Greenhouse gas footprint assessment of wood-based panel production in China

被引:15
|
作者
Lao, Wan-Li [1 ]
Chang, Liang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Forestry, Res Inst Wood Ind, Beijing 100091, Peoples R China
[2] Xiangshan Rd, Beijing 100091, Peoples R China
关键词
GHG footprint; Wood-based panels; Biogenic carbon; Delayed emissions; Emission-reduction measures; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ORIENTED STRAND BOARDS; PARTICLEBOARD PRODUCTION; MANUFACTURING PROCESS; EMISSIONS; INVENTORY; PROFILE; ENERGY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136064
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China is one of the largest manufacturers, consumers, and traders of wood-based panels (WBPs) globally. The Chinese manufacturing process for WBPs is significantly different from that used in other countries and the greenhouse gas (GHG) footprint assessment of this process has not yet received attention. And a comprehensive evaluation of the effect of different approaches to estimate the delayed emission of biogenic carbon on the GHG footprints of different WBP types is still missing. This study aims to quantify: i) the GHG footprint of WBPs produced in China, and ii) the influence of different methods to assess the delayed emission of biogenic carbon. Cradle-to-gate life cycle models are developed for plywood (PLY), fiberboard (FB), particleboard (PB) and ori-ented strand boards (OSB). Based on two common end-of-life (EoL) destinations (i.e., incineration and landfill), three approaches to the estimation of the delayed emissions of biogenic carbon in cradle-to-grave assessments are compared. The cradle-to-gate results show that the GHG footprints of PLY, FB, PB and OSB without considering biogenic carbon storage are 538 kg CO2 e/m3, 406 kg CO2 e/m3, 348 kg CO2 e/m3 and 552 kg CO2 e/m3, respectively. For the four types of WBPs, resources extraction stage provides the largest contribution to the GHG footprints (55%-81%), followed by the production process (18%-31%) and raw material transportation (1%- 18%). The methodologies used to assess delayed emissions in cradle-to-grave WBP GHG footprint assessments play an important role, especially for incineration scenarios. Finally, emission reduction measures are proposed based on reducing the consumption of adhesives and of energy use in the production process.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Structural Decomposition Analysis of China's Consumption-Based Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    Gao, Haidi
    Gu, Alun
    Wang, Gehua
    Teng, Fei
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (15)
  • [42] Supply Cost and Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Footprint of Dry and Ensiled Biomass Sorghum for Biofuel Production
    Baral, Nawa Raj
    Dahlberg, Jeff
    Putnam, Daniel
    Mortimer, Jenny C.
    Scown, Corinne D.
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2020, 8 (42): : 15855 - 15864
  • [43] Indicators of environmental performance to assess wood-based bioenergy production: A case study in Northern Italy
    Buonocore, Elvira
    Paletto, Alessandro
    Russo, Giovanni F.
    Franzese, Pier Paolo
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 221 : 242 - 248
  • [44] Investigating historical dynamics and mitigation scenarios of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions from pig production system in China
    Chen, Xiaowei
    Chen, Yun
    Liu, Xingxing
    Li, Yuliang
    Wang, Xiaolong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 296
  • [45] Energy mix-driven dynamic life cycle assessment on greenhouse gas emissions of passenger cars in China
    Lu, Yu
    Liu, Qiang
    Li, Bo
    Jiang, Qiong
    Li, Qing
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 466
  • [46] Use of Wood-Based Materials in Beef Bedded Manure Packs: 1. Effect on Ammonia, Total Reduced Sulfide, and Greenhouse Gas Concentrations
    Spiehs, Mindy J.
    Brown-Brandl, Tami M.
    Parker, David B.
    Miller, Daniel N.
    Jaderborg, Jeffrey P.
    DiCostanzo, Alfredo
    Berry, Elaine D.
    Wells, James E.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2014, 43 (04) : 1187 - 1194
  • [47] Towards environmental sustainability: Life cycle assessment-based water footprint analysis on China's cotton production
    Zhang, Tianzuo
    Zhai, Yijie
    Ma, Xiaotian
    Shen, Xiaoxu
    Bai, Yueyang
    Zhang, Ruirui
    Ji, Changxing
    Hong, Jinglan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 313
  • [48] Comparison on greenhouse gas footprint of three types of oriented strand board manufacturing process in China
    Wan-Li Lao
    Xin-Fang Duan
    Xiao-Ling Li
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 78793 - 78801
  • [49] Sustainability assessment of wood-based bioenergy - A methodological framework and a case-study
    Myllyviita, Tanja
    Leskinen, Pekka
    Lahtinen, Katja
    Pasanen, Karri
    Sironen, Susanna
    Kahkonen, Tanja
    Sikanen, Lauri
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2013, 59 : 293 - 299
  • [50] Micro-Fibrillated Cellulose in Adhesive Systems for the Production of Wood-Based Panels
    Karagiannidis, Emmanouil
    Markessini, Charles
    Athanassiadou, Eleftheria
    MOLECULES, 2020, 25 (20):