Norwegian physical education teachers' assessment after the introduction of a new curriculum-LK20

被引:3
作者
Tremoen, Tora Storesund [1 ]
Lagestad, Pal [1 ]
机构
[1] Nord Univ, Fac Teacher Educ & Art, Dept Phys Educ & Sport Sci, N-7600 Levanger, Norway
关键词
LK20; curriculum; physical education; assessment; teacher;
D O I
10.1080/13573322.2024.2320182
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In 2020, a new curriculum, Kunnskapsloftet 2020 (LK20), was introduced in Norwegian schools. This study investigated how physical education (PE) teachers in upper secondary schools have changed their assessment practice following the introduction of LK20. To achieve this, nine individual in-depth interviews were conducted with PE teachers from six upper secondary schools in Norway. Using NVivo 12, the teachers' experiences were analysed, and corresponding categories of meaning were created. The results indicated that there were changes in their assessment practice after the introduction of LK20. The PE teachers found it more difficult in LK20 to distinguish between grades, and greater room for interpretation was identified. The results also suggested that PE teachers have become more concerned with the pupils' development over time, rather than with achieving a specific, predetermined goal, and that LK20 better facilitates this aim. PE teaching also seemed to be characterised by a greater amount of play after the introduction of LK20, which teachers viewed as being positive for most pupils. Finally, the analysis pointed to a need in the teachers for more professional support outside of their own immediate circle of colleagues. The results are discussed in relation to Fullan (2016) and one of his key phases according to education policy-driven reforms - the implementation phase. Our findings, and those of other research, identify a need for skills development work and/or courses for PE teachers in assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 496
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   'No assessment, no learning' exploring student participation in assessment in Norwegian physical education (PE) [J].
Aarskog, Eirik .
SPORT EDUCATION AND SOCIETY, 2021, 26 (08) :875-888
[2]   'I have my own picture of what the demands are ... ': Grading in Swedish PEH - problems of validity, comparability and fairness [J].
Annerstedt, Claes ;
Larsson, Staffan .
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL EDUCATION REVIEW, 2010, 16 (02) :97-115
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, AIESEP POS STAT PHYS
[4]  
Arnesen T. E., 2013, FOU PRAKSIS, V7, P9
[5]  
Baghurst T, 2014, PHYS EDUC-US, V71, P505
[6]  
Borgen J. S., 2020, ACTA DIDACTICA NORDE, V14, DOI [https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.8099, DOI 10.5617/ADNO.8099]
[7]   Assessment quality and practices in secondary PE in the Netherlands [J].
Borghouts, Lars B. ;
Slingerland, Menno ;
Haerens, Leen .
PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORT PEDAGOGY, 2017, 22 (05) :473-489
[8]   A comparison of high and low performing secondary physical education programs [J].
Castelli, D ;
Rink, J .
JOURNAL OF TEACHING IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION, 2003, 22 (05) :512-532
[9]   Students' Attitudes Toward Assessment in Physical Education [J].
Evangelou, Efstathia ;
Digelidis, Nikolaos ;
Krommidas, Charalampos .
PHYSICAL CULTURE AND SPORT STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2022, 97 (01) :12-20
[10]  
Evensen K., 2020, VURDERING KROPPSOVIN