Greenhouse gas footprint assessment of wood-based panel production in China

被引:15
|
作者
Lao, Wan-Li [1 ]
Chang, Liang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Forestry, Res Inst Wood Ind, Beijing 100091, Peoples R China
[2] Xiangshan Rd, Beijing 100091, Peoples R China
关键词
GHG footprint; Wood-based panels; Biogenic carbon; Delayed emissions; Emission-reduction measures; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ORIENTED STRAND BOARDS; PARTICLEBOARD PRODUCTION; MANUFACTURING PROCESS; EMISSIONS; INVENTORY; PROFILE; ENERGY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136064
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China is one of the largest manufacturers, consumers, and traders of wood-based panels (WBPs) globally. The Chinese manufacturing process for WBPs is significantly different from that used in other countries and the greenhouse gas (GHG) footprint assessment of this process has not yet received attention. And a comprehensive evaluation of the effect of different approaches to estimate the delayed emission of biogenic carbon on the GHG footprints of different WBP types is still missing. This study aims to quantify: i) the GHG footprint of WBPs produced in China, and ii) the influence of different methods to assess the delayed emission of biogenic carbon. Cradle-to-gate life cycle models are developed for plywood (PLY), fiberboard (FB), particleboard (PB) and ori-ented strand boards (OSB). Based on two common end-of-life (EoL) destinations (i.e., incineration and landfill), three approaches to the estimation of the delayed emissions of biogenic carbon in cradle-to-grave assessments are compared. The cradle-to-gate results show that the GHG footprints of PLY, FB, PB and OSB without considering biogenic carbon storage are 538 kg CO2 e/m3, 406 kg CO2 e/m3, 348 kg CO2 e/m3 and 552 kg CO2 e/m3, respectively. For the four types of WBPs, resources extraction stage provides the largest contribution to the GHG footprints (55%-81%), followed by the production process (18%-31%) and raw material transportation (1%- 18%). The methodologies used to assess delayed emissions in cradle-to-grave WBP GHG footprint assessments play an important role, especially for incineration scenarios. Finally, emission reduction measures are proposed based on reducing the consumption of adhesives and of energy use in the production process.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pyrolysis of switchgrass in an auger reactor for biochar production: A greenhouse gas and energy impacts assessment
    Brassard, Patrick
    Godbout, Stephane
    Pelletier, Frederic
    Raghavan, Vijaya
    Palacios, Joahnn H.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2018, 116 : 99 - 105
  • [32] Wood-Based Panel Industry Wastewater Meets Microbial Fuel Cell Technology
    Toczylowska-Maminska, Renata
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (07)
  • [33] CIRCULAR ECONOMY OPPORTUNITIES FOR ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT IN WOOD-BASED PANEL INDUSTRY
    Neykov, Nikolay
    Antov, Petar
    Savov, Viktor
    11TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT 2020, 2020, : 8 - 17
  • [34] Regional shifts of employment growth in the European wood-based panel and furniture industries
    Osses, T.
    Kies, U.
    Schulte, A.
    INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2013, 15 (01) : 82 - 97
  • [35] Assessment of Wood-Based Fly Ash as Alternative Cement Replacement
    Fort, Jan
    Sal, Jiri
    Zak, Jaroslav
    Cerny, Robert
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (22) : 1 - 16
  • [36] Impact of shale gas development on regional water resources in China from water footprint assessment view
    Xie, Xiaomin
    Zhang, Tingting
    Wang, Michael
    Huang, Zhen
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 679 : 317 - 327
  • [37] Nitrogen footprint and nitrogen use efficiency of greenhouse tomato production in North China
    Liang, Long
    Ridoutt, Bradley G.
    Lal, Rattan
    Wang, Dapeng
    Wu, Wenliang
    Peng, Peng
    Hang, Sheng
    Wang, Liyuan
    Zhao, Guishen
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 208 : 285 - 296
  • [38] National and global greenhouse gas dynamics of different forest management and wood use scenarios: a model-based assessment
    Werner, Frank
    Taverna, Ruedi
    Hofer, Peter
    Thuerig, Esther
    Kaufmann, Edgar
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2010, 13 (01) : 72 - 85
  • [39] Assessment of the greenhouse gas emission footprint of a biorefinery over its life cycle
    Giwa, Temitayo
    Akbari, Maryam
    Kumar, Amit
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 271
  • [40] Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of wood-based biorefineries for cellulosic ethanol production
    Qian, Qian
    Luo, Zhongyang
    Sun, Haoran
    Wei, Qi
    Shi, Jingkang
    Li, Longfei
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 399