Empirically-based dynamic risk and protective factors for sexual offending

被引:16
作者
Seto, Michael C. [1 ,3 ]
Augustyn, Carissa [1 ]
Roche, Kailey M. [1 ]
Hilkes, Gabriella [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawas, Inst Mental Hlth Res Royal, 1145 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON K1Z 7K4, Canada
[2] Carleton Univ, 1125 Colonel Dr, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawas, Inst Mental Hlth Res, 1145 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON K1Z 7K4, Canada
关键词
Sexual offending; Dynamic risk assessment; Risk factors; Protective factors; Intervention; CHILD MOLESTERS; RECIDIVISM; METAANALYSIS; STATIC-99R; DESISTANCE; MEN; HISTORY; ABUSE; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102355
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This review provides an overview and update of empirical evidence for psychologically meaningful dynamic risk factors and protective factors for sexual offending. Using the review by Mann et al. (2010) as a starting point, we reviewed relevant literature that has appeared since this publication, focusing on meta-analyses, systematic and scoping reviews of dynamic risk factors, recent evaluations of commonly used dynamic assessment tools, and studies of dynamic risk and protective factors in community samples in addition to clinical or forensic samples. Two risk factors previously deemed promising by Mann et al. (2010), hostility towards women and dysfunctional coping (conceptualized as hostile masculinity and emotional regulation deficits, respectively, in this review), could now be considered supported using this review's criteria of three or more studies demonstrating an effect size of 0.15 or greater. No new risk factors were identified. We conducted a broader search of protective factors in recognition of the relative newness of this literature: Positive social support was the only protective factor identified as empirically supported. We also discuss situational risk and protective factors.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [11] The motivations of female child sexual offenders: A systematic review of the literature
    Brown, Kelly M.
    Kloess, Juliane A.
    [J]. AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR, 2020, 50
  • [12] The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF): A Meta-Analysis of Its Predictive and Incremental Validity
    Burghart, Matthias
    de Ruiter, Corine
    Hynes, Sophia Elianne
    Krishnan, Nishant
    Levtova, Yara
    Uyar, Abdo
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2023, 35 (01) : 56 - 67
  • [13] Caldwell Michael F, 2002, Child Maltreat, V7, P291, DOI 10.1177/107755902237260
  • [14] Casey E., 2017, SEXUAL VIOLENCE RISK
  • [15] Situational Crime Prevention in Sexual Offenses Against Women: Offenders Tell Us What Works and What Doesn't
    Chiu, Yi-Ning
    Leclerc, Benoit
    Reynald, Danielle M.
    Wortley, Richard
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2021, 65 (09) : 1055 - 1076
  • [16] Circles of Support and Accountability for Sex Offenders: A Systematic Review of Outcomes
    Clarke, Martin
    Brown, Susan
    Vollm, Birgit
    [J]. SEXUAL ABUSE-A JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 29 (05) : 446 - 478
  • [17] Theoretical and practical issues for the measurement of protective factors
    Cording, Jacinta R.
    Christofferson, Sarah M. Beggs
    [J]. AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR, 2017, 32 : 45 - 54
  • [18] The Recidivism Rates of Female Sexual Offenders Are Low: A Meta-Analysis
    Cortoni, Franca
    Hanson, R. Karl
    Coache, Marie-Eve
    [J]. SEXUAL ABUSE-A JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2010, 22 (04) : 387 - 401
  • [19] de Vogel V., 2012, SAPROF. Guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk
  • [20] Dempster Rebecca J, 2002, Sex Abuse, V14, P121, DOI 10.1177/107906320201400204