Value capture in open innovation: A literature review and a research agenda

被引:5
|
作者
Toroslu, Adrian [1 ,5 ]
Schemmann, Brita [2 ]
Chappin, Maryse M. H. [3 ]
Castaldi, Carolina [1 ]
Herrmann, Andrea M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Human Geog & Spatial Planning, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Hsch Bremen, Sch Int Business, Bremen, Germany
[3] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen Sch Management, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Utrecht, Human Geog & Spatial Planning, Econ Geog, Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Open innovation; Value capture; Value appropriation; Integrative literature review; Research agenda; CLOSING OPEN INNOVATION; VALUE CO-CREATION; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; PARTNER SELECTION; KNOWLEDGE SPILLOVERS; VALUE-APPROPRIATION; BUSINESS MODELS; PARADOX; COLLABORATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.08.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
While empirical research on open innovation initially focused on value creation, there has been a growing interest in value capture among academics and companies. Understanding value capture is crucial, as the success of open innovation activities depends on the value capture potential of all actors involved. To provide an overview of the key findings and guide future research, we conducted an integrative literature review of 69 empirical studies on value capture in open innovation. When analyzing these studies, we focused on what value is captured, who captures it, and how actor strategies influence the value captured in collaborative innovation activities. Our analysis identified four areas for further research, namely (i) broadening concepts and measures of value, (ii) understanding the importance of contextual factors in capturing value, (iii) adopting a dynamic perspective in studying value capture, and (iv) capturing social and environmental value in light of wicked problems.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 312
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Open Innovation: Literature Review and Outlook
    Xu, Yin-jie
    Zheng, Jian-zhuang
    PROCEEDING OF 2012 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY (ISMOT'2012), 2012, : 558 - 562
  • [22] Learning from innovation failures: a systematic review of the literature and research agenda
    Rhaiem, Khalil
    Amara, Nabil
    REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 15 (02) : 189 - 234
  • [23] Ecosystem Value Creation and Capture: A Systematic Review of Literature and Potential Research Opportunities
    Khademi, Behrooz
    TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 10 (01): : 16 - 34
  • [24] AI for managing open innovation: Opportunities, challenges, and a research agenda
    Broekhuizen, Thijs
    Dekker, Henri
    de Faria, Pedro
    Firk, Sebastian
    Nguyen, Dinh Khoi
    Sofka, Wolfgang
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2023, 167
  • [25] Value co-creation: a review of literature and future research agenda
    Saha, Victor
    Goyal, Praveen
    Jebarajakirthy, Charles
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2022, 37 (03) : 612 - 628
  • [26] Coopetition and innovation: A review and research agenda
    Corbo, Leonardo
    Kraus, Sascha
    Vlacic, Bozidar
    Dabic, Marina
    Caputo, Andrea
    Pellegrini, Massimiliano M.
    TECHNOVATION, 2023, 122
  • [27] Data-Driven Innovation: A Literature Review, Conceptual Framework, and Research Agenda
    Wong, David T. W.
    Ngai, Eric W. T.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2024, 71 : 5815 - 5828
  • [28] A Research Agenda on Open Data Impact Process for Open Innovation
    Corrales-Garay, Diego
    Ortiz-De-Urbina-Criado, Marta
    Mora-Valentin, Eva-Maria
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 (08): : 34696 - 34705
  • [29] Barriers to Outbound Open Innovation: Literature Review
    Bagherzadeh, Gholamreza
    Baghizadeh, Zeinab
    O'Donnell, Loretta
    INNOVATION VISION 2020: SUSTAINABLE GROWTH, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2012, : 366 - 375
  • [30] Open innovation in SMEs: a systematic literature review
    Hossain, Mokter
    Kauranen, Ilkka
    JOURNAL OF STRATEGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 9 (01) : 58 - 73