A survey on uncertainty reasoning and quantification in belief theory and its application to deep learning

被引:11
作者
Guo, Zhen [1 ]
Wan, Zelin [1 ]
Zhang, Qisheng [1 ]
Zhao, Xujiang [6 ]
Zhang, Qi [1 ]
Kaplan, Lance M. [3 ]
Josang, Audun [5 ]
Jeong, Dong H. [4 ]
Chen, Feng [2 ]
Cho, Jin-Hee [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Comp Sci, 7054 Haycock Rd, Falls Church, VA 22043 USA
[2] Univ Texas Dallas, Dept Comp Sci, 800 W Campbell Rd, Richardson, TX 75080 USA
[3] US Army Res Lab, 2800 Powder Mill Rd, Adelphi, MD 20783 USA
[4] Univ Dist Columbia, Dept Comp Sci Informat Technol, 4200 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC 20008 USA
[5] Univ Oslo, Dept Informat, Ole Johan Dahls hus Gaustadalleen,23b, N-0373 Oslo, Norway
[6] NEC Labs Amer Inc, 4 Independence Way,Suite 200, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Belief theory; Uncertainty reasoning; Uncertainty quantification; Decision making; Machine/deep learning; DEMPSTER-SHAFER THEORY; NEURAL-NETWORK; BAYESIAN-INFERENCE; ROUGH SET; FUZZY; MACHINE; COMBINATION; MANAGEMENT; LOGIC; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101987
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
An in-depth understanding of uncertainty is the first step to making effective decisions under uncertainty. Machine/deep learning (ML/DL) has been hugely leveraged to solve complex problems involved with pro-cessing high-dimensional data. However, reasoning and quantifying different uncertainties to achieve effective decision-making have been much less explored in ML/DL than in other Artificial Intelligence (AI) domains. In particular, belief/evidence theories have been studied in Knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) since the 1960s to reason and measure uncertainties to enhance decision-making effectiveness. Based on our in-depth literature review, only a few studies have leveraged mature uncertainty research in belief/evidence theories in ML/DL to tackle complex problems under different types of uncertainty. Our present survey paper discusses major belief theories and their core ideas dealing with uncertainty causes and types and quantifying them, along with the discussions of their applicability in ML/DL. Particularly, we discuss three main approaches leveraging belief theories in Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), including Evidential DNNs, Fuzzy DNNs, and Rough DNNs, in terms of their uncertainty causes, types, and quantification methods along with their applicability in diverse problem domains. Through an in-depth understanding of the extensive survey on this topic, we discuss insights, lessons learned, limitations of the current state-of-the-art bridging belief theories and ML/DL, and future research directions. This paper conducts an extensive survey by bridging belief theories and deep learning in reasoning and quantifying uncertainty to help researchers initiate uncertainty and decision-making research.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 178 条
[1]  
Abbas N., 2015, Adv. Appl. DSmT Inf. Fusion, P359
[2]   A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges [J].
Abdar, Moloud ;
Pourpanah, Farhad ;
Hussain, Sadiq ;
Rezazadegan, Dana ;
Liu, Li ;
Ghavamzadeh, Mohammad ;
Fieguth, Paul ;
Cao, Xiaochun ;
Khosravi, Abbas ;
Acharya, U. Rajendra ;
Makarenkov, Vladimir ;
Nahavandi, Saeid .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2021, 76 :243-297
[3]   Surveillance scene representation and trajectory abnormality detection using aggregation of multiple concepts [J].
Ahmed, Sk. Arif ;
Dogra, Debi Prosad ;
Kar, Samarjit ;
Roy, Partha Pratim .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2018, 101 :43-55
[4]   CSL+: Scalable Collective Subjective Logic under Multidimensional Uncertainty [J].
Alim, Adil ;
Cho, Jin-Hee ;
Chen, Feng .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 12 (01)
[5]  
Alim A, 2019, IEEE INT CONF BIG DA, P6, DOI 10.1109/BigData47090.2019.9006319
[6]  
Amini A., 2020, Advances in Neural InformationProcessing Systems, V33, P14927
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Proceedings of SPIE
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Parallel Distributed Process
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1986, AI Mag., DOI DOI 10.1609/AIMAG.V7I2.542