Enhancing Soft Tissue Differentiation with Different Dual-Energy CT Systems: A Phantom Study

被引:1
|
作者
Gallo, Pasqualina [1 ,2 ]
D'Alessio, Andrea [3 ]
Pascuzzo, Riccardo [2 ]
Gallo, Salvatore [4 ,7 ]
Fumagalli, Maria Luisa [2 ]
Ortenzia, Ornella [5 ]
Tenconi, Chiara [6 ]
Cavatorta, Claudia [6 ]
Pignoli, Emanuele [4 ,6 ]
Ghetti, Caterina [5 ]
Bruzzone, Maria Grazia [2 ]
De Martin, Elena [2 ]
机构
[1] Human Res Ctr IRCCS, Dept Radiotherapy & Radiosurg, Via G Manzoni 56, I-20089 Milan, Italy
[2] Fdn IRCCS Ist Neurol Carlo Besta, Via G Celoria 11, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Hosp Maggiore Carita, Med Phys Dept, Corso G Mazzini 18, I-28100 Novara, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Phys Dept Aldo Pontremoli, Via G Celoria 16, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Hosp Parma, Med Phys Dept, Via A Gramsci 14, I-43126 Parma, Italy
[6] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori, Med Phys Dept, Via G Venezian 1, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[7] Univ Catania, Phys & Astron Dept Ettore Majorana, Via S Sofia64, I-95125 Catania, Italy
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 05期
关键词
dual-energy CT; soft tissue; SNR; virtual monochromatic imaging; IMAGE-QUALITY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; SPECTRAL CT; HEAD; QUANTIFICATION; PRINCIPLES; ACCURACY; IODINE; NECK;
D O I
10.3390/app14051724
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
To quantitatively evaluate the possible advantages of quantifying and differentiating various soft tissues using virtual monochromatic images (VMI) derived from different dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) technologies. This study involved four DECT scanners with different technologies. CIRS phantom images were acquired in single-energy (SECT) and DECT modes with each scanner. The analysis focused on five equivalent soft-tissue inserts: adipose, breast, liver, muscle, and bone (200 mg). The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated for each equivalent soft-tissue insert. Finally, the contrasts of tissue pairs between DECT and SECT images were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests adjusted for multiple comparisons. Average CT numbers and noise showed a significant difference pattern between DECT with respect to SECT for each CT scanner. Generally, energy levels of 70 keV or higher led to improved SNR in VMI for most of the equivalent soft-tissue inserts. However, energy levels of 40-50 keV showed significantly higher contrasts in most of the equivalent soft-tissue insert pairs. DECT images at low energies, especially at 40-50 keV, outperform SECT images in discriminating soft tissues across all four DECT technologies. The combined use of DECT images reconstructed at different energy levels provides a more comprehensive set of information for diagnostic and/or radiotherapy evaluation compared to SECT. Some differences between scanners are evident, depending on the DECT acquisition technique and reconstruction method.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dual-energy CT: a phantom comparison of different platforms for abdominal imaging
    Sellerer, Thorsten
    Noel, Peter B.
    Patino, Manuel
    Parakh, Anushri
    Ehn, Sebastian
    Zeiter, Sascha
    Holz, Jasmin A.
    Hammel, Johannes
    Fingerle, Alexander A.
    Pfeiffer, Franz
    Maintz, David
    Rummeny, Ernst J.
    Muenzel, Daniela
    Sahani, Dushyant V.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (07) : 2745 - 2755
  • [2] Accuracy of Dual-Energy CT Virtual Unenhanced and Material-Specific Images: A Phantom Study
    Li, Baojun
    Pomerleau, Mark
    Gupta, Avneesh
    Soto, Jorge A.
    Anderson, Stephan W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 215 (05) : 1146 - 1154
  • [3] Investigating new CT contrast agents: a phantom study exploring quantification and differentiation methods for high-Z elements using dual-energy CT
    Soesbe, Todd C.
    Xi, Yin
    Nasr, Khaled
    Leyendecker, John R.
    Lenkinski, Robert E.
    Lewis, Matthew A.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (10) : 8060 - 8067
  • [4] Dual-energy CT of the abdomen
    Morgan, Desiree E.
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2014, 39 (01): : 108 - 134
  • [5] Dual-energy CT evaluation of gastrointestinal bleeding
    Trabzonlu, Tugce Agirlar
    Mozaffary, Amirhossein
    Kim, Donald
    Yaghmai, Vahid
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [6] Bowel Peristalsis Artifact on Dual-Energy CT: In Vitro Study on the Influence of Different Dual-Energy CT Platforms and Enteric Contrast Agents
    Obmann, Markus M.
    Sun, Yuxin
    An, Chansik
    Ohliger, Michael A.
    Wang, Zhen J.
    Yeh, Benjamin M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 218 (02) : 290 - 299
  • [7] Dual-energy CT: a phantom comparison of different platforms for abdominal imaging
    Thorsten Sellerer
    Peter B. Noël
    Manuel Patino
    Anushri Parakh
    Sebastian Ehn
    Sascha Zeiter
    Jasmin A. Holz
    Johannes Hammel
    Alexander A. Fingerle
    Franz Pfeiffer
    David Maintz
    Ernst J. Rummeny
    Daniela Muenzel
    Dushyant V. Sahani
    European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 2745 - 2755
  • [8] Calcium scoring with dual-energy CT in men and women: an anthropomorphic phantom study
    Li, Qin
    Liu, Songtao
    Myers, Kyle
    Gavrielides, Marios A.
    Zeng, Rongping
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Petrick, Nicholas
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2016: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2016, 9783
  • [9] Pseudoenhancement effects on iodine quantification from dual-energy spectral CT systems: A multi-vendor phantom study regarding renal lesion characterization
    Soesbe, Todd C.
    Ananthakrishnan, Lakshmi
    Lewis, Matthew A.
    Duan, Xinhui
    Nasr, Khaled
    Xi, Yin
    Abbara, Suhny
    Leyendecker, John R.
    Lenkinski, Robert E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 105 : 125 - 133
  • [10] Accuracy of iodine quantification in dual energy CT: A phantom study across 3 different CT systems
    Dehlinger, N.
    Bach, J.
    Willaume, T.
    Ohana, M.
    Dillenseger, J. P.
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2024, 30 (01) : 226 - 230