Application of machine learning and artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and classification of polycystic ovarian syndrome: a systematic review

被引:11
作者
Barrera, Francisco J. [1 ,2 ]
Brown, Ethan D. L. [3 ]
Rojo, Amanda [2 ]
Obeso, Javier [2 ]
Plata, Hiram [2 ]
Lincango, Eddy P. [4 ]
Terry, Nancy [5 ]
Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene [2 ,4 ,6 ]
Hall, Janet E. [3 ]
Shekhar, Skand [3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA USA
[2] Univ Autonoma Nuevo Leon, Unit Mayo Clin, KER Unit Mexico, Plataforma INVEST Med,Knowledge Educ Res UANL KER, Monterrey, Mexico
[3] Natl Inst Environm Hlth Sci, NIH, Clin Res Branch, Reprod Physiol & Pathophysiol Grp, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Knowledge & Evaluat Res Unit Endocrinol KER Endo, Rochester, MN USA
[5] NIH, Div Lib Serv, Off Res Serv, Bethesda, MD USA
[6] Univ Autonoma Nuevo Leon, Univ Hosp Dr Jose E Gonzalez, Dept Internal Med, Endocrinol Div, Monterrey, Mexico
来源
FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY | 2023年 / 14卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
artificial intelligence; machine learning; polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS); diagnosis; classification; Stein-Leventhal syndrome; SYNDROME PCOS; SERUM METABOLOMICS; UNITED-STATES; HEALTH-CARE; PREVALENCE; RISK; FEATURES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.3389/fendo.2023.1106625
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrinopathy in women of reproductive age and remains widely underdiagnosed leading to significant morbidity. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) hold promise in improving diagnostics. Thus, we performed a systematic review of literature to identify the utility of AI/ML in the diagnosis or classification of PCOS.Methods: We applied a search strategy using the following databases MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Web of Science, and the IEEE Xplore Digital Library using relevant keywords. Eligible studies were identified, and results were extracted for their synthesis from inception until January 1, 2022.Results: 135 studies were screened and ultimately, 31 studies were included in this study. Data sources used by the AI/ML interventions included clinical data, electronic health records, and genetic and proteomic data. Ten studies (32%) employed standardized criteria (NIH, Rotterdam, or Revised International PCOS classification), while 17 (55%) used clinical information with/without imaging. The most common AI techniques employed were support vector machine (42% studies), K-nearest neighbor (26%), and regression models (23%) were the commonest AI/ML. Receiver operating curves (ROC) were employed to compare AI/ML with clinical diagnosis. Area under the ROC ranged from 73% to 100% (n=7 studies), diagnostic accuracy from 89% to 100% (n=4 studies), sensitivity from 41% to 100% (n=10 studies), specificity from 75% to 100% (n=10 studies), positive predictive value (PPV) from 68% to 95% (n=4 studies), and negative predictive value (NPV) from 94% to 99% (n=2 studies).Conclusion: Artificial intelligence and machine learning provide a high diagnostic and classification performance in detecting PCOS, thereby providing an avenue for early diagnosis of this disorder. However, AI-based studies should use standardized PCOS diagnostic criteria to enhance the clinical applicability of AI/ML in PCOS and improve adherence to methodological and reporting guidelines for maximum diagnostic utility.Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022295287.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [31] Dysregulated immunological and metabolic functions discovered by a polygenic integrative analysis for PCOS
    Ho, Chi-Hong
    Chang, Chia-Ming
    Li, Hsin-Yang
    Shen, Heng-Yi
    Lieu, Fu-Kong
    Wang, Paulus Shyi-Gang
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2020, 40 (01) : 160 - 167
  • [32] Machine Learning Applications Endocrinology and Metabolism Research: An Overview
    Hong, Namki
    Park, Heajeong
    Rhee, Yumie
    [J]. ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2020, 35 (01) : 71 - 84
  • [33] IHME, 2022, Polycystic ovarian syndrome. GBD Results
  • [34] Artificial Intelligence Can Cut Costs While Maintaining Accuracy in Colorectal Cancer Genotyping
    Kacew, Alec J.
    Strohbehn, Garth W.
    Saulsberry, Loren
    Laiteerapong, Neda
    Cipriani, Nicole A.
    Kather, Jakob N.
    Pearson, Alexander T.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [35] Prevalence of the polycystic ovary syndrome in unselected black and white women of the southeastern United States: A prospective study
    Knochenhauer, ES
    Key, TJ
    Kahsar-Miller, M
    Waggoner, W
    Boots, LR
    Azziz, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1998, 83 (09) : 3078 - 3082
  • [36] Classification of ovary abnormality using the probabilistic neural network (PNN)
    Kumar, H. Prasanna
    Srinivasan, S.
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2014, 22 (06) : 857 - 865
  • [37] Kumar HP., 2014, 2 INT C CURR TRENDS, V2014
  • [38] Computer assisted detection of polycystic ovary morphology in ultrasound images
    Lawrence, Maryruth J.
    Eramian, Mark G.
    Pierson, Roger A.
    Neufeld, Eric
    [J]. FOURTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND ROBOT VISION, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 105 - +
  • [39] Diagnosis and Treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline
    Legro, Richard S.
    Arslanian, Silva A.
    Ehrmann, David A.
    Hoeger, Kathleen M.
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Pasquali, Renato
    Welt, Corrine K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2013, 98 (12) : 4565 - 4592
  • [40] Visualization of clinical data with neural networks, Case study: Polycystic ovary syndrome
    Lehtinen, JC
    Forsstrom, J
    Koskinen, P
    Penttila, TA
    Jarvi, T
    Anttila, L
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 1997, 44 (02) : 145 - 155