Multifidelity Prediction Framework with Convolutional Neural Networks Using High-Dimensional Data

被引:3
作者
Emre Tekaslan, Huseyin [1 ]
Nikbay, Melike [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Aeronaut & Astronaut, AeroMDO Lab, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Aeronaut & Astronaut, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE INFORMATION SYSTEMS | 2023年 / 20卷 / 05期
关键词
Deep Convolutional Neural Network; Computational Aerodynamics; Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes; Multidisciplinary Design Optimization; Multifidelity Analysis; Deep Learning; SURROGATE MODEL; INVERSE DESIGN; OPTIMIZATION; UNCERTAINTY; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.2514/1.I011159
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This paper proposes two novel multifidelity neural network architectures developed for high-dimensional inputs such as computational flowfields. We employed a two-dimensional flow-varying transonic supercritical airfoil problem while exploring and comparing our methods with the former "multifidelity deep neural networks" from the literature. We call these novel methods "modified multifidelity deep neural networks" and "multifidelity convolutional neural networks." The main objective of this study is to establish an advanced multifidelity prediction framework that can be applied to any computational data; however, here, we applied our methods to the prediction of aerodynamic coefficients using pressure coefficient fields around the airfoil. To generate the dataset, first, a coarse grid is employed using the SU2 Euler solver for low-fidelity data; then, a relatively finer grid is used to obtain the viscous solutions by using the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model for the high-fidelity data. The performance metrics to compare the methods are determined as the test accuracy, the physical training time, and the size of the high-fidelity samples. The results demonstrate that the proposed multifidelity neural network architectures outperform the multifidelity deep neural networks in predictive modeling using high-dimensional inputs by improving the multifidelity prediction accuracy significantly.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 275
页数:12
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Simulation and Sensor Optimization for Multifidelity Dynamics Model Calibration [J].
Absi, Ghina N. ;
Mahadevan, Sankaran .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2020, 58 (02) :879-888
[2]  
Achour G., 2020, AIAA SCITECH 2020 FO, DOI DOI 10.2514/6.2020-2261
[3]   NONLINEAR MODEL ORDER REDUCTION VIA DYNAMIC MODE DECOMPOSITION [J].
Alla, Alessandro ;
Kutz, J. Nathan .
SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2017, 39 (05) :B778-B796
[4]  
Andrea DR, 2020, CEAS AERONAUT J, V11, P33, DOI DOI 10.1007/S13272-019-00389-Y
[5]   Autonomous Separation Assurance with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [J].
Brittain, Marc W. ;
Yang, Xuxi ;
Wei, Peng .
JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 18 (12) :890-905
[6]   DeepQA: improving the estimation of single protein model quality with deep belief networks [J].
Cao, Renzhi ;
Bhattacharya, Debswapna ;
Hou, Jie ;
Cheng, Jianlin .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2016, 17
[7]   Transfer learning based multi-fidelity physics informed deep neural network [J].
Chakraborty, Souvik .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2021, 426
[8]   Multi-level multi-fidelity sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on Gaussian process regression [J].
Cheng, Kai ;
Lu, Zhenzhou ;
Zhen, Ying .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 349 :360-377
[9]  
Cook P. H., 1979, 138 AGARD EXP DAT BA
[10]   Proper Orthogonal Decomposition as Surrogate Model for Aerodynamic Optimization [J].
Dolci, Valentina ;
Arina, Renzo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2016, 2016