G-FORCE: the effectiveness of group psychotherapy for Cluster-C personality disorders: protocol of a pragmatic RCT comparing psychodynamic and two forms of schema group therapy

被引:2
作者
van den Heuvel, Birre B. [1 ]
Dekker, Jack J. M. [2 ]
Daniels, M. [1 ]
Van, Henricus L. [1 ]
Peen, Jaap [1 ]
Bosmans, Judith [3 ]
Arntz, Arnoud [4 ]
Huibers, Marcus J. H. [5 ]
机构
[1] Arkin Mental Hlth Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Fac Sci, Dept Hlth Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Utrecht, Dept Clin Psychol, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Personality disorders; Group psychotherapy; Randomized controlled trial; Pragmatic trial; Schema therapy; Group schema therapy; Psychodynamic group therapy; Working mechanisms; Cluster-C; STRUCTURED CLINICAL INTERVIEW; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; CHILDHOOD TRAUMA; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; GROUP QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF-REPORT; SHORT-TERM; AXIS II; VALIDITY; INVENTORY;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-023-07309-w
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Cluster-C personality disorders (PDs), characterized by a high level of fear and anxiety, are related to high levels of distress, societal dysfunctioning and chronicity of various mental health disorders. Evidence for the optimal treatment is extremely scarce. Nevertheless, the need to treat these patients is eminent. In clinical practice, group therapy is one of the frequently offered approaches, with two important frameworks: schema therapy and psychodynamic therapy. These two frameworks suggest different mechanisms of change, but until now, this has not yet been explored. The purpose of the present G-FORCE trial is to find evidence on the differential (cost)effectiveness of two forms of schema group therapy and psychodynamic group therapy in the routine clinical setting of an outpatient clinic and to investigate the underlying working mechanisms and predictors of outcome of these therapies.Methods In this mono-centre pragmatic randomized clinical trial, 290 patients with Cluster-C PDs or other specified PD with predominantly Cluster-C traits, will be randomized to one of three treatment conditions: group schema therapy for Cluster-C (GST-C, 1 year), schema-focused group therapy (SFGT, 1.5 year) or psychodynamic group therapy (PG, 2 years). Randomization will be pre-stratified on the type of PD. Change in severity of PD (APD-IV) over 24 months will be the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures are personality functioning, psychiatric symptoms and quality of life. Potential predictors and mediators are selected and measured repeatedly. Also, a cost-effectiveness study will be performed, primarily based on a societal perspective, using both clinical effects and quality-adjusted life years. The time-points of assessment are at baseline, start of treatment and after 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months.Discussion This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three formats of group psychotherapy for Cluster-C PDs. Additionally, predictors, procedure and process variables are analysed to investigate the working mechanisms of the therapies. This is the first large RCT on group therapy for Cluster-C PDs and will contribute improving the care of this neglected patient group. The absence of a control group can be considered as a limitation.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 107 条
  • [1] Toward Brief "Red Flags" for Autism Screening: The Short Autism Spectrum Quotient and the Short Quantitative Checklist in 1,000 Cases and 3,000 Controls
    Allison, Carrie
    Auyeung, Bonnie
    Baron-Cohen, Simon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 51 (02) : 202 - 212
  • [2] Andrea H., 2009, HDB PERSOONLIJKHEIDS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of schema therapy: Theory, research, and practice
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2012, Group schema therapy for borderline personality disorder: A step-by-step treatment manual with patient workbook, DOI [10.1002/9781119943167, DOI 10.1002/9781119943167]
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2000, PSYCHOPRAXIS, DOI [10.1007/bf03071865, DOI 10.1007/BF03071865]
  • [6] Arntz A., 2017, SCID-5-P: Gestructureerd klinisch interview voor DSM-5 Persoonlijkheidsstoornissen: Nederlandse vertaling van Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (SCID-5-PD) en User's Guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (SCID-5-PD)
  • [7] Arntz A., 2012, Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, V3, P189, DOI DOI 10.5127/JEP.024211
  • [8] Group schema therapy for patients with cluster-C personality disorders: A case study on avoidant personality disorder
    Bachrach, Nathan
    Arntz, Arnoud
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 77 (05) : 1233 - 1248
  • [9] Group schema therapy versus group cognitive behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder with comorbid avoidant personality disorder: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Balje, Astrid
    Greeven, Anja
    van Giezen, Anne
    Korrelboom, Kees
    Arntz, Arnoud
    Spinhoven, Philip
    [J]. TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [10] Economic Evaluation of Schema Therapy and Clarification-Oriented Psychotherapy for Personality Disorders: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bamelis, Lotte L. M.
    Arntz, Arnoud
    Wetzelaer, Pim
    Verdoorn, Ryanne
    Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 76 (11) : E1432 - +