Assessing surface-groundwater interactions for sustaining spring wetlands of the Great Artesian Basin, Australia

被引:7
|
作者
Kaushik, Pankaj R. [1 ,2 ]
Ndehedehe, Christopher E. [1 ,2 ]
Burrows, Ryan M. [3 ]
Noll, Mark R. [4 ]
Kennard, Mark J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Griffith Sch Environm & Sci, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Sch Ecosyst & Forest Sci, Burnley Campus, Richmond, Vic 3121, Australia
[4] SUNY Coll Brockport, Dept Earth Sci, Brockport, NY 14420 USA
关键词
Spring wetlands; Surface-groundwater interaction; Great Artesian Basin; Partial Least Square Regression; Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment; TERRESTRIAL WATER STORAGE; VEGETATION; DYNAMICS; CLIMATE; NDVI; VARIABILITY; PRODUCTS; FLOWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110310
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The Great Artesian Basin (GAB) is one of the world's largest actively recharging aquifers. Groundwater dis-charges from the GAB sustain numerous spring wetlands, which have great ecological, scientific, and socio-economic significance. However, groundwater extraction and variation over time have had an impact on the quantity and area of spring wetlands with a 38% decline in extent since 1900. A major barrier to understanding variability in surface-groundwater interactions in spring wetlands of the GAB is the lack of observational data across critical spatial and temporal scales. Satellite observations have the ability to overcome this barrier and allow the evaluation of spring wetland responses to groundwater storage (GWS) variation. We investigated how GWS, and its associated drivers such as evapotranspiration (ET), soil moisture storage (SMS), and rainfall, in the GAB, influence the extent of surface water at five spring supergroups (Eulo, Barcaldine, Flinders, Springsure, and Springvale). We used satellite observations (2002-2017) to assess ET, SMS, rainfall, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and the modified normalized difference water index (mNDWI) for observing surfa-ce-groundwater interactions. NDVI responded positively to the GWS variation over the GAB and varies from sub -basin to sub-basin, with higher correlations in the Carpentaria sub-basin and some parts of Central and Western Eromanga. GWS variations was correlated with ET, SMS, rainfall, NDVI, mNDWI and surface water level (SWL). After a strong La Nin similar to a began in 2010, we uncovered relatively higher linear relationships between different components (ET, SMS, rainfall, NDVI, mNDWI, and SWL) and GWS variation (R2 > 0.50) than before the La Nin similar to a (R2 < 0.50), with the Flinders spring supergroup being the exception. NDVI and SMS are found to be the most significant predictor variables among ET, rainfall, SWL, and mNDWI components to influence GWS. This study provides improved understanding of surface-ground water interaction in spring wetlands and the influence of different hydrological components on variation in spring wetland extent in the GAB region.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spring wetlands of the Great Artesian Basin, Queensland, Australia
    Fensham, R. J.
    Fairfax, R. J.
    WETLANDS ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 11 (05) : 343 - 362
  • [2] Spring wetlands of the Great Artesian Basin, Queensland, Australia
    R.J. Fensham
    R.J. Fairfax
    Wetlands Ecology and Management, 2003, 11 : 343 - 362
  • [3] Response of spring wetlands to restored aquifer pressure in the Great Artesian Basin, Australia
    Fensham, R. J.
    Laffineur, B.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2022, 612
  • [4] Ranking spring wetlands in the Great Artesian Basin of Australia using endemicity and isolation of plant species
    Fensham, RJ
    Price, RJ
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2004, 119 (01) : 41 - 50
  • [5] A comprehensive review of South Australia's Great Artesian Basin spring and discharge wetlands biota
    Beasley-Hall, P. G.
    Hedges, B. A.
    Cooper, S. J. B.
    Austin, A. D.
    Guzik, M. T.
    MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 2024, 75 (13)
  • [6] Hydrochemical variations of groundwater and spring discharge of the western Great Artesian Basin, Australia: implications for regional groundwater flow
    Priestley, Stacey C.
    Shand, Paul
    Love, Andrew J.
    Crossey, Laura J.
    Karlstrom, Karl E.
    Keppel, Mark N.
    Wohling, Daniel L.
    Rousseau-Gueutin, Pauline
    HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 28 (01) : 263 - 278
  • [7] Field estimates of groundwater discharge - Great Artesian Basin, South Australia
    Costelloe, J. F.
    Matic, V.
    Western, A. W.
    Walker, J. P.
    Tyler, M.
    19TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION (MODSIM2011), 2011, : 2100 - 2106
  • [8] Groundwater flow underneath mound spring tufas from geophysical surveys in the southwestern Great Artesian Basin, Australia
    Inverarity, K.
    Heinson, G.
    Hatch, M.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, 2016, 63 (07) : 857 - 872
  • [9] Assessing Groundwater Storage Change in the Great Artesian Basin Using GRACE and Groundwater Budgets
    Castellazzi, P.
    Ransley, T.
    Mcpherson, A.
    Slatter, E.
    Frost, A.
    Shokri, A.
    Wallace, L.
    Crosbie, R.
    Janardhanan, S.
    Kilgour, P.
    Raiber, M.
    Vizy, J.
    Rollet, N.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2024, 60 (11)
  • [10] Great Artesian Basin in Australia.
    Forkasiewicz, Janina
    Bulletin du Bureau de recherches geologiques et minieres. Section 3, Hydrogeologie, 1982, (02): : 197 - 212