Does mandatory tax disclosure mitigate tax expense anomaly? Evidence from FIN 48

被引:1
作者
Song, Huimin [1 ]
Tao, Xuedan [1 ]
Wang, Huabing [2 ]
Zhang, Jinkang [3 ]
Zhang, Linlin [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham Ningbo China, Nottingham Univ Business Sch China, Ningbo, Peoples R China
[2] West Texas A&M Univ, Paul & Virginia Engler Coll Business, Canyon, TX USA
[3] Anhui Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Accountancy, Bengbu, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Res Ctr Cent & Eastern Europe, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Tax uncertainty; uncertainty Tax expense anomaly; FIN; 48; Uncertain tax benefits; Uncertain tax positions; Tax disclosure; INVESTOR SOPHISTICATION; EARNINGS; INCOME; RESERVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.frl.2023.104686
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Financial Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48) mandates the disclosure of uncertain tax positions for U. S. public firms. Exploring its impact on market efficiency, we find a reduction in the tax expense anomaly as documented by Thomas and Zhang (2011) for affected firms. The effect is stronger for affected firms with higher disclosure quality, accuracy, and transient institutional shareholding, and it cannot be explained by increased analyst tax forecasts or decreased predictability of tax expenses for future profitability. Our findings suggest that the mandatory tax disclosure under FIN 48 encourages investors to assess the implications of tax information for stock prices.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Mutual Fund Transparency and Corporate Myopia [J].
Agarwal, Vikas ;
Vashishtha, Rahul ;
Venkatachalam, Mohan .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2018, 31 (05) :1966-2003
[2]   Analysts' pre-tax income forecasts and the tax expense anomaly [J].
Baik, Bok ;
Kim, Kyonghee ;
Morton, Richard ;
Roh, Yongoh .
REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2016, 21 (02) :559-595
[3]   Investor sophistication and patterns in stock returns after earnings announcements [J].
Bartov, E ;
Radhakrishnan, S ;
Krinsky, I .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2000, 75 (01) :43-63
[4]  
Blouin J.L., 2007, Tax contingencies: cushioning the blow to earnings?
[5]   What can we learn about uncertain tax benefits from FIN 48? [J].
Blouin, Jennifer ;
Gleason, Cristi ;
Mills, Lillian ;
Sikes, Stephanie .
NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL, 2007, 60 (03) :521-535
[6]   Insights from Academic Participation in the FAF's Initial PIR: The PIR of FIN 48 [J].
Blouin, Jennifer L. ;
Robinson, Leslie A. .
ACCOUNTING HORIZONS, 2014, 28 (03) :479-500
[7]   Pre-Empting Disclosure? Firms' Decisions Prior to FIN No. 48 [J].
Blouin, Jennifer L. ;
Gleason, Cristi A. ;
Mills, Lillian F. ;
Sikes, Stephanie A. .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2010, 85 (03) :791-815
[8]   Do Institutional Investors Prefer Near-Term Earnings over Long-Run Value? [J].
Bushee, Brian J. .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2001, 18 (02) :207-246
[9]   The impact of increased disclosure requirements and the standardization of accounting practices on earnings management through the reserve for income taxes [J].
Cazier, Richard ;
Rego, Sonja ;
Tian, Xiaoli ;
Wilson, Ryan .
REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2015, 20 (01) :436-469
[10]  
Ciconte W.A., 2016, WORKING PAPER, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.2390150, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2390150]