Collusion and corporate tax burden: Firm-level evidence from China

被引:1
|
作者
Feng, Yuanlin [1 ]
Wang, Fei [2 ]
He, Lingyun [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Publ Finance & Taxat, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Econ Sch, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Econ Sch, 182 Nanhu Ave,East Lake High Tech Dev Zone, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
EVASION; CORRUPTION; COMPETITION; COSTS; GOVERNMENT; COUNTRIES; RATES;
D O I
10.1002/mde.3923
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Government-firm collusion and corporate tax avoidance will result in tax loss, which has spawned several challenges that hinder economic growth and political stability. Based on the microdata of the National Tax Statistics Database (NTSD) of China from 2010 to 2014, this paper estimates the impact of government-firm collusion on corporate tax burden. Using the business entertainment expenses as a measure of collusion, we find that government-firm collusion significantly reduces corporate tax burden and increases tax avoidance. Mechanism analysis shows that collusion reduces corporate tax burden by providing firms with preferential tax policies and weakening taxation supervision of tax authorities. In addition, we find that reaping enormous benefits is the primary motivation for government-firm collusion. The reduction effect of collusion on tax burden will be more substantial if the parties involved can reap more benefits. If tax collectors' discretionary power is restricted, the mutual benefits will be reduced, thus making it difficult for tax officials and taxpayers to build collusive relationships.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Corruption, Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Constraints: International Firm-level Evidence
    Lopatta, Kerstin
    Jaeschke, Reemda
    Tchikov, Magdalena
    Lodhia, Sumit
    EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2017, 14 (01) : 47 - 65
  • [22] Political incentives and pollution reduction in China: Evidence from firm-level emissions data
    Chan, Charlie
    Fei, Long
    Kandilov, Ivan T.
    Zhang, Chi
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2025, 144
  • [23] Technological spillover through industrial and regional linkages: Firm-level evidence from China
    Hu, Yong
    Fisher-Vanden, Karen
    Su, Baozhong
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2020, 89 : 523 - 545
  • [24] Aid and growth: evidence from firm-level data
    Chauvet, Lisa
    Ehrhart, Helene
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2018, 135 : 461 - 477
  • [25] High-speed rail and inventory reduction: firm-level evidence from China
    Cui, Chuantao
    Li, Leona Shao-Zhi
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (25) : 2715 - 2730
  • [26] Corruption and Productivity: Firm-level Evidence
    De Rosa, Donato
    Gooroochurn, Nishaal
    Goerg, Holger
    JAHRBUCHER FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE UND STATISTIK, 2015, 235 (02): : 115 - 138
  • [27] Firm-level determinants of tax evasion in transition economies
    Abdixhiku, Lumir
    Krasniqi, Besnik
    Pugh, Geoff
    Hashi, Iraj
    ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, 2017, 41 (03) : 354 - 366
  • [28] Exploring the Impact of Firm-level Legality on Tax Avoidance
    Ginesti, Gianluca
    Ballestra, Luca Vincenzo
    Macchioni, Riccardo
    EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 17 (02) : 499 - 514
  • [29] Standards, trade margins and product quality: Firm-level evidence from Peru
    Curzi, Daniele
    Schuster, Monica
    Maertens, Miet
    Olper, Alessandro
    FOOD POLICY, 2020, 91
  • [30] Corruption, innovation and firm growth: firm-level evidence from Egypt and Tunisia
    Micheline Goedhuys
    Pierre Mohnen
    Tamer Taha
    Eurasian Business Review, 2016, 6 : 299 - 322