Impact of dyadic practice on the clinical self-efficacy and empathy of nursing students

被引:5
作者
Kamali, Maryam [1 ]
Hasanvand, Shirin [2 ]
Kordestani-Moghadam, Parastou [2 ]
Ebrahimzadeh, Farzad [3 ]
Amini, Mitra [4 ]
机构
[1] Lorestan Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Khorramabad, Iran
[2] Lorestan Univ Med Sci, Social Determinants Hlth Res Ctr, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Khorramabad, Iran
[3] Lorestan Univ Med Sci, Nutr Hlth Res Ctr, Sch Hlth & Nutr, Khorramabad, Iran
[4] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Clin Educ Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
Peer learning; Empathy; Self-Efficacy; Nursing; Students; EDUCATION; INDIVIDUALS; PERFORMANCE; HEALTH; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s12912-022-01171-y
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background Dyadic practice of learners creates supportive learning. So far, few studies have investigated the impact of this approach on students' empathy and self-efficacy. This study aimed to investigate the effect of dyadic practice on nursing students' clinical self-efficacy and empathy. Methods This study was based on a pretest-posttest randomized group from September to December 2018. All the junior nursing students (n = 44) were divided into intervention (n = 22) and control groups (n = 22) using stratified random sampling. The intervention group was trained for 6 days as student dyads, while the control group was under the supervision of an instructor and worked individually. The students' levels of empathy and self-efficacy were evaluated on the first day (pretest) and the last day (post-test) by The Self-Efficacy in Clinical Performance Scale and Mehrabian and Epstein empathy scale. The data were analyzed using the SPSS software by Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney test, independent t-test paired t-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank, and Analysis of covariance. Results Dyadic practice increased empathy in the intervention group compared to the control group (P < 0.001). The adjusted mean of total empathy in the intervention group was 21.1 degrees higher than the adjusted mean of total empathy in the control group. However, no significant differences were found between the two groups in clinical self-efficacy (P = 0.762). Conclusions The employment of this approach seems helpful in creating an empathic atmosphere. However, further studies are required to prove the effectiveness of this method on self-efficacy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Comparison of dyad versus individual simulation-based training on stress, anxiety, cognitive load, and performance: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Abbott, Eduardo F. ;
Laack, Torrey A. ;
Licatino, Lauren K. ;
Wood-Wentz, Christina M. ;
Warner, Paul A. ;
Torsher, Laurence C. ;
Newman, James S. ;
Rieck, Katie M. .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 21 (01)
[2]  
Abdal M, 2015, NURS MIDWIFERY STUD, V4, DOI 10.17795/nmsjournal29143
[3]   Level of motivation and physical activity in primary education students [J].
Alvarinas-Villaverde, Myriam ;
Portela-Pino, Iago ;
Soto-Carballo, Jorge .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN SPORT AND EXERCISE, 2018, 13 :S467-S476
[4]   Academic self-efficacy: from educational theory to instructional practice [J].
Artino, Anthony R., Jr. .
PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 1 (02) :76-85
[5]  
Austria Mary Jean, 2013, Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh, V10, DOI 10.1515/ijnes-2012-0026
[6]  
Bagnasco A, 2012, HJNS, V4, P4
[7]   Impact of the peer education model on nursing students' anxiety and psychomotor skill performance: A quasi-experimental study [J].
Bahar, A. ;
Kocacal, E. ;
Maras, G. .
NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 25 (05) :677-682
[8]   PERCEIVED SELF-EFFICACY IN COGNITIVE-DEVELOPMENT AND FUNCTIONING [J].
BANDURA, A .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 1993, 28 (02) :117-148
[9]   Impact of peer teaching on nursing students: Perceptions of learning environment, self-efficacy, and knowledge [J].
Brannagan, Kim B. ;
Dellinger, Amy ;
Thomas, Jan ;
Mitchell, Denise ;
Lewis-Trabeaux, Shirleen ;
Dupre, Susan .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2013, 33 (11) :1440-1447
[10]   Developing a valid and reliable self-efficacy in clinical performance scale [J].
Cheraghi, F. ;
Hassani, P. ;
Yaghmaei, F. ;
Alavi-Majed, H. .
INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2009, 56 (02) :214-221