Clustering of Cities Based on Their Smart Performances: A Comparative Approach of Fuzzy C-Means, K-Means, and K-Medoids

被引:6
作者
Kenger, Omer N. [1 ]
Kenger, Zulal Diri [1 ]
Ozceylan, Eren [2 ]
Mrugalska, Beata [3 ]
机构
[1] Hasan Kalyoncu Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-27010 Gaziantep, Turkiye
[2] Gaziantep Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-27310 Gaziantep, Turkiye
[3] Poznan Univ Tech, Fac Engn Management, PL-60965 Poznan, Poland
关键词
Comparative analysis; clustering; fuzzy C-Means; K-Means; K-Medoids; smart cities; TECHNOLOGY; ALGORITHMS; ROADMAP;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3333753
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Smart City is recognized as a potential approach to address serious urban issues such as traffic, pollution, energy use, and waste management. Therefore, it is vital to evaluate how smart cities are in order to put these methods into practice. To offer advice on these matters, numerous reports are created, and one of which is Smart City Index (SCI). The Institute for Management Development (IMD) and the Singapore University of Technology and Design collaborate on SCI every year (SUTD). The report evaluates how locals view the buildings and technological applications that are available in their towns. Although the study offers a thorough examination of the cities for evaluation, the city clusters should be more sensitive and not be created using strict clustering techniques. In order to address this problem, the clustering algorithms namely K-Medoids, Fuzzy C-Means, and K-Means, which outperform hard clustering approaches in terms of robustness to vagueness and knowledge retention, are used. The main goal of this study is to categorize cities using a scientific manner (clustering algorithms) based on SCI data and to present how the chosen approaches work for dealing with the associated problems. The primary innovation of the present study is the use of clustering techniques in reports where the indexes are used. The results indicate that grouping the cities on the basis of their smart indicators would not be as effective as using the three clustering techniques that are suggested in this paper. These results add to the analysis of the dynamic capacities of smart cities and highlight the sustainability of these tactics.
引用
收藏
页码:134446 / 134459
页数:14
相关论文
共 69 条
[11]  
Bezdek J. C., 1981, Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms
[12]  
Borys D., 2017, Proc. SPIE, V10341, P232
[13]  
Bose A, 2018, 2018 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS, MATERIALS ENGINEERING & NANO-TECHNOLOGY (IEMENTECH), P96
[14]   How Local Policy Priorities Set the Smart City Agenda [J].
Clement, Jessica ;
Crutzen, Nathalie .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 171
[15]   Data Mining and Machine Learning to Promote Smart Cities: A Systematic Review from 2000 to 2018 [J].
de Souza, Jovani Taveira ;
de Francisco, Antonio Carlos ;
Piekarski, Cassiano Moro ;
do Prado, Guilherme Francisco .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (04)
[16]  
Dharmarajan A., 2015, INDIAN J SCI TECHNOL, V8, P974, DOI 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i15/73329
[17]  
Doreswamy G. O. A., 2018, In Proceedings of International Conference on Cognition and Recognition: ICCR 2016, P21
[18]  
Farafisha S., 2021, P 1 INT SEM TEACH TR, P17
[19]  
Ghosh S, 2013, INT J ADV COMPUT SC, V4, P35
[20]   Application of k-means and hierarchical clustering techniques for analysis of air pollution: A review (1980-2019) [J].
Govender, P. ;
Sivakumar, V .
ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 11 (01) :40-56