Rethinking aversive personality: Decomposing the Dark Triad traits into their common core and unique flavors

被引:26
作者
Bader, Martina [1 ]
Hilbig, Benjamin E. [2 ]
Zettler, Ingo [3 ,4 ]
Moshagen, Morten [1 ]
机构
[1] Ulm Univ, Inst Psychol & Educ, Albert Einstein Allee 47, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
[2] Univ Koblenz Landau, Cognit Psychol, Landau, Germany
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Psychol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Copenhagen Ctr Social Data Sci SODAS, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Dark Factor of Personality; Dark Triad of Personality; Machiavellianism; narcissism; psychopathy; PSYCHOPATHIC PERSONALITY; NARCISSISTIC ADMIRATION; NOMOLOGICAL NETWORK; MACHIAVELLIANISM; BEHAVIOR; SCALE; METAANALYSIS; AGGRESSION; VALIDATION; INVENTORY;
D O I
10.1111/jopy.12785
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective To explain and predict unethical behavior, much attention has been devoted to the "Dark Triad of Personality", a set of three socially aversive personality traits: Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy. Despite its popularity, research on the Dark Triad has been beset by recurring concerns surrounding the distinctiveness of its components. Herein, we propose an alternative theoretical view that conceptualizes the Dark Triad traits as specific manifestations of the common core of aversive traits (conceptualized as the Dark Factor of Personality, D) flavored by unique, essentially non-aversive characteristics. Method In two studies (total N > 1000), we test this idea by examining the conceptual and empirical overlap and specificity of the Dark Triad traits vis-a-vis D and each other. Results Findings support the conceptualization of the Dark Triad traits as flavored manifestations of D and also reveal a marked discrepancy between the current conceptualization of the Dark Triad traits and the empirical structure of its subdimensions. In fact, evidence clearly failed to support the existence of a triad of traits. Conclusion Conceptualizing single aversive traits as a conjunction of core D aspects and essentially non-aversive characteristics (admiration; disinhibition vs. planfulness; vulnerability vs. boldness) holds promise to move the field forward.
引用
收藏
页码:1084 / 1109
页数:26
相关论文
共 97 条
[91]   Differences Among Dark Triad Components: A Meta-Analytic Investigation [J].
Vize, Colin E. ;
Lynam, Donald R. ;
Collison, Katherine L. ;
Miller, Joshua D. .
PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 9 (02) :101-111
[92]   Illuminating the 'dark core': Mapping global versus specific sources of variance across multiple measures of the dark triad [J].
Volmer, Judith ;
Koch, Iris K. ;
Wolff, Christian .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2019, 145 :97-102
[93]   The Nature and Correlates of the Dark Triad: The Answers Depend on the Questions [J].
Watts, Ashley L. ;
Waldman, Irwin D. ;
Smith, Sarah Francis ;
Poore, Holly E. ;
Lilienfeld, Scott O. .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 126 (07) :951-968
[94]   The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity [J].
Whiteside, SP ;
Lynam, DR .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2001, 30 (04) :669-689
[95]  
WINCH RF, 1965, SOC FORCES, V44, P255
[96]   Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data [J].
Yuan, KH ;
Bentler, PM .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY 2000, VOL 30, 2000, 30 :165-200
[97]   Stability and Change: The Dark Factor of Personality Shapes Dark Traits [J].
Zettler, Ingo ;
Moshagen, Morten ;
Hilbig, Benjamin E. .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2021, 12 (06) :974-983