GROUNDWATER LEVEL PREDICTION USING DEEP RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORKS AND UNCERTAINTY ASSESSMENT

被引:1
|
作者
Eghrari, Z. [1 ]
Delavar, M. R. [2 ]
Zare, M. [3 ]
Mousavi, M. [1 ]
Nazari, B. [4 ]
Ghaffarian, S. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Sch Surveying & Geospatial Engn, Coll Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Sch Surveying & Geospatial Eng, Coll Engn, Ctr Excellence Geomat Eng Disaster Management & L, Tehran, Iran
[3] Int Inst Earthquake Engn & Seismol, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran, Sch Surveying & Geospatial Engn, GIS Dept, Coll Engn, Tehran, Iran
[5] UCL, Inst Risk & Disaster Reduct, London, England
来源
GEOSPATIAL WEEK 2023, VOL. 10-1 | 2023年
关键词
Groundwater Level; Climate Change; GIS; Deep Learning; LSTM; Uncertainty; MODELS; RMSE;
D O I
10.5194/isprs-annals-X-1-W1-2023-493-2023
中图分类号
K85 [文物考古];
学科分类号
0601 ;
摘要
Groundwater is one of the most important sources of regional water supply for humans. In recent years, several factors have contributed to a significant decline in groundwater levels (GWL) in certain regions. As a result of climate change, such as temperature increase, rainfall decrease, and changes in relative humidity, it is necessary to investigate and model the effects of these factors on GWL. Although a number of researches have been conducted on GWL modeling with machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms, only a limited number of studies have reported model uncertainty. In this paper, GWL modeling of some piezometric wells has been conducted by considering the effects of the meteorological parameters with Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) algorithms. The models were trained on one piezometric well data and predictions were executed on six other wells. To perform an uncertainty assessment, the models were run 10 times and their means were calculated. Subsequently, their standard deviations were considered to evaluate the outcomes. In addition, the prediction power of the models was validated using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE), and R-Squared (R-2). Finally, for all the six wells that did not participate in the training phase, the prediction functions of the trained models were run 10 times and their accuracy was assessed. The results indicate that LSTM (R-2=95.6895, RMSE=0.4744 m, NRMSE=0.0558, MAE=0.3383 m) had a better performance compared to that of GRU (R-2=95.2433, RMSE=0.4984 m, NRMSE=0.0586, MAE=0.3658 m) on the GWL modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 500
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Application of Deep Recurrent Neural Networks for Prediction of User Behavior in Tor Networks
    Ishitaki, Taro
    Obukata, Ryoichiro
    Oda, Tetsuya
    Barolli, Leonard
    2017 31ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INFORMATION NETWORKING AND APPLICATIONS WORKSHOPS (IEEE WAINA 2017), 2017, : 238 - 243
  • [22] Volatility forecasting using deep recurrent neural networks as GARCH models
    Di-Giorgi, Gustavo
    Salas, Rodrigo
    Avaria, Rodrigo
    Ubal, Cristian
    Rosas, Harvey
    Torres, Romina
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2023,
  • [23] Deep Recurrent Neural Networks in Speech Synthesis Using a Continuous Vocoder
    Al-Radhi, Mohammed Salah
    Csapo, Tamas Gabor
    Nemeth, Geza
    SPEECH AND COMPUTER, SPECOM 2017, 2017, 10458 : 282 - 291
  • [24] Accurate Trajectory Prediction in a Smart Building using Recurrent Neural Networks
    Das, Anooshmita
    Kolvig-Raun, Emil Stubbe
    Kjaergaard, Mikkel Baun
    UBICOMP/ISWC '20 ADJUNCT: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 ACM INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE AND UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 ACM INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON WEARABLE COMPUTERS, 2020, : 619 - 628
  • [25] Cellular Traffic Prediction using Recurrent Neural Networks
    Jaffry, Shan
    Hasan, Syed Faraz
    2020 IEEE 5TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TELECOMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (ISTT), 2020, : 94 - 98
  • [26] Fuzzy prediction architecture using recurrent neural networks
    Graves, Daniel
    Pedrycz, Witold
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2009, 72 (7-9) : 1668 - 1678
  • [27] Prediction of Road Traffic Flow Based on Deep Recurrent Neural Networks
    Bartlett, Zoe
    Han, Liangxiu
    Trung Thanh Nguyen
    Johnson, Princy
    2019 IEEE SMARTWORLD, UBIQUITOUS INTELLIGENCE & COMPUTING, ADVANCED & TRUSTED COMPUTING, SCALABLE COMPUTING & COMMUNICATIONS, CLOUD & BIG DATA COMPUTING, INTERNET OF PEOPLE AND SMART CITY INNOVATION (SMARTWORLD/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCOM/IOP/SCI 2019), 2019, : 102 - 109
  • [28] Deep Recurrent Neural Networks for Building-Level Load Forecasting
    Linaro, Daniele
    del Giudice, Davide
    Bizzarri, Federico
    Brambilla, Angelo
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (ISCAS 22), 2022, : 118 - 122
  • [30] RATE OF PENETRATION PREDICTION USING QUANTILE REGRESSION DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS
    Ambrus, Adrian
    Alyaev, Sergey
    Jahani, Nazanin
    Pacis, Felix James
    Wiktorski, Tomasz
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 41ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE & ARCTIC ENGINEERING, OMAE2022, VOL 10, 2022,