Methodology for soft-sensor design and in-process surface conditioning in turning of aluminum alloys

被引:0
作者
Junge, Thomas [1 ]
Mehner, Thomas [2 ]
Nestler, Andreas [1 ]
Lampke, Thomas [2 ]
Schubert, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Chemnitz, Micromfg Technol, Reichenhainer Str 70, D-09126 Chemnitz, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Chemnitz, Mat & Surface Engn, Erfenschlager Str 73, D-09125 Chemnitz, Germany
来源
PRODUCTION ENGINEERING-RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 2024年 / 18卷 / 02期
关键词
Aluminum alloys; In-process monitoring; Soft sensor; Surface conditioning; Turning; RESIDUAL-STRESS; INTEGRITY; ROUGHNESS;
D O I
10.1007/s11740-023-01260-0
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Surface properties significantly influence the performance of machined parts. However, they cannot be measured directly during machining. For surface conditioning based on a soft sensor, it is necessary to monitor process characteristics like temperatures and forces, which influence the surface state. Soft-sensor development in machining requires a robust methodology, which is adaptable to different materials and machining processes. In addition, a measurement system that combines hardware sensors to measure temperatures and process forces has to be implemented into the machine tool. In the present study, a suitable methodology is proposed and tested using a tool-workpiece thermocouple and a dynamometer to determine the thermomechanical workpiece load during turning of the aluminum alloys EN AW-2017 and EN AW-7075. Experimental investigations are performed according to a D-optimal statistical design of experiments. For this, the machining parameters cutting speed, feed, depth of cut, as well as the flank wear land width are varied on four levels. Subsequent measurements of residual stresses and the surface roughness are used to correlate the surface state with input parameters and their resulting thermomechanical workpiece load by multiple regression based on analysis of variance (ANOVA). It is found that the methodology is applicable and allows for the prediction of surface states. The developed soft sensors enable an in-process control of machining parameters, which enables a robust prediction and targeted conditioning of the addressed surface properties during machining.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 287
页数:21
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] ATTIA MH, 1993, J ENG IND-T ASME, V115, P444, DOI 10.1115/1.2901788
  • [2] Process Signatures - a new approach to solve the inverse surface integrity problem in machining processes
    Brinksmeier, Ekkard
    Klocke, Fritz
    Lucca, Don A.
    Soelter, Jens
    Meyer, Daniel
    [J]. 2ND CIRP CONFERENCE ON SURFACE INTEGRITY (CSI), 2014, 13 : 429 - 434
  • [3] X-ray investigation of stress states in materials .3.
    Eigenmann, B
    Macherauch, E
    [J]. MATERIALWISSENSCHAFT UND WERKSTOFFTECHNIK, 1996, 27 (09) : 426 - 437
  • [4] El-Axir MH, 2017, ENG TECHNOL APPL SCI, V7, P2047
  • [5] Analysis of the evolution of the Built-Up Edge and Built-Up Layer formation mechanisms in the dry turning of aeronautical aluminium alloys
    Gomez-Parra, A.
    Alvarez-Alcon, M.
    Salguero, J.
    Batista, M.
    Marcos, M.
    [J]. WEAR, 2013, 302 (1-2) : 1209 - 1218
  • [6] Low and High Speed Orthogonal Cutting of AA6061-T6 under Dry and Flood-Coolant Modes: Tool Wear and Residual Stress Measurements and Predictions
    Javidikia, Mahshad
    Sadeghifar, Morteza
    Songmene, Victor
    Jahazi, Mohammad
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (15)
  • [7] Effect of turning environments and parameters on surface integrity of AA6061-T6: experimental analysis, predictive modeling, and multi-criteria optimization
    Javidikia, Mahshad
    Sadeghifar, Morteza
    Songmene, Victor
    Jahazi, Mohammad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 110 (9-10) : 2669 - 2683
  • [8] Surface integrity in material removal processes: Recent advances
    Jawahir, I. S.
    Brinksmeier, E.
    M'Saoubi, R.
    Aspinwall, D. K.
    Outeiro, J. C.
    Meyer, D.
    Umbrello, D.
    Jayal, A. D.
    [J]. CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 60 (02) : 603 - 626
  • [9] Junge Thomas, 2023, Procedia CIRP, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2023.03.017
  • [10] Junge Thomas, 2022, Procedia CIRP, P246, DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2022.03.043