Advancing environmental assessment of the circular economy: Challenges and opportunities

被引:7
作者
Ravikumar, Dwarakanath [1 ]
Keoleian, Gregory A. [2 ]
Walzberg, Julien [3 ]
Heath, Garvin [3 ]
Heller, Martin C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainable Engn & Built Environm, 660 S Coll Ave, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ctr Sustainable Syst, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Dana Bldg,440 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Natl Renewable Energy Lab NREL, 15013 Denver W Pkwy, Golden, CO 80401 USA
来源
RESOURCES CONSERVATION & RECYCLING ADVANCES | 2024年 / 21卷
关键词
Circular economy; Lifecycle assessment; Environmental assessment; Data uncertainty; Meso-level circular economy; Macro -level circular economy; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES; INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; MODEL; LCA; PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY; INDICATORS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rcradv.2024.200203
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The lifecycle assessment (LCA) framework is widely applied to comprehensively evaluate and improve the environmental performance of a circular economy (CE). The advances and application of LCA has been primarily restricted to evaluate the environmental performance of the CE at a micro-level, wherein the CE is implemented for a single product system. However, the CE can be operationalized at two broader levels: the meso-level (for eco-industrial parks) and the macro-level (for a city, state, or nation). Six methodological challenges emerge when applying LCA to a meso- or macro-level CE and remain unaddressed in the existing literature. This includes: selecting a relevant system boundary and functional unit, addressing data paucity and uncertainty, accounting for stakeholder behavior, assessing the trade-offs from renewable energy (RE) use, accounting for manufacturing and technology evolution, and quantifying displacement and rebound. This article proposes potential solutions and research priorities to address the above challenges.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 233 条
[101]   Life cycle optimization of automobile replacement: Model and application [J].
Kim, HC ;
Keoleian, GA ;
Grande, DE ;
Bean, JC .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 37 (23) :5407-5413
[102]   Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions [J].
Kirchherr, Julian ;
Reike, Denise ;
Hekkert, Marko .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 127 :221-232
[103]   Future-Proofing Capitalism: The Paradox of the Circular Economy for Plastics [J].
Knappe, Henrike ;
Schmidt, Oscar .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2021, 21 (02) :1-22
[104]   Towards a collaboration framework for circular economy: The role of dynamic capabilities and open innovation [J].
Kohler, Julia ;
Sonnichsen, Sonnich Dahl ;
Beske-Jansen, Philip .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (06) :2700-2713
[105]  
Kravchenko M., 2020, Procedia CIRP, V90, P31, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.PROCIR.2020.02.118
[106]   Privacy-preserving aggregation in life cycle assessment [J].
Kuczenski B. ;
Sahin C. ;
El Abbadi A. .
Environment Systems and Decisions, 2017, 37 (1) :13-21
[107]   Diamond Wire Sawing of Solar Silicon Wafers: A Sustainable Manufacturing Alternative to Loose Abrasive Slurry Sawing [J].
Kumar, Arkadeep ;
Melkote, Shreyes N. .
15TH GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING, 2018, 21 :549-566
[108]   The affecting factors of circular economy information and its impact on corporate economic sustainability-Evidence from China [J].
Kuo, Lopin ;
Chang, Bao-Guang .
SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2021, 27 :986-997
[109]   Modeling the Time-Varying Advantages of a Remanufactured Product: Is "Reman" Better Than "Brand New"? [J].
Kwak, Minjung ;
Kim, Harrison .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2016, 138 (05)
[110]  
Lawrenz S., 2021, 2021 INT S SOFTWARE