Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Gastric Cancer Surgery: Short-Term Outcomes-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 25,521 Patients

被引:11
作者
Loureiro, Pedro [1 ,6 ]
Barbosa, Jose Pedro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vale, Joao Francisco [1 ]
Barbosa, Jose [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Med Informat & Decis Hlth, Dept Community Med, Porto, Portugal
[3] Sao Joao Univ Hosp Ctr, Dept Stomatol, Porto, Portugal
[4] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Dept Surg & Physiol, Porto, Portugal
[5] Sao Joao Univ Hosp Ctr, Dept Gen Surg, Porto, Portugal
[6] Alameda Prof Hernani Monteiro, P-4200319 Porto, Portugal
来源
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES | 2023年 / 33卷 / 08期
关键词
gastrectomy; gastric cancer; robotic surgery; laparoscopy; short-term outcomes; SURGICAL PERFORMANCE; RADICAL GASTRECTOMY; DISTAL GASTRECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; DISSECTION; RECURRENCE; INDEX;
D O I
10.1089/lap.2023.0136
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Gastric cancer has the third highest cancer-related mortality worldwide. There is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical technique to perform curative resection surgery.Objective: Compare laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and robotic gastrectomy (RG) regarding short-term outcomes in patients with gastric cancer.Materials and Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched the following topics: "Gastrectomy," "Laparoscopic," and "Robotic Surgical Procedures." The included studies compared short-term outcomes between LG and RG. Individual risk of bias was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) scale.Results: There was no significant difference between RG and LG regarding conversion rate, reoperation rate, mortality, overall complications, anastomotic leakage, distal and proximal resection margin distances, and recurrence rate. However, mean blood loss (mean difference [MD] -19.43 mL, P < .00001), length of hospital stay (MD -0.50 days, P = .0007), time to first flatus (MD -0.52 days, P < .00001), time to oral intake (MD -0.17 days, P = .0001), surgical complications with a Clavien-Dindo grade >= III (risk ratio [RR] 0.68, P < .0001), and pancreatic complications (RR 0.51, P = .007) were significantly lower in the RG group. Furthermore, the number of retrieved lymph nodes was significantly higher in the RG group. Nevertheless, the RG group showed a significantly higher operation time (MD 41.19 minutes, P < .00001) and cost (MD 3684.27 U.S. Dollars, P < .00001).Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports the choice of robotic surgery over laparoscopy concerning relevant surgical complications. However, longer operation time and higher cost remain crucial limitations. Randomized clinical trials are required to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of RG.
引用
收藏
页码:782 / 800
页数:19
相关论文
共 78 条
[11]   Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: The largest meta-analysis [J].
Guerrini, Gian Piero ;
Esposito, Giuseppe ;
Magistri, Paolo ;
Serra, Valentina ;
Guidetti, Cristiano ;
Olivieri, Tiziana ;
Catellani, Barbara ;
Assirati, Giacomo ;
Ballarin, Roberto ;
Di Sandro, Stefano ;
Di Benedetto, Fabrizio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 82 :210-228
[12]   Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopy-Assisted Pylorus-Preserving Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis [J].
Han, Dong-Seok ;
Suh, Yun-Suhk ;
Ahn, Hye Seong ;
Kong, Seong-Ho ;
Lee, Hyuk-Joon ;
Kim, Woo-Ho ;
Yang, Han-Kwang .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (07) :2323-2328
[13]   Comparisons of surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy in patients with clinical stage I/IIA gastric cancer [J].
Hikage, Makoto ;
Fujiya, Keiichi ;
Kamiya, Satoshi ;
Tanizawa, Yutaka ;
Bando, Etsuro ;
Terashima, Masanori .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (07) :5257-5266
[14]  
Hong SS, 2016, J GASTRIC CANCER, V16, P240
[15]  
Hozo S., 2005, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V5, P13, DOI [DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-5-13, 10/dt5pn6]
[16]  
Hu Li-Dong, 2016, Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, V17, P4327
[17]   Comparison of the Operative Outcomes and Learning Curves between Laparoscopic and Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer [J].
Huang, Kuo-Hung ;
Lan, Yuan-Tzu ;
Fang, Wen-Liang ;
Chen, Jen-Hao ;
Lo, Su-Shun ;
Li, Anna Fen-Yau ;
Chiou, Shih-Hwa ;
Wu, Chew-Wun ;
Shyr, Yi-Ming .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10)
[18]   Robot Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Cancer by an Experienced Surgeon: Comparisons of Surgery, Complications, and Surgical Stress [J].
Hyun, Myung-Han ;
Lee, Chung-Ho ;
Kwon, Ye-Ji ;
Cho, Sung-Il ;
Jang, You-Jin ;
Kim, Dong-Hoon ;
Kim, Jong-Han ;
Park, Seong-Heum ;
Mok, Young-Jae ;
Park, Sung-Soo .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (04) :1258-1265
[19]   Robotic versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis [J].
Isobe, Taro ;
Murakami, Naotaka ;
Minami, Taizan ;
Tanaka, Yuya ;
Kaku, Hideaki ;
Umetani, Yuki ;
Kizaki, Junya ;
Aoyagi, Keishiro ;
Fujita, Fumihiko ;
Akagi, Yoshito .
BMC SURGERY, 2021, 21 (01)
[20]   Effectiveness and safety of robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of 12,401 gastric cancer patients [J].
Jin, Tao ;
Liu, Han-Dong ;
Yang, Kun ;
Chen, Ze-Hua ;
Zhang, Yue-Xin ;
Hu, Jian-Kun .
UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2022, 74 (01) :267-281