Champions of Transparency in Education: What Journal Reviewers Can Do to Encourage Open Science Practices

被引:0
作者
Renbarger, Rachel [1 ]
Adelson, Jill L. [2 ]
Rosenberg, Joshua M. [3 ,4 ]
Stegenga, Sondra M. [5 ]
Lowrey, Olivia [6 ]
Buckley, Pamela R. [7 ]
Zhang, Qiyang [8 ]
机构
[1] FHI 360, Durham, NC USA
[2] Adelson Res & Consulting, Durham, NC USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, STEM Educ, Knoxville, TN USA
[4] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Enhancing Educ Math & Sci, Knoxville, TN USA
[5] Univ Utah, Dept Special Educ, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[6] Ctr Open Sci, Programs Dept, Charlottesville, VA USA
[7] Univ Colorado, Inst Behav Sci, Boulder, CO USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Educ, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
open science; journal reviewer; peer review; education; research transparency; REPORTING QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1177/00169862231184575
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
As the field of education, and especially gifted education, gradually moves toward open science, our research community increasingly values transparency and openness brought by open science practices. Yet, individual researchers may be reluctant to adopt open science practices due to low incentives, barriers of extra workload, or lack of support to apply these in certain areas, such as qualitative research. We encourage and give guidelines to reviewers to champion open science practices by warmly influencing authors to consider applying open science practices to quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research and providing ample support to produce higher-quality publications. Instead of imposing open science practices on authors, we advocate reviewers suggest small, non-threatening, specific steps to support authors without making them feel overwhelmed, judged, or punished. We believe that these small steps taken by reviewers will make a difference to create a more supportive environment for researchers to adopt more open science practices.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 351
页数:15
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Gifted Child Quarterly's Commitment to Transparency, Openness, and Research Improvement
    Adelson, Jill L.
    Matthews, Michael S.
    [J]. GIFTED CHILD QUARTERLY, 2019, 63 (02) : 83 - 85
  • [2] Linked publications from a single trial: a thread of evidence
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Furberg, Curt D.
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    Shanahan, Daniel R.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2014, 15
  • [3] Evaluating Content-Related Validity Evidence Using a Text-Based Machine Learning Procedure
    Anderson, Daniel
    Rowley, Brock
    Stegenga, Sondra
    Irvin, P. Shawn
    Rosenberg, Joshua M.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT-ISSUES AND PRACTICE, 2020, 39 (04) : 53 - 64
  • [4] REES: A Registry of Efficacy and Effectiveness Studies in Education
    Anderson, Dustin
    Spybrook, Jessaca
    Maynard, Rebecca
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2019, 48 (01) : 45 - 50
  • [5] Qualitative Data Management and Analysis within a Data Repository
    Antonio, Marcy G.
    Schick-Makaroff, Kara
    Doiron, James M.
    Sheilds, Laurene
    White, Lacie
    Molzahn, Anita
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2020, 42 (08) : 640 - 648
  • [6] Arza Valeria, 2017, Information Services & Use, V37, P463, DOI 10.3233/ISU-170861
  • [7] Bailey P., 2022, PACKAGE EDSURVEY
  • [8] Comparing grounded theory and topic modeling: Extreme divergence or unlikely convergence?
    Baumer, Eric P. S.
    Mimno, David
    Guha, Shion
    Quan, Emily
    Gay, Geri K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 68 (06) : 1397 - 1410
  • [10] Center for Open Science, 2022, REG REP