Common errors, pitfalls, and management of complications of prostate biopsy The most common diagnostic and procedural challenges of transrectal fusion prostate biopsy in the initial diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Enzinger, Benazir [1 ]
Pfitzinger, Paulo Leonardo [1 ]
Ebner, Benedikt [1 ]
Ivanova, Troya [1 ]
Volz, Yannic [1 ]
Apfelbeck, Maria [1 ]
Kazmierczak, Philipp [2 ]
Stief, Christian [1 ]
Chaloupka, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] LMU Klinikum, Urol Klin & Poliklin, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] LMU Klinikum, Klinik & Poliklin Radiol, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
来源
UROLOGIE | 2023年 / 62卷 / 05期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Risk stratification; Fusion biopsy; Transperineal approach; Infections; ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS; RISK CALCULATOR; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1007/s00120-023-02063-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Transrectal (TR) prostate biopsy is the gold standard in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). It requires a precise and safe technique for sample acquisition.Objective: Several approaches will be discussed to avoid overdiagnosis, false-negative results, and complications of the procedure.Materials and methods: We analyzed national and European guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, as well as prospective and retrospective studies to describe current trends in indication and performance of biopsies.Results: Incorporation of risk calculators and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into daily routine reduces biopsy rates and results in a more precise diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC). Combination of random- and MRI-fusion guided biopsy-but also extending the radius of sampling by 10 mm beyond the MRI lesion and a transperineal (TP) sampling approach - lead to a higher tumor-detection rate. Bleeding is the most common complication after prostate biopsy and is usually self-limiting. Postbiopsy infection rates can be reduced through TP biopsy.Conclusion: TR MRI-fusion guided biopsy is a widely acknowledged tool in primary diagnostics of csPC. Higher detection rates and safety can be achieved through a TP sampling approach.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 486
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diagnostic performance of prostate cancer antigen 3 and the Prostate Health Index in detecting overall and clinically significant prostate cancer in men at first biopsy: A meta-analysis
    Jia, Wei
    Wu, Bo
    Shao, Yuan
    Cao, Xiaoming
    Wang, Dongwen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) : 315 - 325
  • [22] In-bore magnetic resonance-guided transrectal biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Ely R. Felker
    Stephanie A. Lee-Felker
    John Feller
    Daniel J. Margolis
    David S. Lu
    Robert Princenthal
    Stuart May
    Martin Cohen
    Jiaoti Huang
    Jeffrey Yoshida
    Bernadette Greenwood
    Hyun J. Kim
    Steven S. Raman
    Abdominal Radiology, 2016, 41 : 954 - 962
  • [23] In-bore magnetic resonance-guided transrectal biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Felker, Ely R.
    Lee-Felker, Stephanie A.
    Feller, John
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Lu, David S.
    Princenthal, Robert
    May, Stuart
    Cohen, Martin
    Huang, Jiaoti
    Yoshida, Jeffrey
    Greenwood, Bernadette
    Kim, Hyun J.
    Raman, Steven S.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 41 (05) : 954 - 962
  • [24] THE COGNITIVE FUSION PROSTATE BIOPSY USING A SMART PHONE IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATE CANCER
    Yalcin, Serdar
    Kaya, Engin
    Ebiloglu, Turgay
    Akay, Sinan
    Zor, Murat
    Sarikaya, Selcuk
    Yilmaz, Sercan
    Bedir, Selahattin
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2019, 72 (10): : 1026 - 1031
  • [25] Association of metabolic syndrome with prostate cancer diagnosis and aggressiveness in patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy
    Fragkoulis, Charalampos
    Glykas, Ioannis
    Tzelves, Lazaros
    Stasinopoulos, Konstantinos
    Lazarou, Lazaros
    Kaoukis, Andreas
    Dellis, Athanasios
    Stathouros, Georgios
    Papadopoulos, Georgios
    Ntoumas, Konstantinos
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2021, 93 (03) : 291 - 295
  • [26] Combination of fusion guided multiparametric MRI-transrectal US with systematic biopsy of the prostate for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: A prospective single-center study
    Agrotis, Georgios
    Tsougos, Ioannis
    Oikonomou, Athanasios
    Vassiou, Katerina
    Karatzas, Anastasios
    Tamposis, Ioannis
    Fanariotis, Michalis
    Vamvakas, Alexandros
    Tzortzis, Vasilis
    Vlychou, Marianna
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2023, 51 (06) : 1101 - 1111
  • [27] Is systematic sextant biopsy suitable for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer?
    Manseck, A
    Froehner, M
    Oehlschlaeger, S
    Hakenberg, O
    Friedrich, K
    Theissig, F
    Wirth, MP
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2000, 65 (02) : 80 - 83
  • [28] Diagnostic Place Value of the multiparametric MRI with targeted Fusion Biopsy of the Prostate in Patients with PSA Increase and negative Stamping Biopsy for the Detection of clinically significant Prostate Carcinomas Correlation with the Gleason Score
    Hoffmann, Manuela A.
    Wieler, Helmut J.
    Jakobs, Frank M.
    Taymoorian, Kasra
    Gerhards, Arnd
    Miederer, Matthias
    Schreckenberger, Mathias
    NUKLEARMEDIZIN-NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2017, 56 (04): : 147 - 155
  • [29] Influence of biopsy cores number performed with targeted prostate biopsy on the likelihood of a positive result in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer
    Zyryanov, A., V
    Gulin, G. A.
    Rubtsova, N. A.
    Mager, V. O.
    Putintsev, A. E.
    Kuznetsova, S. G.
    Kuznetsova, D. D.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2020, 16 (03): : 62 - 69
  • [30] Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Borkowetz, Angelika
    Platzek, Ivan
    Toma, Marieta
    Laniado, Michael
    Baretton, Gustavo
    Froehner, Michael
    Koch, Rainer
    Wirth, Manfred
    Zastrow, Stefan
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 (06) : 873 - 879