A fuzzy group decision-making model for Water Distribution Network rehabilitation

被引:3
|
作者
Salehi, Sattar [1 ]
Fontana, Marcele Elisa [2 ]
Tscheikner-Gratl, Franz [3 ]
Herrera, Manuel [4 ]
Sadiq, Rehan [5 ]
Mian, Haroon R. [6 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Garmsar Branch, Garmsar, Iran
[2] Univ Fed Pernambuco UFPE, Mech Engn Dept, Recife, Brazil
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Univ Cambridge, Inst Mfg, Dept Engn, Cambridge, England
[5] Univ British Columbia, Sch Engn, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, BC, Canada
[6] Univ British Columbia, Sch Engn, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, BC, Canada
关键词
Water distribution networks; pipeline rehabilitation plans; group decision making; fuzzy group decision-making; pipes prioritization; rehabilitation strategy; NOMINAL GROUP TECHNIQUE; MAINTENANCE; ALTERNATIVES; MANAGEMENT; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1080/1573062X.2023.2295310
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Group Decision-Making (GDM), though could aid water companies in determining the Pipeline Rehabilitation Plans (PRPs) in any network size, can impose uncertainties on PRPs due to the different viewpoints of decision-makers. Thus, it should be determined when GDM could be ignored or should be considered for PRPs. To address this problem, a Fuzzy GDM model was developed to assess 10 scenarios of GDM in combination with 7 scenarios of network size. Hence, by participating experienced experts in different countries, PRPs were determined for various network sizes in a case study. The results indicated that the GDM could be ignored for PRPs with fewer pipes, whereas, should be considered for PRPs with more pipes. In addition, it was found that the groups with more decision-makers had less effect on pipes prioritization, but more influence on determining rehabilitation strategies. While, in groups with fewer decision-makers, the GDM could have the reverse effect.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 379
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条