G-FORCE: the effectiveness of group psychotherapy for Cluster-C personality disorders: protocol of a pragmatic RCT comparing psychodynamic and two forms of schema group therapy

被引:2
作者
van den Heuvel, Birre B. [1 ]
Dekker, Jack J. M. [2 ]
Daniels, M. [1 ]
Van, Henricus L. [1 ]
Peen, Jaap [1 ]
Bosmans, Judith [3 ]
Arntz, Arnoud [4 ]
Huibers, Marcus J. H. [5 ]
机构
[1] Arkin Mental Hlth Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Fac Sci, Dept Hlth Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Utrecht, Dept Clin Psychol, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Personality disorders; Group psychotherapy; Randomized controlled trial; Pragmatic trial; Schema therapy; Group schema therapy; Psychodynamic group therapy; Working mechanisms; Cluster-C; STRUCTURED CLINICAL INTERVIEW; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; CHILDHOOD TRAUMA; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; GROUP QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF-REPORT; SHORT-TERM; AXIS II; VALIDITY; INVENTORY;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-023-07309-w
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Cluster-C personality disorders (PDs), characterized by a high level of fear and anxiety, are related to high levels of distress, societal dysfunctioning and chronicity of various mental health disorders. Evidence for the optimal treatment is extremely scarce. Nevertheless, the need to treat these patients is eminent. In clinical practice, group therapy is one of the frequently offered approaches, with two important frameworks: schema therapy and psychodynamic therapy. These two frameworks suggest different mechanisms of change, but until now, this has not yet been explored. The purpose of the present G-FORCE trial is to find evidence on the differential (cost)effectiveness of two forms of schema group therapy and psychodynamic group therapy in the routine clinical setting of an outpatient clinic and to investigate the underlying working mechanisms and predictors of outcome of these therapies.Methods In this mono-centre pragmatic randomized clinical trial, 290 patients with Cluster-C PDs or other specified PD with predominantly Cluster-C traits, will be randomized to one of three treatment conditions: group schema therapy for Cluster-C (GST-C, 1 year), schema-focused group therapy (SFGT, 1.5 year) or psychodynamic group therapy (PG, 2 years). Randomization will be pre-stratified on the type of PD. Change in severity of PD (APD-IV) over 24 months will be the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures are personality functioning, psychiatric symptoms and quality of life. Potential predictors and mediators are selected and measured repeatedly. Also, a cost-effectiveness study will be performed, primarily based on a societal perspective, using both clinical effects and quality-adjusted life years. The time-points of assessment are at baseline, start of treatment and after 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months.Discussion This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three formats of group psychotherapy for Cluster-C PDs. Additionally, predictors, procedure and process variables are analysed to investigate the working mechanisms of the therapies. This is the first large RCT on group therapy for Cluster-C PDs and will contribute improving the care of this neglected patient group. The absence of a control group can be considered as a limitation.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 107 条
  • [11] Psychometric properties and validity of the Dutch Inventory of Personality Organization (IPO-NL)
    Berghuis, Han
    Kamphuis, Jan H.
    Boedijn, Gerard
    Verheul, Roel
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE MENNINGER CLINIC, 2009, 73 (01) : 44 - 60
  • [12] Berk TJ., 2005, LEERBOEK GROEPSYCHOT
  • [13] Bernstein D.P., 1998, ASSESSMENT FAMILY VI
  • [14] Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire
    Bernstein, DP
    Stein, JA
    Newcomb, MD
    Walker, E
    Pogge, D
    Ahluvalia, T
    Stokes, J
    Handelsman, L
    Medrano, M
    Desmond, D
    Zule, W
    [J]. CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2003, 27 (02) : 169 - 190
  • [15] Blackmore C., 2011, Group Analysis, V45, P46, DOI DOI 10.1177/0533316411424356
  • [16] Individual Differences in Response to Once Versus Twice Weekly Sessions of CBT and IPT for Depression
    Bruijniks, Sanne J. E.
    van Bronswijk, Suzanne C.
    DeRubeis, Robert J.
    Delgadillo, Jaime
    Cuijpers, Pim
    Huibers, Marcus J. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 90 (01) : 5 - 17
  • [17] Mechanistic pathways of change in twice weekly versus once weekly sessions of psychotherapy for depression
    Bruijniks, Sanne J. E.
    Meeter, Martijn
    Lemmens, Lotte
    Peeters, Frenk
    Cuijpers, Pim
    Renner, Fritz
    Huibers, Marcus J. H.
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2022, 151
  • [18] Burlingame G.M., 2011, A Guide to Psychotherapy Relationships That Work, V2
  • [19] Small Group Process and Outcome Research Highlights: A 25-Year Perspective
    Burlingame, Gary M.
    Jensen, Jennifer L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2017, 67 : S194 - S218
  • [20] Childhood trauma and treatment outcome in bipolar disorder
    Cakir, Sibel
    Durak, Rumeysa Tasdelen
    Ozyildirim, Ilker
    Ince, Ezgi
    Sar, Vedat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & DISSOCIATION, 2016, 17 (04) : 397 - 409