How Emotions Can Enhance Crisis Communication: Theorizing Around Moral Outrage

被引:12
作者
Coombs, W. Timothy [1 ]
Tachkova, Elina R. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Ctr Crisis & Risk Commun, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Commun Studies, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Commun Studies, Kowloon Tong, 5 Hereford Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
crisis communication; emotion; extreme crisis; moral outrage; REPUTATION; MOTIVATION; MEDIA; COMPASSION; COGNITIONS; STRATEGIES; CELEBRITY; OTHERS; EVENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/1062726X.2023.2244615
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Research and practice have noted the existence of what have been termed sticky crises. Sticky crises are extraordinary because they create uniquely challenging situations for crisis managers (Reber, Yarbrough, Nowak & Jin, 2020). This paper uses the emotion of moral outrage to conceptualize one form of sticky crisis we term moral outrage inducing crises and to outline a research program designed to develop theory and to enhance the practice related to this variant of sticky crises. The first section reviews the nature of sticky crises and what makes them complicated and difficult to manage. The next section discusses how people assess crisis situations arguing this is done based on cognitions and emotions. We then explore how moral outrage affects critical crisis assessments and provide a series of propositions designed to advance theory and practice for crisis communication in moral outrage inducing crises. We argue that an emotion-driven approach to crisis communication coupled with a concern for morals will promote a better understanding and management of moral outrage inducing crises and potentially other sticky crises that evoke moral outrage.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 22
页数:17
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] An Extended Model of Moral Outrage at Corporate Social Irresponsibility
    Antonetti, Paolo
    Maklan, Stan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2016, 135 (03) : 429 - 444
  • [2] Overperception of moral outrage in online social networks inflates beliefs about intergroup hostility
    Brady, William J.
    McLoughlin, Killian L.
    Torres, Mark P.
    Luo, Kara F. F.
    Gendron, Maria
    Crockett, M. J.
    [J]. NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2023, 7 (06) : 917 - 927
  • [3] Brown KA, 2022, The Handbook of Crisis Communication, P17, DOI [10.1002/9781119678953.ch2, DOI 10.1002/9781119678953.CH2]
  • [4] A BURDEN OF RESPONSIBILITY: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL APPROVAL AT THE ONSET OF A CRISIS
    Bundy, Jonathan
    Pfarrer, Michael D.
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2015, 40 (03) : 345 - 369
  • [5] Cancel A.E., 1997, Journal of Public Relations Research, V9, P31, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr090102, DOI 10.1207/S1532754XJPRR0901_02]
  • [6] Partisanship, Religion, and Issue Polarization in the United States: A Reassessment
    Castle, Jeremiah J.
    Stepp, Kyla K.
    [J]. POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2021, 43 (03) : 1311 - 1335
  • [7] Organizational Crisis Communication: Suboptimal Crisis Response Selection Decisions and Behavioral Economics
    Claeys, An-Sofie
    Coombs, W. Timothy
    [J]. COMMUNICATION THEORY, 2020, 30 (03) : 290 - 309
  • [8] Trends in theory building and theory testing:: A five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal
    Colquitt, Jason A.
    Zapata-Phelan, Cindy P.
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 50 (06) : 1281 - 1303
  • [9] Coombs W., 2023, Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing, and Responding
  • [10] Coombs W. T., 2002, Management Communication Quarterly, V16, P165, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1177/089331802237233, DOI 10.1177/089331802237233, 10.1177/089331802237233]