Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Gastric Cancer Surgery: Short-Term Outcomes-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 25,521 Patients

被引:11
作者
Loureiro, Pedro [1 ,6 ]
Barbosa, Jose Pedro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vale, Joao Francisco [1 ]
Barbosa, Jose [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Med Informat & Decis Hlth, Dept Community Med, Porto, Portugal
[3] Sao Joao Univ Hosp Ctr, Dept Stomatol, Porto, Portugal
[4] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Dept Surg & Physiol, Porto, Portugal
[5] Sao Joao Univ Hosp Ctr, Dept Gen Surg, Porto, Portugal
[6] Alameda Prof Hernani Monteiro, P-4200319 Porto, Portugal
来源
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES | 2023年 / 33卷 / 08期
关键词
gastrectomy; gastric cancer; robotic surgery; laparoscopy; short-term outcomes; SURGICAL PERFORMANCE; RADICAL GASTRECTOMY; DISTAL GASTRECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; DISSECTION; RECURRENCE; INDEX;
D O I
10.1089/lap.2023.0136
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Gastric cancer has the third highest cancer-related mortality worldwide. There is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical technique to perform curative resection surgery.Objective: Compare laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and robotic gastrectomy (RG) regarding short-term outcomes in patients with gastric cancer.Materials and Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched the following topics: "Gastrectomy," "Laparoscopic," and "Robotic Surgical Procedures." The included studies compared short-term outcomes between LG and RG. Individual risk of bias was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) scale.Results: There was no significant difference between RG and LG regarding conversion rate, reoperation rate, mortality, overall complications, anastomotic leakage, distal and proximal resection margin distances, and recurrence rate. However, mean blood loss (mean difference [MD] -19.43 mL, P < .00001), length of hospital stay (MD -0.50 days, P = .0007), time to first flatus (MD -0.52 days, P < .00001), time to oral intake (MD -0.17 days, P = .0001), surgical complications with a Clavien-Dindo grade >= III (risk ratio [RR] 0.68, P < .0001), and pancreatic complications (RR 0.51, P = .007) were significantly lower in the RG group. Furthermore, the number of retrieved lymph nodes was significantly higher in the RG group. Nevertheless, the RG group showed a significantly higher operation time (MD 41.19 minutes, P < .00001) and cost (MD 3684.27 U.S. Dollars, P < .00001).Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports the choice of robotic surgery over laparoscopy concerning relevant surgical complications. However, longer operation time and higher cost remain crucial limitations. Randomized clinical trials are required to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of RG.
引用
收藏
页码:782 / 800
页数:19
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Totally minimally invasive radical gastrectomy with the da Vinci Xi(R)robotic system versus straight laparoscopy for gastric adenocarcinoma [J].
Aktas, Aydin ;
Aytac, Erman ;
Bas, Mustafa ;
Gunes, Orgun ;
Tarcan, Serim Hande ;
Esen, Eren ;
Gokler, Cihan ;
Aghayeva, Afag ;
Uylas, Ufuk ;
Ozben, Volkan ;
Zengin, Akile ;
Sumer, Fatih ;
Baca, Bilgi ;
Hamzaoglu, Ismail ;
Kayaalp, Cuneyt ;
Karahasanoglu, Tayfun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2020, 16 (06) :1-9
[2]   Lower rate of conversion using robotic-assisted surgery compared to laparoscopy in completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer [J].
Alhossaini, Rana M. ;
Altamran, Abdulaziz A. ;
Cho, Minah ;
Roh, Chul Kyu ;
Seo, Won Jun ;
Choi, Seohee ;
Son, Taeil ;
Kim, Hyoung-Il ;
Hyung, Woo Jin .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (02) :847-852
[3]   The changing face of gastric cancer: epidemiologic trends and advances in novel therapies [J].
Chandra, Raghav ;
Balachandar, Neeraja ;
Wang, Sam ;
Reznik, Scott ;
Zeh, Herbert ;
Porembka, Matthew .
CANCER GENE THERAPY, 2021, 28 (05) :390-399
[4]   Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative mono-institutional study [J].
Cianchi, Fabio ;
Indennitate, Giampiero ;
Trallori, Giacomo ;
Ortolani, Manuela ;
Paoli, Beatrice ;
Macri, Giuseppe ;
Lami, Gabriele ;
Mallardi, Beatrice ;
Badii, Benedetta ;
Staderini, Fabio ;
Qirici, Etleva ;
Taddei, Antonio ;
Ringressi, Maria Novella ;
Messerini, Luca ;
Novelli, Luca ;
Bagnoli, Siro ;
Bonanomi, Andrea ;
Foppa, Caterina ;
Skalamera, Ileana ;
Fiorenza, Giulia ;
Perigli, Giuliano .
BMC SURGERY, 2016, 16
[5]   Patterns of initial recurrence in completely resected gastric adenocarcinoma [J].
D'Angelica, M ;
Gonen, M ;
Brennan, MF ;
Turnbull, AD ;
Bains, M ;
Karpeh, MS .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (05) :808-816
[6]   Comparison of surgical performance and short-term clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic surgery in distal gastric cancer [J].
Eom, B. W. ;
Yoon, H. M. ;
Ryu, K. W. ;
Lee, J. H. ;
Cho, S. J. ;
Lee, J. Y. ;
Kim, C. G. ;
Choi, I. J. ;
Lee, J. S. ;
Kook, M. C. ;
Rhee, J. Y. ;
Park, S. R. ;
Kim, Y. W. .
EJSO, 2012, 38 (01) :57-63
[7]  
Ferlay J, 2010, BREAST CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-0685-4_1
[8]   Surgical and oncological outcomes of robotic- versus laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of 1164 patients [J].
Gao, Gengmei ;
Liao, Hualin ;
Jiang, Qunguang ;
Liu, Dongning ;
Li, Taiyuan .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 20 (01)
[9]   Comparison of robotic- and laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer: updated short- and long-term results [J].
Gao, Yunhe ;
Xi, Hongqing ;
Qiao, Zhi ;
Li, Jiyang ;
Zhang, Kecheng ;
Xie, Tianyu ;
Shen, Weisong ;
Cui, Jianxin ;
Wei, Bo ;
Chen, Lin .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (02) :528-534
[10]   Clinical efficacy and safety of robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Gong, Shiyi ;
Li, Xiong ;
Tian, Hongwei ;
Song, Shaoming ;
Lu, Tingting ;
Jing, Wutang ;
Huang, Xianbin ;
Xu, Yongcheng ;
Wang, Xingqiang ;
Zhao, Kaixuan ;
Yang, Kehu ;
Guo, Tiankang .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (05) :2734-2748