Amendments of Severe Saline-Sodic Paddy Land: Optimal Combination of Phosphogypsum, Farmyard Fertilizer, and Wood Peat

被引:5
作者
Duan, Guokang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Miao [1 ,3 ]
Liang, Zhengwei [1 ,3 ]
Wang, Mingming [1 ,3 ]
Yang, Haoyu [1 ,3 ]
Xu, Yang [1 ,3 ]
Yu, Tianhe [1 ,3 ]
Jin, Yangyang [1 ,3 ]
Hu, Jiafeng [1 ,3 ]
Liu, Junqing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Northeast Inst Geog & Agroecol, Changchun 130102, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Jilin Daan Farmland Ecosyst Natl Observat & Res St, Daan 131317, Peoples R China
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 05期
关键词
severe saline-sodic land; amendment; rice; theoretical yield; SATIVA L. GROWTH; SONGNEN PLAIN; SOIL; YIELD; GYPSUM; RECLAMATION;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy13051364
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
We aimed to determine the optimal combination of amendments to increase rice yields in saline-sodic soil. The effects of different proportions of phosphogypsum (P), farmyard fertilizer (F), and wood peat (W) across the main growth period of rice were studied. A total of 14 treatments were designed based on the "3414" fertilizer effect field experiment scheme, with 3 factors (P, F, and W) and 4 application levels per factor. Application of a combination of P, F, and W reduced soil pH and electrical conductance (EC) (p < 0.05), increasing rice yields. The theoretical rice yield after treatment P2F2W2 (P 30, F 50, and W30 t center dot ha(-1)) was 5819.20 kg center dot ha(-1), which was 32.52-fold higher than that after P0F0W0 (P, F, and W, 0 t center dot ha(-1)). Panicle weight, number of total filled grains, total grain weight, and seed-setting rate were 9.76, 17.35, 32.11, and 3.96 times higher than those in the control treatment, respectively. Compared with the control P0F0W0 treatment, soil pH in P2F2W2 in 0-5, 5-10, 10-15, and 15-20 cm depth decreased by 12.69, 12.32, 11.18, and 10.70%, respectively, and soil EC was 1.06-fold, and 70.79, 49.30, and 47.76% higher, respectively. Overall, we found that the P2F2W2 treatment, with a combination of P, 29.09-32.38 t center dot ha(-1); F, 40.36-46.97 t center dot ha(-1); and W, 19.57-23.95 t center dot ha(-1) was optimal in this experiment.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Conversion of phosphogypsum to potassium sulfate - Part I. The effect of temperature on the solubility of calcium sulfate in concentrated aqueous chloride solutions [J].
Aagli, A ;
Tamer, N ;
Atbir, A ;
Boukbir, L ;
El Hadek, M .
JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2005, 82 (02) :395-399
[2]   Implication of Gypsum Rates to Optimize Hydraulic Conductivity for Variable-Texture Saline-Sodic Soils Reclamation [J].
Ahmad, Sagheer ;
Ghafoor, Abdul ;
Akhtar, Muhammad E. ;
Khan, Muhammad Z. .
LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 27 (03) :550-560
[3]   Effect of phosphogypsum application and bacteria co-inoculation on biochemical properties and nutrient availability to maize plants in a saline soil [J].
Al-Enazy, Abdul-Aziz ;
Al-Barakah, Fahad ;
Al-Oud, Saud ;
Usman, Adel .
ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2018, 64 (10) :1394-1406
[4]   The Influence of Organic and Mineral Fertilizers on the Quality of Soil Organic Matter and Glomalin Content [J].
Balik, Jiri ;
Kulhanek, Martin ;
Cerny, Jindrich ;
Sedlar, Ondrej ;
Suran, Pavel ;
Asrade, Dinkayehu Alamnie .
AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (06)
[5]   Mitigating Soil Salinity Stress with Gypsum and Bio-Organic Amendments: A Review [J].
Bello, Suleiman K. ;
Alayafi, Abdullah H. ;
AL-Solaimani, Samir G. ;
Abo-Elyousr, Kamal A. M. .
AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (09)
[6]  
Cao X., 2015, STRATEGY POLICY DECI, V33, P441
[7]   Reclamation of saline-sodic soil properties and improvement of rice (Oriza sativa L.) growth and yield using desulfurized gypsum in the west of Songnen Plain, northeast China [J].
Chi, C. M. ;
Zhao, C. W. ;
Sun, X. J. ;
Wang, Z. C. .
GEODERMA, 2012, 187 :24-30
[8]   Changes in chemical and biological properties of a sodic clay subsoil with addition of organic amendments [J].
Clark, G. J. ;
Dodgshun, N. ;
Sale, P. W. G. ;
Tang, C. .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2007, 39 (11) :2806-2817
[9]  
Cong S., 2022, EFFECTS DIFFERENT AM
[10]  
Dobermann A., 2000, RICE ECOSYSTEMS RICE, P2