Interobserver Agreement on "Assessment of Debris" During Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Drainage of Walled-off Pancreatic Necrosis

被引:2
作者
Pal, Partha [1 ]
Lakhtakia, Sundeep [1 ,3 ]
Jagtap, Nitin [1 ]
Asif, Shujaath [1 ]
Koduri, Krithi Krishna [1 ]
Gupta, Rajesh [1 ]
Basha, Jahangeer [1 ]
Haja, Azimudin [1 ]
Singh, Aniruddha Pratap [1 ]
Pasumarthy, Ashirwad [2 ]
Nabi, Zaheer [1 ]
Singh, Jagdeesh Rampal [2 ]
Kalpala, Rakesh [1 ]
Ramchandani, Mohan [1 ]
Reddy, D. Nageshwar [1 ]
机构
[1] Asian Inst Gastroenterol, Dept Med Gastroenterol, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
[2] Asian Inst Gastroenterol, Dept Radiol, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
[3] Asian Inst Gastroenterol, AIG Hosp, Endoscopy & EUS, Mindspace Rd, Hyderabad 500032, Telangana, India
来源
TECHNIQUES AND INNOVATIONS IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY | 2023年 / 25卷 / 03期
关键词
Pancreatic fluid collection (PFC); Walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN); Endoscopic ultra-sonography (EUS); Interventional EUS; Training; APPOSING METAL STENTS; FLUID COLLECTIONS; NECROTIZING PANCREATITIS; MANAGEMENT; PSEUDOCYSTS; RELIABILITY; EFFICACY; CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.tige.2023.03.003
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Estimation of the solid component in walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an important parameter to guide the selection of stent for drainage but is often not objectively quantified. METHODS: We aimed to study the interobserver agreement (IOA) among endosonographers assessing debris in the pancreatic fluid collection and their choice of stent. EUS videos of 15 patients having pancreatic fluid collection with concurrent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of debris were independently reviewed by 40 endosonographers for the percentage of debris (10% increments) and their choice of stent (plastic or metal). The Fleiss kappa (K) coefficient was used to assess IOA. Post-hoc analysis was done using wider debris intervals (20% or greater increments). RESULTS: Poor agreement was observed for the percentage of debris (K = 0.188), which did not improve (K = 0.196) even after including only expert endosonographers with more than 10 years of experience (n = 33). There was fair agreement (K = 0.266) with reference MRI on the percentage of debris. On post-hoc analysis, the IOA (K = 0.56, substantial agreement) and agreement with MRI (K = 0.59, substantial agreement) improved as the debris intervals widened (<10%, 10%-50%, >50%). The agreement for stent selection (plastic vs metal) was poor (K = 0.174) and did not improve with case volume (K = 0.153 among respondents with >25 EUS-guided drainage/year; n = 21) or years of experience (K = 0.195 for >10-year experience; n = 33). CONCLUSION: IOA between endosonographers regarding estimation of debris in WOPN and subsequent stent choice for drainage is poor. The experience of endosonographers did not improve IOA. Studies to standardize the EUS criteria for debris assessment in WOPN and subsequent therapeutic approaches are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 220
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Factors affecting the time interval of endoscopic ultrasound-guided endoscopic necrosectomy of walled-off pancreatic necrosis: A retrospective single-center study in China
    Liu, Qing
    Yang, Jian
    Zhang, Junwen
    PANCREATOLOGY, 2024, 24 (03) : 357 - 362
  • [22] Robotic pancreatic necrosectomy and internal drainage for walled-off pancreatic necrosis
    Wang, Yifan
    Yoshino, Osamu
    Driedger, Michael R.
    Beckman, Michael J.
    Vrochides, Dionisios
    Martinie, John B.
    HPB, 2023, 25 (07) : 813 - 819
  • [23] Comparison of abdominal ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in detection of necrotic debris in walled-off pancreatic necrosis
    Rana, Surinder S.
    Chaudhary, Vinita
    Sharma, Ravi
    Sharma, Vishal
    Chhabra, Puneet
    Bhasin, Deepak K.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY REPORT, 2016, 4 (01): : 50 - 53
  • [24] Transcutaneous Endoscopic Necrosectomy for Walled-off Pancreatic Necrosis in the Paracolic Gutter
    Saumoy, Monica
    Kumta, Nikhil A.
    Tyberg, Amy
    Brown, Elizabeth
    Lieberman, Micheal D.
    Eachempati, Soumitra R.
    Winokur, Ronald S.
    Gaidhane, Monica
    Sharaiha, Reem Z.
    Kahaleh, Michel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 52 (05) : 458 - 463
  • [25] When Should We Perform Endoscopic Drainage and Necrosectomy for Walled-Off Necrosis?
    Chantarojanasiri, Tanyaporn
    Ratanachu-Ek, Thawee
    Isayama, Hiroyuki
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (12) : 1 - 13
  • [26] Endoscopic, transmural drainage and necrosectomy for walled-off pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis is associated with low mortality - a single-center experience
    Schmidt, Palle Nordblad
    Novovic, Srdan
    Roug, Stine
    Feldager, Erik
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 50 (05) : 611 - 618
  • [27] Endoscopic Management of Giant Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis With a High Risk of Bleeding
    Alhasan, Faysal
    Hoilat, Gilles Jadd
    Malas, Waddah
    Mahmood, Syed K.
    Zivny, Jaroslav
    Alsayid, Muhammad
    ACG CASE REPORTS JOURNAL, 2019, 6 (08)
  • [28] Endoscopic gastric fenestration of debriding pancreatic walled-off necrosis: A pilot study
    Liu, Fang
    Wu, Liang
    Wang, Xiang-Dong
    Xiao, Jian-Guo
    Li, Wen
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 26 (41) : 6431 - 6441
  • [29] Endoscopic transluminal drainage of walled-off necrosis: Does size matter?
    Voermans, Rogier P.
    Fockens, Paul
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (04) : 708 - 710
  • [30] Direct endoscopic necrosectomy: a minimally invasive endoscopic technique for the treatment of infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis and infected pseudocysts with solid debris
    Ang, Tiing Leong
    Kwek, Andrew Boon Eu
    San Tan, Siong
    Ibrahim, Salleh
    Fock, Kwong Ming
    Teo, Eng Kiong
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 54 (04) : 206 - 211