Disparity of agricultural credit in India: field data evidence from farmers across social groups

被引:2
作者
Yadav, Inder Sekhar [1 ]
Rao, M. Sanatan [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Dept Humanities & Social Sci, Kharagpur, W Bengal, India
[2] Utkal Univ, Dept Analyt & Appl Econ, Bhubaneswar, India
关键词
Agricultural credit; Social groups; Disparity; Credit access; Credit access ratio; Agriculture credit disparity index; ACCESS; CASTE; INEQUALITY;
D O I
10.1108/IJSE-03-2022-0189
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose This work aims to examine the access and disparity of institutional agricultural credit for small and marginal farmers across various social groups from three Indian states. Design/methodology/approach Field data on socio economic variables were collected using multi-stage stratified random sampling and purposive sampling through a structured questionnaire by interviewing about 400 cross sectional small and marginal farmers belonging to various social groups such as general caste, other backward caste, scheduled castes and scheduled tribes. Disparity of agricultural credit across different social groups is assessed using measures such as credit access, credit adequacy ratio, credit gap and newly constructed Agriculture Credit Disparity Index (ACDI). Findings The credit access, credit access ratio and newly constructed ACDI suggest that, by and large, farmers belonging to socially advantaged groups have better access to institutional agricultural assistance than farmers belonging to socially disadvantaged groups. Practical implications The agricultural credit policy of the government needs to incorporate measures to eliminate credit disparity primarily by correcting the poor socio-economic profile (especially lower asset ownership and higher illiteracy) of socially disadvantaged farmers compared to the farmers' counterparts. Originality/value This study contributes to the existing work by providing fresh evidence from the field across social groups for both kharif and rabi crops using recent survey data from small and marginal farmers which have important policy implications.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 194
页数:15
相关论文
共 29 条