Application of machine learning and artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and classification of polycystic ovarian syndrome: a systematic review

被引:11
作者
Barrera, Francisco J. [1 ,2 ]
Brown, Ethan D. L. [3 ]
Rojo, Amanda [2 ]
Obeso, Javier [2 ]
Plata, Hiram [2 ]
Lincango, Eddy P. [4 ]
Terry, Nancy [5 ]
Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene [2 ,4 ,6 ]
Hall, Janet E. [3 ]
Shekhar, Skand [3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA USA
[2] Univ Autonoma Nuevo Leon, Unit Mayo Clin, KER Unit Mexico, Plataforma INVEST Med,Knowledge Educ Res UANL KER, Monterrey, Mexico
[3] Natl Inst Environm Hlth Sci, NIH, Clin Res Branch, Reprod Physiol & Pathophysiol Grp, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Knowledge & Evaluat Res Unit Endocrinol KER Endo, Rochester, MN USA
[5] NIH, Div Lib Serv, Off Res Serv, Bethesda, MD USA
[6] Univ Autonoma Nuevo Leon, Univ Hosp Dr Jose E Gonzalez, Dept Internal Med, Endocrinol Div, Monterrey, Mexico
来源
FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY | 2023年 / 14卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
artificial intelligence; machine learning; polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS); diagnosis; classification; Stein-Leventhal syndrome; SYNDROME PCOS; SERUM METABOLOMICS; UNITED-STATES; HEALTH-CARE; PREVALENCE; RISK; FEATURES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.3389/fendo.2023.1106625
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrinopathy in women of reproductive age and remains widely underdiagnosed leading to significant morbidity. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) hold promise in improving diagnostics. Thus, we performed a systematic review of literature to identify the utility of AI/ML in the diagnosis or classification of PCOS.Methods: We applied a search strategy using the following databases MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Web of Science, and the IEEE Xplore Digital Library using relevant keywords. Eligible studies were identified, and results were extracted for their synthesis from inception until January 1, 2022.Results: 135 studies were screened and ultimately, 31 studies were included in this study. Data sources used by the AI/ML interventions included clinical data, electronic health records, and genetic and proteomic data. Ten studies (32%) employed standardized criteria (NIH, Rotterdam, or Revised International PCOS classification), while 17 (55%) used clinical information with/without imaging. The most common AI techniques employed were support vector machine (42% studies), K-nearest neighbor (26%), and regression models (23%) were the commonest AI/ML. Receiver operating curves (ROC) were employed to compare AI/ML with clinical diagnosis. Area under the ROC ranged from 73% to 100% (n=7 studies), diagnostic accuracy from 89% to 100% (n=4 studies), sensitivity from 41% to 100% (n=10 studies), specificity from 75% to 100% (n=10 studies), positive predictive value (PPV) from 68% to 95% (n=4 studies), and negative predictive value (NPV) from 94% to 99% (n=2 studies).Conclusion: Artificial intelligence and machine learning provide a high diagnostic and classification performance in detecting PCOS, thereby providing an avenue for early diagnosis of this disorder. However, AI-based studies should use standardized PCOS diagnostic criteria to enhance the clinical applicability of AI/ML in PCOS and improve adherence to methodological and reporting guidelines for maximum diagnostic utility.Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022295287.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] ADAMS J, 1985, LANCET, V2, P1375
  • [2] Cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence for screening colonoscopy: a modelling study
    Areia, Miguel
    Mori, Yuichi
    Correale, Loredana
    Repici, Alessandro
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Sharma, Prateek
    Taveira, Filipe
    Spadaccini, Marco
    Antonelli, Giulio
    Ebigbo, Alanna
    Kudo, Shin-Ei
    Arribas, Julia
    Barua, Ishita
    Kaminski, Michal F.
    Messmann, Helmut
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario
    Hassan, Cesare
    [J]. LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2022, 4 (06): : E436 - E444
  • [3] The prevalence and features of the polycystic ovary syndrome in an unselected population
    Azziz, R
    Woods, KS
    Reyna, R
    Key, TJ
    Knochenhauer, ES
    Yildiz, BO
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2004, 89 (06) : 2745 - 2749
  • [4] POLYCYSTIC-OVARY-SYNDROME - THE SPECTRUM OF THE DISORDER IN 1741 PATIENTS
    BALEN, AH
    CONWAY, GS
    KALTSAS, G
    TECHATRAISAK, K
    MANNING, PJ
    WEST, C
    JACOBS, HS
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (08) : 2107 - 2111
  • [5] The state of artificial intelligence-based FDA-approved medical devices and algorithms: an online database
    Benjamens, Stan
    Dhunnoo, Pranavsingh
    Mesko, Bertalan
    [J]. NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2020, 3 (01)
  • [6] Bharati S., 2020, IEEE REGION 10 SYMP, P1486, DOI DOI 10.1109/tensymp50017.2020.9230932
  • [7] Bulsara Jeshica., 2021, Endocrine and Metabolic Science, V3, P2666, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.ENDMTS.2021.100085, 10.1016/j.endmts.2021.100085]
  • [8] Cahyono B, 2017, 2017 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICOIC7), DOI 10.1109/ICoICT.2017.8074702
  • [9] Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): Arguably the most common endocrinopathy is associated with significant morbidity in women
    Carmina, E
    Lobo, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1999, 84 (06) : 1897 - 1899
  • [10] Identification of subjects with polycystic ovary syndrome using electronic health records
    Castro, Victor
    Shen, Yuanyuan
    Yu, Sheng
    Finan, Sean
    Pau, Cindy Ta
    Gainer, Vivian
    Keefe, Candace C.
    Savova, Guergana
    Murphy, Shawn N.
    Cai, Tianxi
    Welt, Corrine K.
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 13