Wall shear stress measurement using a zero-displacement floating-element balance

被引:5
作者
Aguiar Ferreira, M. [1 ]
Costa, P. [2 ]
Ganapathisubramani, B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Proc & Energy, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, Dept Engn Eletrotecn & Comp, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Univ Southampton, Dept Aeronaut & Astronaut, Southampton, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
TURBULENT-BOUNDARY-LAYER; SKIN-FRICTION; ROUGH-WALL; FLOW; MOTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00348-024-03785-1
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The floating-element (FE) principle, introduced nearly a century ago, remains one of the most versatile direct wall shear stress measurement methods. Yet, its intrinsic sources of systematic error, associated with the flow-exposed gap, off-axis load sensitivity, and calibration, have thus far limited its widespread application. In combination with the lack of standard designs and testing procedures, measurement reliability still hinges heavily on individual judgement and expertise. This paper presents a framework to curb these limitations, whereby the design and operation of a FE balance are leveraged by an analytical model that attempts to capture the behaviour and predict the relative contribution of the systematic sources of error. The design is based on a parallel-shift linkage and a zero-displacement force-feedback system. The FE has a surface area of 200 x 200 mm, and measurement sensitivity is adjustable depending on the surface condition and the Reynolds number. It is thus suitable for application in a wide range of low-speed, boundary-layer wind tunnels, small or large scale. Measurements of the skin friction coefficient over a smooth wall show a remarkable agreement with oil-film interferometry, especially for Re-theta > 1.3 x 10(4). The discrepancy relative to the empirical Coles-Fernholz relation (kappa = 0.39 and C = 4.352) is within 0.5%, and the level of uncertainty is below 1% for a confidence interval of 95%.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   DEVELOPMENT OF A FLOATING ELEMENT FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF SURFACE SHEAR-STRESS [J].
ACHARYA, M ;
BORNSTEIN, J ;
ESCUDIER, MP ;
VOKURKA, V .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1985, 23 (03) :410-415
[2]   EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY OF ERROR SOURCES IN SKIN-FRICTION BALANCE MEASUREMENTS [J].
ALLEN, JM .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1977, 99 (01) :197-204
[3]   IMPROVED SENSING ELEMENT FOR SKIN-FRICTION BALANCE MEASUREMENTS [J].
ALLEN, JM .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1980, 18 (11) :1342-1345
[4]   Wall-drag measurements of smooth- and rough-wall turbulent boundary layers using a floating element [J].
Baars, W. J. ;
Squire, D. T. ;
Talluru, K. M. ;
Abbassi, M. R. ;
Hutchins, N. ;
Marusic, I. .
EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2016, 57 (05)
[5]   MEASUREMENT OF SKIN FRICTION IN TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYERS WITH ADVERSE PRESSURE GRADIENTS [J].
BROWN, KC ;
JOUBERT, PN .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1969, 35 :737-&
[6]   Near wall flow over urban-like roughness [J].
Cheng, H ;
Castro, IP .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2002, 104 (02) :229-259
[7]  
Clauser F.H., 1956, Adv. Appl. Mech, V4, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70370-3
[8]  
Dhawan S, 1951, Direct measurements of skin friction, DOI [10.7907/1S03-8631, DOI 10.7907/1S03-8631]
[9]   Accurate Measurements of Wall Shear Stress on a Plate with Elliptic Leading Edge [J].
Ding, Guang-Hui ;
Ma, Bing-He ;
Deng, Jin-Jun ;
Yuan, Wei-Zheng ;
Liu, Kang .
SENSORS, 2018, 18 (08)
[10]   Mean flow of turbulent boundary layers over porous substrates [J].
Esteban, L. B. ;
Rodriguez-Lopez, E. ;
Ferreira, M. A. ;
Ganapathisubramani, B. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW FLUIDS, 2022, 7 (09)