Improving Engagement and Retention to Treatment Within VHA PTSD Specialty Care: Evolution of an Outpatient Program Design BRIEF REPORT

被引:2
作者
Hessinger, Jonathan D. [1 ]
Etingen, Bella [2 ]
Larsen, Sadie E. [3 ,4 ]
Hunley, Holly A. [5 ]
Goldstein, Daniel A. [1 ]
Day, Anne M. [1 ]
Mayberry, Megan [1 ]
Weber, Dana J. [1 ]
Dolgin, Ron [1 ]
Beyer, Jonathan A. [1 ]
Maieritsch, Kelly P. [6 ]
机构
[1] Edward Hines Jr VA Hosp, Trauma Serv Program, Mental Hlth Serv Line 116B, Hines, IL 60141 USA
[2] Edward Hines Jr VA Hosp, Ctr Innovat Complex Chron Healthcare, Hines, IL USA
[3] Milwaukee VA Med Ctr, Milwaukee, WI USA
[4] Med Coll Wisconsin, Behav Hlth Tosa Hlth Ctr, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[5] WG Bill Hefner VA Med Ctr, VISN 6 TMH Hub & Suicide Prevent Telehlth Program, Salisbury, NC USA
[6] VA Med Ctr, Natl Ctr PTSD, White River Jct, VT USA
关键词
program evaluation; posttraumatic stress disorder; shared decision-making; VA health care; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; VETERANS;
D O I
10.1037/ser0000705
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Veteran's Health Administration (VA) and Department of Defense (DoD) posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) clinical practice guidelines (2017) recommend individual, trauma-focused therapy as the gold standard of treatment for PTSD (i.e., evidence-based practices [EBP]). Moreover, these guidelines encourage the use of individual shared decision-making (SDM) to increase engagement and completion of EBPs for PTSD in line with current literature. This study retrospectively evaluated three models of program design of a VA PTSD specialty clinic over the past 8 years. In line with previous literature, the study hypothesized that leveraging individualized SDM in the clinic design would lead to increased completion of EBPs for PTSD. Analyses indicated an impact as the models shifted from a group-based model to an individualized model. Specifically, as compared to veterans who completed a group-based design, a greater proportion of those enrolled in the clinic were more likely to complete an EBP. These results may suggest that individualized, patient-centered treatment planning may be related to patient engagement in EBPs for PTSD in contrast with group-based models. Other programmatic changes, such as changes in treatment options presented to patients, a movement to focus on EBPs for PTSD, and expanded clinic hours and telehealth options, possibly impacted veteran engagement and completion in EBPs. The study highlights the potential impacts of a changing patient population within the clinic over a relatively short period. The observations are discussed, and limitations are highlighted. The study shares the hope for additional randomized prospective studies of program designs. Impact Statement This study examines the evolution of an outpatient VA PTSD clinical team as practices moved from group-based model to a more individualized, veteran-centric model. This study underscores the positive impact of a programmatic shift toward individualized care that occurred in concurrence with additional demographic shifts in the veteran clinical population, and availability of remote care options delivered via telehealth. Further clinical research is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 247
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Exploring the decision-making preferences of people with colorectal cancer
    Beaver, K
    Jones, D
    Susnerwala, S
    Craven, O
    Tomlinson, M
    Witham, G
    Luker, KA
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2005, 8 (02) : 103 - 113
  • [2] Risk Factors for Apnea in Pediatric Patients Transported by Paramedics for Out-of-Hospital Seizure
    Bosson, Nichole
    Santillanes, Genevieve
    Kaji, Amy H.
    Fang, Andrea
    Fernando, Tasha
    Huang, Margaret
    Lee, Jumie
    Gausche-Hill, Marianne
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 63 (03) : 302 - 308
  • [3] Provider Perspectives on Implementing Shared Decision Making for PTSD Treatment in VA Primary Care
    Chen, Jessica A.
    Matson, Theresa E.
    Lehavot, Keren
    Raue, Patrick J.
    Young, Jessica P.
    Silvestrini, Molly C.
    Fortney, John C.
    Williams, Emily C.
    [J]. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 48 (06) : 1046 - 1054
  • [4] Cheng H.M., 2020, INT J STUDIES NURSIN, V5, P41, DOI [10.20849/ijsn.v5i2.751, DOI 10.20849/IJSN.V5I2.751]
  • [5] Effects of a Brief Education and Treatment-Planning Group on Evidence-Based PTSD Treatment Utilization and Completion Among Veterans
    DeViva, Jason C.
    Bassett, Gwendolyn A.
    Santoro, Gia M.
    Fenton, Lisa
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA-THEORY RESEARCH PRACTICE AND POLICY, 2017, 9 : 35 - 41
  • [6] Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Frosch, Dominick
    Thomson, Richard
    Joseph-Williams, Natalie
    Lloyd, Amy
    Kinnersley, Paul
    Cording, Emma
    Tomson, Dave
    Dodd, Carole
    Rollnick, Stephen
    Edwards, Adrian
    Barry, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (10) : 1361 - 1367
  • [7] Training Providers in Shared Decision Making for Trauma Treatment Planning
    Etingen, Bella
    Hessinger, Jonathan D.
    Hunley, Holly A.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, 2022, 19 (01) : 125 - 133
  • [8] VA PTSD Clinic Director Perspectives: How Perceptions of Readiness Influence Delivery of Evidence-Based PTSD Treatment
    Hamblen, Jessica L.
    Bernardy, Nancy C.
    Sherrieb, Kathleen
    Norris, Fran H.
    Cook, Joan M.
    Louis, Claudine A.
    Schnurr, Paula P.
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2015, 46 (02) : 90 - 96
  • [9] Evaluation of a Shared Decision-Making Intervention on the Utilization of Evidence-Based Psychotherapy in a VA Outpatient PTSD Clinic
    Hessinger, Jonathan D.
    London, Melissa J.
    Baer, Sheila M.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, 2018, 15 (04) : 437 - 441
  • [10] Failure to Engage: A Qualitative Study of Veterans Who Decline Evidence-Based Psychotherapies for PTSD
    Hundt, Natalie E.
    Helm, Ashley
    Smith, Tracey L.
    Lamkin, Joanna
    Cully, Jeffrey A.
    Stanley, Melinda A.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, 2018, 15 (04) : 536 - 542