes for ammonia production from Victorian brown coal [J].
Habgood, David C. C. ;
Hoadley, Andrew F. A. ;
Zhang, Lian .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2015, 102 :57-68
[26]  
Hannemann F, 2002, V94 2 BUGGENUM EXPER, P27
[27]  
Hashimoto T., 2009, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review, V46, P1
[28]  
Heffer P., 2016, Global nitrogen fertiliser demand supply: tend, current level outlook
[29]  
Higman C, 2008, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING ISSUES FOR SOLID FUELS, P423, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-373611-6.00011-2
[30]   Kinetics of high-temperature water-gas shift reaction over two iron-based commercial catalysts using simulated coal-derived syngases [J].
Hla, San Shwe ;
Park, D. ;
Duffy, G. J. ;
Edwards, J. H. ;
Roberts, D. G. ;
Ilyushechkin, A. ;
Morpeth, L. D. ;
Nguyen, T. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2009, 146 (01) :148-154