Exploring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Predictive Models, Radiomic, and Pathological Markers in Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

被引:3
作者
Elsayed, Basma [1 ]
Alksas, Ahmed [2 ]
Shehata, Mohamed [2 ]
Mahmoud, Ali [2 ]
Zaky, Mona [3 ]
Alghandour, Reham [4 ]
Abdelwahab, Khaled [5 ]
Abdelkhalek, Mohamed [5 ]
Ghazal, Mohammed [6 ]
Contractor, Sohail [7 ]
El-Din Moustafa, Hossam [8 ]
El-Baz, Ayman [2 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Fac Engn, Biomed Engn Program, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
[2] Univ Louisville, Dept Bioengn, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[3] Mansoura Univ, Fac Med, Diagnost Radiol Dept, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
[4] Mansoura Univ, Mansoura Oncol Ctr, Med Oncol Dept, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
[5] Mansoura Univ, Mansoura Oncol Ctr, Surg Oncol Dept, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
[6] Abu Dhabi Univ, Elect Comp & Biomed Engn Dept, Abu Dhabi 59911, U Arab Emirates
[7] Univ Louisville, Dept Radiol, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[8] Mansoura Univ, Fac Engn, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
关键词
breast cancer; computed tomography; mammography; magnetic resonance imaging; multi-modal imaging; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; pathological markers; predictive models; radiomic markers; treatment response; ENHANCED SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DCE-MRI; COMPLETE RESPONSE; QUANTITATIVE ULTRASOUND; TEXTURE ANALYSIS; F-18-FDG PET/CT; FDG-PET/CT; CYCLES; THERAPY; FEATURES;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15215288
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Breast cancer is considered as the most common malignancy among females, and its treatment takes many forms and types. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), which is the treatment precedes the surgical intervention, became the preferred treatment approach for some subtypes of breast tumors. However, some patients exhibit good response to the neoadjuvant treatment, while others do not. Therefore, the proactive prediction of patients' response to NACT is a necessity to reduce the exposure to unnecessary doses of treatment, treatment costs, and side effects. Many researchers proposed prediction models to predict patients' response to NACT either at early stage of treatment or prior to the initiation of the first cycle. They used various radiomics, pathological, and clinical predictors and markers. This review discusses some of the researches conducted the last decade based on statistical, machine learning, or deep learning approaches.Abstract Breast cancer retains its position as the most prevalent form of malignancy among females on a global scale. The careful selection of appropriate treatment for each patient holds paramount importance in effectively managing breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) plays a pivotal role in the comprehensive treatment of this disease. Administering chemotherapy before surgery, NACT becomes a powerful tool in reducing tumor size, potentially enabling fewer invasive surgical procedures and even rendering initially inoperable tumors amenable to surgery. However, a significant challenge lies in the varying responses exhibited by different patients towards NACT. To address this challenge, researchers have focused on developing prediction models that can identify those who would benefit from NACT and those who would not. Such models have the potential to reduce treatment costs and contribute to a more efficient and accurate management of breast cancer. Therefore, this review has two objectives: first, to identify the most effective radiomic markers correlated with NACT response, and second, to explore whether integrating radiomic markers extracted from radiological images with pathological markers can enhance the predictive accuracy of NACT response. This review will delve into addressing these research questions and also shed light on the emerging research direction of leveraging artificial intelligence techniques for predicting NACT response, thereby shaping the future landscape of breast cancer treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:52
相关论文
共 142 条
  • [1] Texture analysis in assessment and prediction of chemotherapy response in breast cancer
    Ahmed, Arfan
    Gibbs, Peter
    Pickles, Martin
    Turnbull, Lindsay
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 38 (01) : 89 - 101
  • [2] Can FDG-PET/CT predict early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer?
    Andrade, W. P.
    Lima, E. N. P.
    Osorio, C. A. B. T.
    do Socorro Maciel, M.
    Baiocchi, G.
    Bitencourt, A. G. V.
    Fanelli, M. F.
    Damascena, A. S.
    Soares, F. A.
    [J]. EJSO, 2013, 39 (12): : 1358 - 1363
  • [3] [Anonymous], New Guidelines Move beyond Chemotherapy for Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer-targetedonc.com
  • [4] [Anonymous], Cancer-who.int
  • [5] [Anonymous], General Principles of Neoadjuvant Management of Breast CancerGoals
  • [6] PET/CT radiomics in breast cancer: promising tool for prediction of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Antunovic, Lidija
    De Sanctis, Rita
    Cozzi, Luca
    Kirienko, Margarita
    Sagona, Andrea
    Torrisi, Rosalba
    Tinterri, Corrado
    Santoro, Armando
    Chiti, Arturo
    Zelic, Renata
    Sollini, Martina
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2019, 46 (07) : 1468 - 1477
  • [7] Breast DCE-MRI Kinetic Heterogeneity Tumor Markers: Preliminary Associations With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response
    Ashraf, Ahmed
    Gaonkar, Bilwaj
    Mies, Carolyn
    DeMichele, Angela
    Rosen, Mark
    Davatzikos, Christos
    Kontos, Despina
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 8 (03): : 154 - 162
  • [8] Spatiotemporal features of DCE-MRI for breast cancer diagnosis
    Banaie, Masood
    Soltanian-Zadeh, Hamid
    Saligheh-Rad, Hamid-Reza
    Gity, Masoumeh
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2018, 155 : 153 - 164
  • [9] The role of F-18-fluorothymidine PET in oncology
    Bertagna F.
    Biasiotto G.
    Giubbini R.
    [J]. Clinical and Translational Imaging, 2013, 1 (2) : 77 - 97
  • [10] Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography: Technique, Indications, and Clinical Applications
    Bhimani, Chandni
    Matta, Danielle
    Roth, Robyn G.
    Liao, Lydia
    Tinney, Elizabeth
    Brill, Kristin
    Germaine, Pauline
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (01) : 84 - 88