What do readers want? Results of an online survey to involve readers in updating the seventh edition of the Manual of dietetic practice

被引:1
作者
Wedlake, Linda [1 ,7 ]
Mellor, Duane [2 ]
Marriott, Tom [3 ]
Maslin, Kate [4 ]
Frost, Gary [5 ]
Hickson, Mary [6 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[2] Aston Med Sch, Birmingham, England
[3] Wiley, Chichester, England
[4] Univ Plymouth, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Plymouth, England
[5] Imperial Coll, Dept Metab Digest & Reprod, London, England
[6] Univ Plymouth, Sch Hlth Profess, Plymouth, England
[7] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Downs Rd, London SM2 5PT, England
关键词
Manual of dietetic practice; online survey; professional practice; textbook;
D O I
10.1111/jhn.13254
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: The Manual of dietetic practice ('Manual') is the core textbook for qualified and student dietitians. A survey was conducted to explore views on the scope, content and presentation of the Manual to inform the forthcoming edition.Methods: The survey comprised of questions on demographics, structure, content, access (print/digital), missing topics, strengths and weaknesses. It was distributed to members of the British Dietetic Association (BDA) and other relevant groups in August 2022. Responses are presented as frequencies and free text as themes.Results: Of 1179 responses, 91% were from professionals, of whom 72% were registered dietitians with a mean of 12.7 years (range: 1-44) in practice: 60% worked in the United Kingdom with 52% based in a clinical setting. The printed version was preferred: 59% professionals, 60% students, 94% professionals and 88% students were satisfied with the structure; however, 26% professionals and 22% students identified content that was lacking or outdated, including mental health and sustainability. The strengths were its comprehensive coverage and respected contributing authors. Weaknesses included the cost, size, lack of visual aids and currency. Professionals indicated the seventh edition should focus on more practical information required for clinical practice, whereas students wanted more emphasis on summarised information and visual formats.Conclusions: The survey proved a valuable method to engage with the readership to ensure the next edition reflected their requirements. Although nearly all respondents were satisfied with the scope and content, the results highlighted those topics lacking and/or outdated. Results also showed that the next edition should focus on practical information required for clinical practice, with more summarised and visual formats.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 291
页数:12
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352
  • [2] Gandy J., 2014, Manual of Dietetic Practice, V5th
  • [3] Gandy J., 2019, Manual of dietetic practice, V6th
  • [4] The Survey Checklist (Manifesto)
    Gehlbach, Hunter
    Artino, Anthony R., Jr.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2018, 93 (03) : 360 - 366
  • [5] Can Lottery Incentives Boost Web Survey Response Rates? Findings from Four Experiments
    Laguilles, Jerold S.
    Williams, Elizabeth A.
    Saunders, Daniel B.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 52 (05) : 537 - 553
  • [6] Research into questionnaire design A summary of the literature
    Lietz, Petra
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2010, 52 (02) : 249 - 272
  • [7] Thomas B., 1988, MANUAL DIETETIC PRAC
  • [8] Thomas B., 2007, The manual of dietetic practice, V5th
  • [9] Thomas B., 2001, MANUAL DIETETIC PRAC, V3rd
  • [10] Thomas B., 1994, MANUAL DIETETIC PRAC