Energy consumption within policy uncertainty: Considering the climate and economic factors

被引:90
作者
Li, Zheng Zheng [1 ]
Su, Chi-Wei [1 ]
Moldovan, Nicoleta-Claudia [2 ]
Umar, Muhammad [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Sch Econ, 62 Kedazhi Rd, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] West Univ Timisoara, Finance Dept, Timisoara, Romania
[3] Lebanese Amer Univ, Adnan Kassar Sch Business, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
Renewable energy; Non-renewable energy; Climate policy uncertainty; Economic policy uncertainty; Rolling window causality test; RENEWABLE ENERGY; FINANCIAL CRISIS; IMPACT; GROWTH; INVESTMENT; PARAMETER; MARKET; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2023.03.098
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Climate and economic policy are closely correlated with energy consumption. This study investigates the bidirectional causality between renewable (REC) and non-renewable energy consumption (NEC) and policy uncertainties. The time-varying bootstrap rolling window causality test considers structural changes and parameter instability. The results show that the causality between REC and climate policy uncertainty (CPU) is both negative and positive, which mainly stems from the attitudes of authorities towards climate change. If the Administration is positive for climate change mitigation, the correlation between REC and CPU is positive; otherwise, it is negative. The nexus between NEC and CPU is mainly positive, except during global financial crisis periods. This reflects that climate policies are affected by financial crises due to financial constraints. For comparison, we further analyse the dynamic correlation between energy consumption and economic policy uncertainty (EPU). EPU has a significant negative impact on REC in most subperiods, while it has a positive impact on NEC. This can be explained by the fact that non-renewable energy is cheap and convenient to use during economic downturns. Moreover, crude oil has strategic reserve value, especially in the turmoil periods. Regarding policy implications, harmonious and coherent climate and economic policies are important for energy transition.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 576
页数:10
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Economic uncertainty and the influence of monetary policy [J].
Aastveit, Knut Are ;
Natvik, Gisle James ;
Sola, Sergio .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2017, 76 :50-67
[2]   An investigation into the anthropogenic nexus among consumption of energy, tourism, and economic growth: do economic policy uncertainties matter? [J].
Adedoyin, Festus Fatai ;
Nathaniel, Solomon ;
Adeleye, Ngozi .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (03) :2835-2847
[3]   Energy consumption, economic expansion, and CO2 emission in the UK: The role of economic policy uncertainty [J].
Adedoyin, Festus Fatai ;
Zakari, Abdulrasheed .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 738
[4]   Use of economic instruments in the German renewable electricity policy [J].
Agnolucci, Paolo .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (18) :3538-3548
[5]   Geopolitical risk, uncertainty and Bitcoin investment [J].
Al Mamun, Md ;
Uddin, Gazi Salah ;
Suleman, Muhammad Tahir ;
Kang, Sang Hoon .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2020, 540 (540)
[6]   OPTIMAL TESTS WHEN A NUISANCE PARAMETER IS PRESENT ONLY UNDER THE ALTERNATIVE [J].
ANDREWS, DWK ;
PLOBERGER, W .
ECONOMETRICA, 1994, 62 (06) :1383-1414
[7]   Economic growth and energy consumption causal nexus viewed through a bootstrap rolling window [J].
Balcilar, Mehmet ;
Ozdemir, Zeynel Abidin ;
Arslanturk, Yalcin .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2010, 32 (06) :1398-1410
[8]   IRREVERSIBILITY, UNCERTAINTY, AND CYCLICAL INVESTMENT [J].
BERNANKE, BS .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1983, 98 (01) :85-106
[9]   The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: A revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach [J].
Bilgili, Faik ;
Kocak, Emrah ;
Bulut, Umit .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 54 :838-845
[10]   National energy security assessment in a geopolitical perspective [J].
Bompard, E. ;
Carpignano, A. ;
Erriquez, M. ;
Grosso, D. ;
Pession, M. ;
Profumo, F. .
ENERGY, 2017, 130 :144-154